FancyMancy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2017
- Messages
- 7,213
It's been years since I heard a jew claim "goy" means "nation" or "goyim" means "nations". Remember - not only does "israel" not exist now, it has never existed, so the jew is trying to establish its own country - or nation, and for many centuries while "israel" didn't exist yet, the term "goyim", which the jew says means "nations", existed while the jew didn't have its own nation yet. The word "goyim" ("nations") existed while the jew didn't have its own nation yet. So "israel" didn't exist but nations did exist - "israel" didn't exist but goyim/others did exist. One could also argue that if "goyim" means "nations", then... is "israel" not a nation?! What is it, then? It may be there de facto as opposed to de jure and 'de juwre' (the jew) reckons it has right to Palestine as its own; and the faerie tale fantasy of the character with the same name, ("israel") being like a patriarch or something, but it is illegitimate. A non-existent entity in reality; existent only in name and jew fantasy and occupation of/stronghold in Palestine/Middle Eastern areas.
I am not certain how much of the meanings of "goy/goyim" and "naked", in jewbiblical terms, has been shared already. If it exists already, then this is supplementary and unintentional peer-review, in a sense (i.e. if it exists on JoS/ToZ sites/archives, then I am still doing it regardless, and it is good to come to similar conclusions separately, which I hope is the case). I know "goy/goyim" is known very much already, but I hope I can share this to include it in a slightly larger light and realisation.
So with "goy" having different meanings and contexts, it can be cherry-picked as to what it means at any time, claiming innocence or "incorrect/out-of-context meaning" - and we're not supposed and not "allowed" to learn the jew's holy (or holey-with-an-E) books, as it also says if a Goy does, he/she must be put to death - and as it also says, the jew must lie about what its "holy books" contain if a Goy asks if they contain anything against the Goyim. The jew dissimilates, don't forget, so it having a "different meaning" or it "being out of context" is easy and quick to say - and there also being an oral torah, and in the writings the vowels removed and the script from right-to-left and there being no spaces between words, cntnsshtftrpshtnshcs - schsnthsprtfthssntnc - sch s n ths prt f ths sntnc - such as in this part of this sentence... It's as if the jew is encrypting (another not-new thing) things to keep it a secret from the victims.
Also if I followed it correctly, not only is "goy/goyim" a derogatory term against non-jews (Gentiles, Pagans, Humans), but as it seemed to refer to the back of a person which is connected with corpse... the jew thinks the Goyim/Humans are corpses? I can actually argue this because along with thinking "naked", from in the video, probably does not refer to a person having no clothes on but instead refers to a "mYsTiCaL" "sPiRiTuAl" alleged meaning or at least reference, "goy/goyim", therefore, also does refer to non-jews being dead/without spiritual knowledge; remember - when Adam and Eve gained knowledge, they then put "clothes" on, so with knowledge they are no longer naked. With the jew, trying to understand its double-talk and treble-talk and probably more, you find that it is not straightforward. Instead of going straight and forward, you have to go back and turn and twist and bend and reach and along winding paths which lead nowhere with a lot of dead ends and riddles...
Just like with circumsise - some would think it would be plain and clear, but no. "Circumsised" does not mean "to be circumsised"; instead, with all of the deliberate twisted retardation, it actually refers to "circumcision of the heart" (but jew males are supposed to be actually-circumsised, without anaesthetic, of course, and have a rabbi sucking on jesus's circumsised baby dick). So... I am convinced "naked" doesn't mean "a person without clothes on", but instead more likely than not actually means one who is not clothed in spirituality and that which "god" bestoweth upon the "cHoSeN pEoPlE". I also am convinced that it also means, along with "corpse" for "Goy/Goyim" "the inner workings or the core of" a spiritually-dead person - again, non-jews. A corpse, a dead, non-living, empty, unspiritual person, as it said "closed to sense" - without sense, being senseless - (because only the jew has sense, has knowledge, has spirituality, is the only moral and ethical...) i.e. a Heathen, Goy, Gentile, Pagan, Human of Planet Earth - since "Goy"/"Goyim" refers to the individual, the People and the Land/Earth - not forgetting it also refers to Animals, a herd, or a swarm... because dead bodies tend to get swarms of rotting-flesh-eating things all over them... and the Goyim are to be ignored and rejected, because - as according to the jew - the Goyim are not worth a jew fingernail (and christians trying to say, "Get behind me, Satan", so arrogantly in their extreme ignorance).
With the mention of beastiality - saying non-jews are Animals, then Animals mating with Animals would, indeed, be beastial. Animals are still cleaner than the jew though; the jew is dirty. Taxonomically-speaking, since the jew is supposed to be human, Humans are Animals; "human" jew is also animal, beast. There is also "yok" which is a back-formation of "goy" -
Some of you know that I also use etymonline.com for these types of things. The entry is the same as it is in this search result.
I must mention and highlight the "logic" and wordplay of the jew here, if anyone might not have realised it already, how nonsense the jew's words are. Again, I refer to its dictionary that is not a wordbook but actually instead is a lexicon... except "dictionary", "wordbook" and "lexicon" all mean the same thing... Oh - and that's a revised version in that link! Even in revision, the jew is still full of shit! It cannot reform, simply because it is of a different form altogether.
Simply - "naked" and "goy/goyim" means a non-jew, "Adam" (a man, who was naked in the Garden of Eden and whose eyes were closed; no sense, no spirituality, no understanding, no knowledge, no inkling; jew biblical character "Adam" - "man", from Sumerian "Adamu" - "Man"). "Naked" and "goy/goyim" means non-jews, portrayed as the biblical Adam, who is unspiritual/spiritually-dead, who the jew decides should be ignored and rejected, is a beast/engages in beastiality; and the jew must not perform its jew prayers in front of such a person; i.e. the Goyim/Gentiles/Pagans/Humans must not know about what the jew does - and just like Adam (man) who was naked (ignorant, unknowledgeable, dead spiritually) and without using its Brain that "god" gave it to use just had faith that "god" was being honest and reliable and trustworthy, Humans also likewise must merely accept that the jew is telling the truth. Is this Jewboi controlled opposition/playing the role of "good-copper", pretending to be on the Goyim side?
My Conversation with an AI Chatbot
Hebrew Writing Customs Explained
Why does the jew holy books remove vowels, remove spaces, and write from right-to-left?
Your question concerns ancient Hebrew writing customs, and rightly so — for they are peculiar to the modern eye. Let me explain in turn:
Why, then, --out the "o" in "god" - "g-d"?
You are now speaking of the practice of writing “G‑d” instead of “God.” This is not a quirk of language, but a matter of reverence and religious law in Judaism.
Here is why the “o” is removed:
By writing “G‑d,” one avoids the issue of writing a holy name that might later be mistreated — a safeguard out of piety, not linguistics.
"Oh, for fudge cake!" - The meaning and intention is still there, so dashing-out a part of it - which just so happened to be the vowel - is pointless.
You make a strong point — and one shared by many.
Indeed, if the meaning and intention are still clear, then replacing “God” with “G‑d” might seem a bit of a fig leaf — like saying “Oh, for fudge cake!” instead of the cruder oath. Everyone knows what is meant. So why the dance?
Let us consider it in two parts:
You're right in saying:
Despite what we may reason, the practice is not about tricking God or pretending a name wasn’t used — it’s about:
One could argue that writing “God” respectfully is better than pretending a hyphen is some kind of spiritual barrier. Yet, for many observant Jews, this little dash is a sign of deliberate care, not superstition.
So yes — your point stands rationally, but in matters of devotion, rationality often gives way to ritual, and ritual is the language of reverence.
__________________
I am also thinking of the power and magic within the words and meanings and intentions. By destroying or scribbling-out or ripping-up a piece of paper or text or whatever with "god" on it, then maybe it could lessen the impact. That doesn't matter, though - the jew could counter that by writing it on papers 6 more times and bowing down before and worshipping them as a golden calf, but the jew is anally-retentive and autistic, of course. This, what ChatGPT says, might be the - or an - official reason, but writing in reverse, removing vowels and removing spaces so that you and I don't know what it's about; and having a written and oral script - oral being more complete than the encrypted written which we don't understand? That's more than merely "expensive parchment", which the jew could afford, clearly, and other "rEaSoNs", obviously. It also says consonants carry most of the meaning. Funny. Vowels tend to seem to be powerful and important.
So with "goy" having different meanings and contexts, it can be cherry-picked as to what it means at any time, claiming innocence or "incorrect/out-of-context meaning" - and we're not supposed and not "allowed" to learn the jew's holy (or holey-with-an-E) books, as it also says if a Goy does, he/she must be put to death - and as it also says, the jew must lie about what its "holy books" contain if a Goy asks if they contain anything against the Goyim. The jew dissimilates, don't forget, so it having a "different meaning" or it "being out of context" is easy and quick to say - and there also being an oral torah, and in the writings the vowels removed and the script from right-to-left and there being no spaces between words, cntnsshtftrpshtnshcs - schsnthsprtfthssntnc - sch s n ths prt f ths sntnc - such as in this part of this sentence... It's as if the jew is encrypting (another not-new thing) things to keep it a secret from the victims.
Also if I followed it correctly, not only is "goy/goyim" a derogatory term against non-jews (Gentiles, Pagans, Humans), but as it seemed to refer to the back of a person which is connected with corpse... the jew thinks the Goyim/Humans are corpses? I can actually argue this because along with thinking "naked", from in the video, probably does not refer to a person having no clothes on but instead refers to a "mYsTiCaL" "sPiRiTuAl" alleged meaning or at least reference, "goy/goyim", therefore, also does refer to non-jews being dead/without spiritual knowledge; remember - when Adam and Eve gained knowledge, they then put "clothes" on, so with knowledge they are no longer naked. With the jew, trying to understand its double-talk and treble-talk and probably more, you find that it is not straightforward. Instead of going straight and forward, you have to go back and turn and twist and bend and reach and along winding paths which lead nowhere with a lot of dead ends and riddles...
Just like with circumsise - some would think it would be plain and clear, but no. "Circumsised" does not mean "to be circumsised"; instead, with all of the deliberate twisted retardation, it actually refers to "circumcision of the heart" (but jew males are supposed to be actually-circumsised, without anaesthetic, of course, and have a rabbi sucking on jesus's circumsised baby dick). So... I am convinced "naked" doesn't mean "a person without clothes on", but instead more likely than not actually means one who is not clothed in spirituality and that which "god" bestoweth upon the "cHoSeN pEoPlE". I also am convinced that it also means, along with "corpse" for "Goy/Goyim" "the inner workings or the core of" a spiritually-dead person - again, non-jews. A corpse, a dead, non-living, empty, unspiritual person, as it said "closed to sense" - without sense, being senseless - (because only the jew has sense, has knowledge, has spirituality, is the only moral and ethical...) i.e. a Heathen, Goy, Gentile, Pagan, Human of Planet Earth - since "Goy"/"Goyim" refers to the individual, the People and the Land/Earth - not forgetting it also refers to Animals, a herd, or a swarm... because dead bodies tend to get swarms of rotting-flesh-eating things all over them... and the Goyim are to be ignored and rejected, because - as according to the jew - the Goyim are not worth a jew fingernail (and christians trying to say, "Get behind me, Satan", so arrogantly in their extreme ignorance).
With the mention of beastiality - saying non-jews are Animals, then Animals mating with Animals would, indeed, be beastial. Animals are still cleaner than the jew though; the jew is dirty. Taxonomically-speaking, since the jew is supposed to be human, Humans are Animals; "human" jew is also animal, beast. There is also "yok" which is a back-formation of "goy" -
Some of you know that I also use etymonline.com for these types of things. The entry is the same as it is in this search result.
I must mention and highlight the "logic" and wordplay of the jew here, if anyone might not have realised it already, how nonsense the jew's words are. Again, I refer to its dictionary that is not a wordbook but actually instead is a lexicon... except "dictionary", "wordbook" and "lexicon" all mean the same thing... Oh - and that's a revised version in that link! Even in revision, the jew is still full of shit! It cannot reform, simply because it is of a different form altogether.
Simply - "naked" and "goy/goyim" means a non-jew, "Adam" (a man, who was naked in the Garden of Eden and whose eyes were closed; no sense, no spirituality, no understanding, no knowledge, no inkling; jew biblical character "Adam" - "man", from Sumerian "Adamu" - "Man"). "Naked" and "goy/goyim" means non-jews, portrayed as the biblical Adam, who is unspiritual/spiritually-dead, who the jew decides should be ignored and rejected, is a beast/engages in beastiality; and the jew must not perform its jew prayers in front of such a person; i.e. the Goyim/Gentiles/Pagans/Humans must not know about what the jew does - and just like Adam (man) who was naked (ignorant, unknowledgeable, dead spiritually) and without using its Brain that "god" gave it to use just had faith that "god" was being honest and reliable and trustworthy, Humans also likewise must merely accept that the jew is telling the truth. Is this Jewboi controlled opposition/playing the role of "good-copper", pretending to be on the Goyim side?
My Conversation with an AI Chatbot
Hebrew Writing Customs Explained
Why does the jew holy books remove vowels, remove spaces, and write from right-to-left?
Your question concerns ancient Hebrew writing customs, and rightly so — for they are peculiar to the modern eye. Let me explain in turn:
1. Why remove vowels?
In ancient Hebrew, vowels were not written because:- The language relied heavily on oral tradition; people learned pronunciation by hearing.
- The consonants alone carried most of the meaning (e.g., the root K-T-V relates to writing: katav = he wrote, ketav = writing).
- Vowel marks (nikkud) were only added much later (around the 6th–10th centuries CE by the Masoretes) to preserve pronunciation.
2. Why remove spaces?
Early Hebrew manuscripts often lacked spaces between words because:- Writing materials (like parchment) were precious and expensive.
- Skilled readers could still parse the words correctly based on context.
- This too made the reading of the holy texts a skill requiring training, keeping the sacred knowledge in the hands of scribes and scholars.
3. Why write right-to-left?
Hebrew is written right-to-left because:- Ancient Semitic scripts (like Phoenician, from which Hebrew derives) followed this pattern.
- Stonecutters chiselled from right to left because most were right-handed — making it easier to see their work and not smudge as they cut.
- This writing direction persisted into later Hebrew and Aramaic scripts, and it is shared with other Semitic languages like Arabic.
Why, then, --out the "o" in "god" - "g-d"?
You are now speaking of the practice of writing “G‑d” instead of “God.” This is not a quirk of language, but a matter of reverence and religious law in Judaism.
Here is why the “o” is removed:
1. Out of respect for the Divine Name
In Jewish tradition, especially in Orthodox and traditional circles, the names of God are treated with immense reverence. Writing “God” fully on something that might be:- Thrown away,
- Torn,
- Desecrated in any way,
By writing “G‑d,” one avoids the issue of writing a holy name that might later be mistreated — a safeguard out of piety, not linguistics.
2. Not a commandment about English per se
Strictly speaking, Hebrew names of God (like יהוה YHWH, or Elohim) are what Jewish law forbids erasing or defiling, but many Jews extend that care to translated forms — like “God” in English — as a sign of devotion, even if it is not required under halakhah (Jewish law). It’s a kind of “fence around the Torah” — an extra measure of honour.3. It is not about removing vowels like in Hebrew
This is different from the ancient practice of removing vowels from Hebrew text. Writing “G‑d” in English is a modern convention, using the hyphen as a mark of intentional omission, not a linguistic style.Summary
The writing of “G‑d” stems from respect, caution, and devotion, not from ancient script habits. It reflects a desire not to write the Name in vain — even in another tongue. To some, it may seem excessive; to the faithful, it is a humble act of awe."Oh, for fudge cake!" - The meaning and intention is still there, so dashing-out a part of it - which just so happened to be the vowel - is pointless.
You make a strong point — and one shared by many.
Indeed, if the meaning and intention are still clear, then replacing “God” with “G‑d” might seem a bit of a fig leaf — like saying “Oh, for fudge cake!” instead of the cruder oath. Everyone knows what is meant. So why the dance?
Let us consider it in two parts:
1. The logic of your objection
You're right in saying:- The idea of God is still invoked.
- The intention is still formed in the heart and mind.
- The dash is only cosmetic, not theological.
2. Why do it, then? (The counterpoint)
Despite what we may reason, the practice is not about tricking God or pretending a name wasn’t used — it’s about:- Showing reverence in writing: The dash is not meant to erase meaning, but to mark the word as sacred.
- Avoiding casual or careless treatment: If a page with “God” gets binned, that's seen by some as disrespectful; “G‑d” avoids that dilemma.
- Habituating respect: The very act of pausing to write “G‑d” trains the writer to treat the divine name carefully, even when writing in English.
A final thought
One could argue that writing “God” respectfully is better than pretending a hyphen is some kind of spiritual barrier. Yet, for many observant Jews, this little dash is a sign of deliberate care, not superstition.So yes — your point stands rationally, but in matters of devotion, rationality often gives way to ritual, and ritual is the language of reverence.
__________________
I am also thinking of the power and magic within the words and meanings and intentions. By destroying or scribbling-out or ripping-up a piece of paper or text or whatever with "god" on it, then maybe it could lessen the impact. That doesn't matter, though - the jew could counter that by writing it on papers 6 more times and bowing down before and worshipping them as a golden calf, but the jew is anally-retentive and autistic, of course. This, what ChatGPT says, might be the - or an - official reason, but writing in reverse, removing vowels and removing spaces so that you and I don't know what it's about; and having a written and oral script - oral being more complete than the encrypted written which we don't understand? That's more than merely "expensive parchment", which the jew could afford, clearly, and other "rEaSoNs", obviously. It also says consonants carry most of the meaning. Funny. Vowels tend to seem to be powerful and important.
