Other #77138 About women, is this true?

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Muslim population is 2 billions,1/4 of world population.
That means at least 1 billion women are living with muslims, almost 1 in 4 women.
Lets say half muslim men are good(I'm really generous)
The other half is evil
Thats 500 millions.
East Asia and Africa aren't good places to be women too.
I think we need to agree people are different everywhere.
Rules and laws that are good for Europe may not be good for other places and vice versa.
European men could be nice (bad people exist everywhere)but white race is a minority and even they are terrified to share a continent with muslim men but women in muslim countries are supposed to share a house with these men...
I have tried this before but most men can't even look at the videos of what muslim women are going through.
When you show them they don't even look and they get emotional.
Not all muslim countries are brown,many are white like Chechenya for example.
Their women suffer and no one cares about them.
Majority of women aren't safe.
Men need to understand why women find it hard to trust them with everything.

Modern women are stressed and angry because of all these problems

I am not trying to argue with you. I just write things that I think are important.

In European countries, it is the women who all voted to open their borders and import in millions of violent subhuman animal muslims because women have a higher agreeableness, higher empathy for other people, and tend to think more emotionally than logically. Women vote to import millions of muslims because they are told to feel bad for them, and they are convinced to care about the muslims more than they care about their own people. And because of women's high agreeableness, they make choices based on what they believe other people will think about them emotionally. Women voting to open all borders and allow the flood of violent criminal animals, just because they don't want people to think that they are "racist." And for not other reason. There is no deep level of thinking happening.

The reason Europe is now filled with rape gangs and sharia law is mostly because of women voting for, funding, volunteering, and working to do everything they can to bring these in. A woman will distrust her own soul and her own psychic senses warning her of a danger, and will put herself into dangerous situations, just because she doesn't want other women to think that she is racist.

These political facts can not be ignored. Of course there are many worthless low testosterone weak men who also have worked to import all of the world's worst animal criminals into white countries. But it is nearly all women who are on that side. White men can try our hardest to protect our people, but it is not possible when the women work suicidally towards the death of our civilizations. Whatever the name of the specific groups are in each country, the side of communist jews working to extinct our people is always supported most highly by women. Their agreeableness means that their only thought is about other people thinking that they are good people, and they care nothing for facts or reality. The only thing it takes to trick them is to just say, "If you vote for us, you are a good person. And if you don't vote for us, you are a bad person." This is literally the only democrat argument and has been for decades. There are no facts, no logic, no examples, and no arguments needed. Woman brain just says "I need everyone to think I am a good person, so I need to vote for our own extinction because if I don't then it would be racist."

Of course there are some women who are smarter than this and who are not what I describe. It sounds like you are better than this. But the extreme majority of women vote in exactly the way I describe and for exactly those reasons. If you compare the voting trends between men and women, it is always the women who vote in the higher numbers to open the borders and bring in the rape gangs. Only for the reason of "I don't want people to say I'm racist." If you only had men voting, all of the borders of white countries would be closed and there would not be any muslim, criminal, rapist, or violent person allowed to come in.


Like many other tools, voting is a tool that can be very dangerous when it is used wrong. If a woman uses a chainsaw and is not strong enough to control it, she could end up accidentally cutting off her leg. If a woman is not mentally strong enough to use voting correctly, she could end up accidentally importing millions of rapists and murderers to burn our civilization to the ground and extinct our entire race. You see the voting is a much more dangerous tool than the chainsaw, because the chainsaw is only a threat to herself.


I will not say that women should not be allowed to vote. All I do is say true facts based on the statistics of how women usually vote almost always. Which makes it possible to say what problems we have that we would not have if things were different. All I can say is the right to vote should be determined by serious mental and psychological testing so that voters are logical, rational, intelligent, have at least a minimum IQ level, and most importantly have a low agreeableness level. Voters need to operate based on facts, truth, logic, and reality. Anybody who is only operating based on agreeableness, and by emotional reactions that were programmed by jewish emotional propaganda, should not be allowed to vote. There are both men and women who fit that description, but it is more often women.

 

[616Taysha]

Why was it that moderate liberals voted for Trump? Maybe because they could see crime and villainy on the street? Especially in sanctuary cities, where illegal aliens CHARGED WITH crimes such as murder, rape, etc, were allowed to roam freely. Laken Riley act anyone? Oh, libs are also against women - check Riley Gaines vs Lia Thomas.

Who, when Trump won, protested by haiving their heads shaved? Women. Who keeps other, younger women single due to their poor choices and bitterness? Other, embittered women.

Collectivism is the key word. Those girlies who like hanging around together are the same ones who will stab one of her own in tha back - misery loves company after all.

As for womens' compassionate nature... well, I'm not sure about that. It is not up to a man to abort pregnancy. It is not a man who benefits from divorce. It is not a man who divorces a woman becasue he felt unhappy.

And yes, there are those damnable simps - they too are guilty.

 

[Proshat]

Most women

I am not trying to argue with you. I just write things that I think are important.

In European countries, it is the women who all voted to open their borders and import in millions of violent subhuman animal muslims because women have a higher agreeableness, higher empathy for other people, and tend to think more emotionally than logically. Women vote to import millions of muslims because they are told to feel bad for them, and they are convinced to care about the muslims more than they care about their own people. And because of women's high agreeableness, they make choices based on what they believe other people will think about them emotionally. Women voting to open all borders and allow the flood of violent criminal animals, just because they don't want people to think that they are "racist." And for not other reason. There is no deep level of thinking happening.

The reason Europe is now filled with rape gangs and sharia law is mostly because of women voting for, funding, volunteering, and working to do everything they can to bring these in. A woman will distrust her own soul and her own psychic senses warning her of a danger, and will put herself into dangerous situations, just because she doesn't want other women to think that she is racist.

These political facts can not be ignored. Of course there are many worthless low testosterone weak men who also have worked to import all of the world's worst animal criminals into white countries. But it is nearly all women who are on that side. White men can try our hardest to protect our people, but it is not possible when the women work suicidally towards the death of our civilizations. Whatever the name of the specific groups are in each country, the side of communist jews working to extinct our people is always supported most highly by women. Their agreeableness means that their only thought is about other people thinking that they are good people, and they care nothing for facts or reality. The only thing it takes to trick them is to just say, "If you vote for us, you are a good person. And if you don't vote for us, you are a bad person." This is literally the only democrat argument and has been for decades. There are no facts, no logic, no examples, and no arguments needed. Woman brain just says "I need everyone to think I am a good person, so I need to vote for our own extinction because if I don't then it would be racist."

Of course there are some women who are smarter than this and who are not what I describe. It sounds like you are better than this. But the extreme majority of women vote in exactly the way I describe and for exactly those reasons. If you compare the voting trends between men and women, it is always the women who vote in the higher numbers to open the borders and bring in the rape gangs. Only for the reason of "I don't want people to say I'm racist." If you only had men voting, all of the borders of white countries would be closed and there would not be any muslim, criminal, rapist, or violent person allowed to come in.


Like many other tools, voting is a tool that can be very dangerous when it is used wrong. If a woman uses a chainsaw and is not strong enough to control it, she could end up accidentally cutting off her leg. If a woman is not mentally strong enough to use voting correctly, she could end up accidentally importing millions of rapists and murderers to burn our civilization to the ground and extinct our entire race. You see the voting is a much more dangerous tool than the chainsaw, because the chainsaw is only a threat to herself.


I will not say that women should not be allowed to vote. All I do is say true facts based on the statistics of how women usually vote almost always. Which makes it possible to say what problems we have that we would not have if things were different. All I can say is the right to vote should be determined by serious mental and psychological testing so that voters are logical, rational, intelligent, have at least a minimum IQ level, and most importantly have a low agreeableness level. Voters need to operate based on facts, truth, logic, and reality. Anybody who is only operating based on agreeableness, and by emotional reactions that were programmed by jewish emotional propaganda, should not be allowed to vote. There are both men and women who fit that description, but it is more often women.

Thank you
I believe if voting were limited to those directly affected by an issue, many of these problems could have been avoided. Matters concerning men should be decided by men, and those pertaining to women should be determined by women.

Women really don't have the time to learn everything about politics.
They think politicians don't lie.
Unfortunately politicians are really evil and use this against women.

Women are overworked these days.

The average woman has to study so hard,work outside,work at home,kill herself and spend the money she could buy 2 houses with just trying to become barbie_like pretty,find someone to marry,have children and raise them(This is the hardest part).
None of the things we do can be replaced by men so I don't blame them for not even trying to help out.

This is Gen Z lifestyle women have,I don't know about other generations but no other generation of women were treated like this.

We are called sex negative,puriteens and all that because we don't even have the time or energy to participate in what every other generation participated in,then decided it was wrong(when it was our turn).
Other generations could just party for two days with no stress and never cared about the consequences.

Technically we don't have any time to fact check everything these evil politicians say.We really don't have the time for that.

If politicians and people stop attacking women,women won't use their precious hard earned time to waste it on these politicians but they can't shut up about women. The only thing they talk about is women.
If you take the word woman away from them they don't know what to say.
They have turned women's rights and bodies into a battlefield.

Women should decide on what affects them directly,men should decide on what affects them directly.

 

[AristocraticDragon666]

It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Maxine and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

It is not true.

 

[Seeker in the Dark]

I hate “democracy” so much. Vote for shabbos goy #1 or shabbos goy #2, rinse and repeat for the last century or so, then wonder why nothing changes, at least not in a positive direction.

Jews understand how power really works(money + social influence over elites + brute force, not bitching/protesting or voting for approved goys) and that’s how they took over the whole West, especially the US. They explain clearly in the protocols.

If someone opposes the jews at a political level, they don’t do any of the approved cattle methods the Gentiles do, they try to buy the guy off first, then they try to tarnish their reputation and if it comes down to it they’ll try to assassinate them.

Please snap out of the democracy trance. It’s an illusion. Real change comes from real power, as I’ve explained above.

 

[Seeker in the Dark]

I hate “democracy” so much. Vote for shabbos goy #1 or shabbos goy #2, rinse and repeat for the last century or so, then wonder why nothing changes, at least not in a positive direction.

Jews understand how power really works(money + social influence over elites + brute force, not bitching/protesting or voting for approved goys) and that’s how they took over the whole West, especially the US. They explain clearly in the protocols.

If someone opposes the jews at a political level, they don’t do any of the approved cattle methods the Gentiles do, they try to buy the guy off first, then they try to tarnish their reputation and if it comes down to it they’ll try to assassinate them.

Please snap out of the democracy trance. It’s an illusion. Real change comes from real power, as I’ve explained above.

Even though I said all this, Trump MAY be an exception to the rule. We’ll see if voting for him truly improves things or not. I have some hope that’s he’s a good guy. He’s had to appease jews, as do all US leaders, but now that he’s in it seems he’s against all the warmongering and wants to deal peacefully with Iran rather than invade it.

 

[Ol argedco luciftias]

Even though I said all this, Trump MAY be an exception to the rule. We’ll see if voting for him truly improves things or not. I have some hope that’s he’s a good guy. He’s had to appease jews, as do all US leaders, but now that he’s in it seems he’s against all the warmongering and wants to deal peacefully with Iran rather than invade it.

Trump is exactly what you describe. Jews tried to ruin his reputation, they tried to destroy him by using the corrupt legal system, and they have tried multiple times to assassinate him. They have tried to destroy him in every possible way, using the entire force of their lying media companies, the entire force of corruption and evil within our government, and even the governments of other countries. There is nothing that they didn't try to try to destroy him. But it is lucky that we are able to vote so we were still able to elect him even when every jew and corrupt criminal did everything they could to get rid of him.

 

[616Taysha]

The whole message reeks of self-victimisation and feminism. ‘Oh, women are sooo oppressed! Rise, women! Let’s dismantle the patriarchy!’ - Marxist garbage right there.

Matters concerning men should be decided by men, and those pertaining to women should be determined by women

Doesn’t seem like it. It's a very narrow-minded way of thinking - you’re saying that Trump should not have passed the law forbidding men’s participation in women’s sport?

Women really don't have the time to learn everything about politics.
They think politicians don't lie.
Unfortunately politicians are really evil and use this against women.

Oh, the victim mindset. If those women - and I bet you’re talking about “I’m a strong, independent woman I don’t need no man” modern women type - are sooo poor and so oppressed, you may want to inundate yourself in watching tons of TikToks and Shorts where women brag about their poor choices and yet take no accountability.

Women are overworked these days.

‘Be like a man! Work as hard as a man! Have a career, have your own home, owe nothing to anybody! You choose, you go girl, you slay queen!” - feminists

And later this woman who succumbed to the feminist propaganda: “Where are all the good men?” Why would a feminist need a man, if she has become the very man she wants?

The average woman has to study so hard,work outside,work at home,kill herself and spend the money she could buy 2 houses with just trying to become barbie_like pretty,find someone to marry,have children and raise them(This is the hardest part).
None of the things we do can be replaced by men so I don't blame them for not even trying to help out.

You do realise that college degrees are worthless? And if a woman has a husband - the naughty h word for a feminist - they can split the bills? Share responsibilities? And why would any woman WANT to buy TWO houses? Unless she willingly divorces a rich man…

This barbie comment - why would you WANT to look like a plastic doll? Oh, right, because instead of listening to what men want, you listen to what your other girlies tell you men want. And who also know next to nothing.

No one is forcing you to have children - if you choose not to, that's fine. Did I mention that if children are not born, we as a species die? And do you know what wants our extinction? Right, the jews.

We are called sex negative,puriteens

You are called sex negative… by who? Victim mentality again.

Other generations could just party for two days with no stress and never cared about the consequences.

Do you actually KNOW anyone from other generations? Times were different, and people used to socialise without mobiles, without the need for constant validation. To say that GenY or GenX did not care about consequences is an outright lie. Too many ‘modern, independent’ women lead a promiscuous life because ‘it’s liberating, because feminism’ and all that.

Technically we don't have any time to fact check everything these evil politicians say.We really don't have the time for that.

What is it then that those modern, independent women are so preoccupied with? Preening? Because the hallmark of GenZ is being on-line 24/7. And ‘evil politicians’ to whom you constantly refer - who exactly do you have in mind?

If politicians and people stop attacking women,women won't use their precious hard earned time to waste it on these politicians but they can't shut up about women. The only thing they talk about is women.

Right, because women are weak, incapable and other such Marxist/feminist drivel.

If you’ve had any idea about politics and not espouse what you’ve learned in college, you’d know jews who are behind feminism have ALWAYS been against women. Jews are professional victims, and having imposed this deranged ideology upon women, have turned the sexes against one another.

So, after your rant and my rant, there is a way to reject this feminist nonsense:
https://www.deathofcommunism.com/feminism-the-war-against-women-and-family/
Educate yourself, and see that you are NOT a victim.

 

[Proshat]

Stop replying on my posts people.
You are wasting my time.
I just wrote a long comment that took 45 minutes to write because it was long as fuck and then I deleted it because I then realised this is never going to end.
As hard as this is I'm not going to answer to any of your replies.
I'd rather do something positive for God.
Bye

 

[Alexandros Iowno [TG]]

It is just a quote I read, not my opinion.

"People who can't defend themselves physically (women and low T men) parse information through a consensus filter as a safety mechanism. They do not ask "is this true", they ask "will others be OK with me thinking this is true". Which makes them very malleable to brute force manufactured consensus. If every screen they look at says the same thing they will adopt that position because their brain interprets it as everyone in the tribe believing it. Only high T males and anuerotypical people are actually free to parse new information with an objective "is this true?" filter. This is why a Republic of high status males is best for decision making. Democratic, but a democracy only for those who are free to think".

Of course it's a huge generalisation, since HPS Maxine and others were literally the opposite of this. But I wanted to know is there a basis in the general nature of women which fascilitates this behaviour? Or is it something purely individual soul level?

Yes, but it is not enough, one must go by other conditioners and overcoming limitations to not be bound by human safety limitations and societal constructs. To the degree that is is challenged, for better or worse yes. This is about the alchemy of the soul.

 

[Edward Lonsa]

I think they who wrote this quote forget [or purposefully silence down] one single thing: Feminine Power and Wisdom.

Or how then can they explain the fact that Russian women of older generations en mass protect their country from feminism on opinion level? Giving their daughters right perspective on belonging to men. Why are they not "manipulated better" by propaganda then?

Why then when Belarusian youth went to whole country rebellion, only elderly women did not and told openly into faces: this was color revolution [which it was] ? Same for Russian elderly women rejecting liberal parties and seeing them through for what they really are.

People of any sex who are frail and have to be silent are more wise and cunning than those who are not, because they early learn that they have to have "opinion for society" and "opinion for themselves" and these might be different. These are more logically and critically thinking people, actually. And they posses more power than idiotic rebels who can be easily deceived and pawned. As such they are more capable to rule. Being weak and therefore secretive is not equal to being corrupted. Not to mess real corruption and working behind the scenes.

According the logic of the quote 99% of Medieval Alchemists who did not openly worship Pagan Gods during inquisition era were "corrupted" just because they had to conceal their opinion.

They also forget or purposefully silence that rebellious men also "agree" to many things women do not: these are just opposite and purely male things such as becoming self-sufficient, going to war, trying to survive alone, having to fight all the time to get bruises etc. - men "agree" to it all. He agrees with being a man. She agrees with being a woman. He agrees with difficulties and to build himself from zero - and through this he wins, she agrees to belong to the stronger and to depend - and through this she wins. He is a Hero, she is a Reward for a Hero. They both "agree" to their own unique paths (and both can be easily ruled through them when these paths are on the lower octave).

Women rule the world by ruling men who rule the world. Women maintain and govern men who maintain and govern the world. Because only Masculine power can rule the outer world, it is true. Yet only Feminine Power can rule the inner world of a man, this is also true. When woman rules the outer world as sole Czarina she rules through her feminine power as well - through her men, army, through her frailty and belonging. To understand it just watch how magnet rules iron filings on youtube making any shape out of them. She does not need to be man herself because she HAS a man (or whole country of men) at her disposal. We are natural weapons of each other, bulwarks of each other and guardians of each other.

Jewish MGTOW, if you read their books that are written by jewish envious women, they hates our Gentile Women exactly for their Feminine Power. Jews themselves know that woman is a greatest weapon of a man and vice versa and they wish to deprive us of our greatest weapons and thus deprive our nations of their power. Jewish women teach Gentile men now to hate their women for their beauty and their natural powers instead of embracing them and the fact that your wife will forever guide you TO YOUR OWN BENEFIT because she is on YOUR side, unlike kikes. MGTOW tries to deceive men to refuse their women's help. As well as feminism destroy women through teaching them to refuse their husbands owning them - to THEIR OWN BENEFIT because owning means protection and fighting for her to death.

Kazakhstan was forever shamanic culture venerating Tengri till 19 century and their women still remember how they cleansed their men. It was normal practice - all their women could easily cleanse aura and soul of their loved ones. It was normal for a woman to perform the analogues of all our everyday meditations we do now, on their families. Women played role of Spiritual Guardians to their families. While men were Physical Guardians they should have been. This was just very normal and no one even thought that it might be ever different. Tell these men of MGTOW and they will laugh at you. As well as Kazakh women will laugh reading this thread.

As for that medieval xian law, nature does not need kike-made insecure laws to maintain her creed: men by nature have absolute power over women, their life their death, no laws are needed for it: you live under one roof with someone stronger - you can be strangled any moment, end of discussion. The same for mother-child relationship and for all others. Equality does not exist and it is a GOOD thing. And guess what? No European man did honor killing anyway, whatever hoahide laws inquisition wrote for them. Instead they died in duels for their wives' honor. Why? Because we are not ruled by kikes like feminists are. Laws has as much power over people as people let them to have. While yes, men had, have and will forever have 100% physical power over women. Why?

Because this is what Real Women want of us and because this is the only way how men can 100% guarantee women's safety. This is like with a developer: he has to have a full access to the server to guarantee its safety. Real men fully understand that if their woman got hurt - it is on them. They failed to save her and they are to be accountable for this. It stays onto their soul - because Gods gave us responsibility over our women, their life, health and overall well-being for a reason. Because we are alone in physical world who can maintain it. If women suffer - it is upon us. OF COURSE if taking away not only vote rights but any rights at all is needed to save her and protect her health and well-being [for example if she went insane], this is what we must do, this is part of our responsibility and duty. If we did not and woman suffered because this, we are cuckolded race traitors to be hang. We still follow the order of our Loves as we always did but that of their higher Godly selves, not that of lower feminist apehood. THIS is civilized and the only thing that is. And civilization is being built by manpower not by cuckoldry or race treason. Any woman with a bit of brain understands it and stands firm for her man's power. Because it is just a natural rule every animal every insect understands: the more powerful your man is = the more power he has to protect you and guarantee your well-being.

Jews erasing History of the West: “Europe has no its own Culture” Hoax. Answer of the Aryan – White Death of islam

whitedeathofislam.deathofcommunism.com

Vice versa too: men's egos are granted into women's hands and women are responsible for their men's feeling of success and ownership of the world, overall power and victory. Because only Woman's Beauty, the Beauty of Feminine Soul can lead to true victory. Woman feels fault if her boy did not win. This is why legendary widow's loyalty. This is why women jump into men's burial fire - to be with their Lords in it.

 

[616Taysha]

Ooof, a long post By Edward, but WORTH reading.

Giving their daughters right perspective on belonging to men

Oh the evil ‘belong to’ phrase - feminists see it as ‘enslaved by’ - which is obviously far from the truth. In the past for a woman wearing a wedding ring was a sign of pride, NOT enslavement.

Jewish women teach Gentile men now to hate their women for their beauty and their natural powers instead of embracing them

Not really as far as MGTOW (true though, we are suckers for beauty - NATURAL one, mind you), for now it has evolved into “I’m not getting married to avoid being robbed by the state when - mostly WHEN - she divorces me.” With the rise of promiscuity among women, such females have tons of sexual partners (no, not just 2-3, but in tens, sometimes hundreds). Along the way they can get pregnant with a few men and well, decide to leech them via child care. This in itself is detrimental for a child - having no male authority figure, no one to set boundaries.

A side note: I know this is anecdotal, but a male boy who has a lesbian mother and only a limited contact with his uncle looks unbalanced, is effeminate and may have a hard time forming relationships.

Gaoing back to casual sex - it is the very reason why men are discouraged from having it, and even then to be careful when getting married or commiting to the woman, because when married, she may one day (after years of marriage) decide she “does not feel happy” (because things aren’t as they used to be BEFORE getting married) so no-fault divorce due to “irreconcilable differences”.

Why am I mentioning divorce? Feminism is more sneaky than one may think. It has seeped into laws and everyday life alongside all the #metoo, cancellation, blasting on TikTok and what not.

teaching them to refuse their husbands owning them - to THEIR OWN BENEFIT because owning means protection and fighting for her to death

I guess 'to their own detriment' - to women it is detrimental, because if she is owned she gets protection.

Aaaan YES. “If you are my woman, I will go to the end of the world to fight for you - because you are so priceless to me”. The only thing that is required is fidelity. Alas, feminism teaches promiscuity. No, males and females DIFFER. A woman cannot be like a man. The way they have sex differs.

Real men fully understand that if their woman got hurt - it is on them

I hear feminists having a stroke, a heart attack and tearing their hair off xD Though here I’d use the past tense: “it was on them”. A woman having no husband, no boyfriend can only blame herself. But it is a woman who will have the state’s compassion after having made poor choices.

women are responsible for their men's feeling of success

Presently this may not be the case. A man is advised to fight on his own and can find fulfillment in his work, passions, making himself better. An average woman will be shown compassion more often than a man. "Man up", "be a man" - but guess what, we take pride in going solo, whereas women are more social creatures. Both of these are advantages, but with feminism poisining our minds, these strengths can be taken advantage of.