Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

Is Helena Blavatsky legit?

HP. Zevios Metathronos said:
Similar types to Blavatsky right now are people like Pinkham, who essentially use spiritual knowledge and even Zeus's name to promote bastardization of the races, and pretend this is some sort of divine mission into it.

I was reading some years ago Pinkham's material such as "The Return of Serpents of Wisdom" and I saw he was legit in many things he wrote but I didn't like the acceptance of the Yehubor and Hebrew materials he has in his books.
 
Drakon said:
HP. Zevios Metathronos said:
Similar types to Blavatsky right now are people like Pinkham, who essentially use spiritual knowledge and even Zeus's name to promote bastardization of the races, and pretend this is some sort of divine mission into it.

I was reading some years ago Pinkham's material such as "The Return of Serpents of Wisdom" and I saw he was legit in many things he wrote but I didn't like the acceptance of the Yehubor and Hebrew materials he has in his books.

He is a very knowledgable person and that is a respectable quality, but the rest, and how he extolls yehuborim, and he refuses to anknowldge that all of the damage done to the actual Serpent religion, ie Zevism, came from yehuborim, is just reeking that he is dishonest or too new age to see the facts.

At his knowledge level he either knows or he is a shill. There is no middle ground here.
 
" Pinkham"
I fell for him around 2013/14 with his 'serpents of wisdom'. It all seemed well and good but the universalism reeked of disinfo and this turned me away from 'gnosticism' altogether.
According to you what sources are trustworthy as a primer in 'gnostic' philosophy/hermeticism or whatever it may be called? I have printed off the J.O.S info but am always seeking outside sources
 
loki88 said:
" Pinkham"
I fell for him around 2013/14 with his 'serpents of wisdom'. It all seemed well and good but the universalism reeked of disinfo and this turned me away from 'gnosticism' altogether.
According to you what sources are trustworthy as a primer in 'gnostic' philosophy/hermeticism or whatever it may be called? I have printed off the J.O.S info but am always seeking outside sources

Read whatever you want and consider you should read, but always be conscious when doing it, and you should be fine. There are a lot of books like the Kybalion which contain some actual knowledge. With all occult manuscripts at this point, it is all lukewarm. There is unavoidably a huge amount of disinfo into them, and that is on purpose.

Eventually daily meditation can help clear the fog.
 
Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?
 
loki88 said:
Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?
The initiation into hermetics book would be good for someone who is not an Zevism but we don’t need it. Some of the exercises in there are on the ToZ meditation page anyways.
 
Bardon was a member of several groups one of them was a small Zevist group that was run by an actual member of a Zevist lodge. The knowledge that Bardon put into Hermetic's was taken from that group. I wrote an article of this its in the archives.

https://www.ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=24&t=18139

loki88 said:
Franz Barton has been recommended here frequently. Is his work legitimate(not kabbalistically corrupted)?
 
thanks I need to figure things out. I assume Giordano Bruno is a legit source to? Is there a 'grocery list' of sources for neophytes independantly of J.O.S content in case the latter is offline/scrapped by zog? I'm thinking about compiling a library
 

Official Temple of Zeus Links

Back
Top