Maitreya Website

[Takemikazuchi]

Brothers and Sisters, I ask for your help. I want to out the right teachings into Buddha, I am an oriental SS I have been here for many moons, I am oriental born and raised in the west. I know how orientals from the east think. I’ve always lived two lives one life at home with my immediate family and one life out in the world which I live. Not many Buddhist will abandon Buddha. Just like how not many Christian’s will abandon Jesus. But the difference with Buddhism is it is salvageable. I understand it’s easy to abandon when it doesn’t resonate. But I belive it’s worth a shot. In Buddhist text it’s written when Buddhas teaching cease to benefit the world the last Buddha Maitreya will come, many argue that his teachings will be the same as buddah, but if Buddha’s teachings are sufficient maitreya wouldn’t be necessary. I belive maitreya acts as a safety net? Many have claimed to be maitreya but the Buddhist authorities shot them down. My plan to prevent this is by using a website. I want to run it through. No offense, many of you are from the west and are trying to get back yourselfs from the enemy I am in the same situation Buddah is Satan after all but just with corrupted teachings. I can’t fully see how I will do this. But I will need help, is Buddhism just a joke? Literally only Buddha’s teachings are corrupted if we can straighten everything out, would it not be worth it?

Ave Satanas

 

[Hárbarðr]

But the difference with Buddhism is it is salvageable.
...
No offense, many of you are from the west and are trying to get back yourselfs from the enemy I am in the same situation Buddah is Satan after all but just with corrupted teachings. I can’t fully see how I will do this.

I haven't seen anyone say that he is Zeus/Satan. "Buddha" never existed. The entire religion of Buddhism is a scam, it has nothing to do with ancient teachings.

Buddhism

Question #2992: why do u people say buddhism also is a lie

In india there was something called caste system where one higher community brahmins and other high communities did NOT allow low caste people (called untouchable) for any basic rights ..Buddhism came and abolished caste system and took all the good points of sanathana dharma ..why then is...

ancient-forums.com

It's been mentioned that Hinduism is corrupted, not Buddhism.

In Buddhist text it’s written when Buddhas teaching cease to benefit the world the last Buddha Maitreya will come, many argue that his teachings will be the same as buddah, but if Buddha’s teachings are sufficient maitreya wouldn’t be necessary. I belive maitreya acts as a safety net? Many have claimed to be maitreya but the Buddhist authorities shot them down. My plan to prevent this is by using a website.

This is very silly. If I write in a book that a big scary monster will come and eat you if you don't run around your house at 3 am 12 times screaming at the top of your voice, will you automatically believe it and just run around screaming in the middle of the night every day because I said it?

Or maybe just realize what it's written in the buddhist texts is just pure nonsense and superstition. The other Buddhas didn't exist, Gautama was fictitious so nor will the next one ever come because he isn't real. The "Buddhist text" is just wrong, just like the Bible is wrong about "Jesus" coming again (he never existed anyway).

 

[Takemikazuchi]

So everyone is going be be toz? Study before you comment, there’s plenty of sermons stating Buddha is Satan but with a Jewish soul, the took his picture.

 

[Takemikazuchi]

I haven't seen anyone say that he is Zeus/Satan. "Buddha" never existed. The entire religion of Buddhism is a scam, it has nothing to do with ancient teachings.

Buddhism

Question #2992: why do u people say buddhism also is a lie

In india there was something called caste system where one higher community brahmins and other high communities did NOT allow low caste people (called untouchable) for any basic rights ..Buddhism came and abolished caste system and took all the good points of sanathana dharma ..why then is...

ancient-forums.com

It's been mentioned that Hinduism is corrupted, not Buddhism.



This is very silly. If I write in a book that a big scary monster will come and eat you if you don't run around your house at 3 am 12 times screaming at the top of your voice, will you automatically believe it and just run around screaming in the middle of the night every day because I said it?

Or maybe just realize what it's written in the buddhist texts is just pure nonsense and superstition. The other Buddhas didn't exist, Gautama was fictitious so nor will the next one ever come because he isn't real. The "Buddhist text" is just wrong, just like the Bible is wrong about "Jesus" coming again (he never existed anyway).

Buddah is literally God of Buddhism, whatever come out his mouth will turn every rock. The enemy literally knows this, came in killed everyone. And changed Buddha ( Satan/Enki ) teachings. Which is why maitrya was necessary, so he can correct them. Why the enemy did this or if the Gods had a hand, I don’t know. But that much I know, and with a site we can fix it. Simplying reading the “Buddah” quotes online with SS lens’s and as if not more retarded that the quotes xians use to get them through their days.

 

[Ĥl·lĥæ]

Buddha is not Zeus.
Trying to see Buddhism through the lens of the zeitgeist will take away all of Buddhism's distinctiveness.

After this buddhasasana, the buddhas and bodhisattvas (after billions of years)
will discuss his coming and how to pass on the teachings again.

I don't know if it could be Maitreya alone.
We don't know.

Gods are one thing

Buddhas are something else.

Talk about shamanism mixed with Buddhism if you want. But try not to distract from the root.

 

[Ĥl·lĥæ]

zeitgeist .

Zevism*

 

[Norseman]

Was the Buddha a verifiable historical person? And was his enlightenment a historical event? The plain truth is that there is no documentation of the life of the Buddha outside Buddhist scriptures. And the earliest physical evidence that there was ever such a person dates to the reign of Ashoka, about 268 to 232 BCE. Dates of the life of the Buddha vary, but they range from about 567 to 487 BCE to as recently as 448 to 368 BCE. So there is no physical evidence that dates to his probable lifetime.

Further, the early Buddhism scriptures — our only source of information about the Buddha — for the most part were not committed to writing until the 1st century BCE. Instead, they were preserved by being memorized and chanted. This led to a number of different chanting traditions, in different dialects, and in places this resulted in wildly different versions of the same scripture. And we have no way to tell which version is closest to an “original.” Even so, the basic, foundational doctrines are presented consistently in them. See “Will Ancient Gandharan Scrolls Change Buddhist History?” for a more in-depth look at the origins of and issues with the early scriptures.

I wrote in my book The Circle of the Way: A Concise History of Zen from the Buddha to the Modern World (Shambhala, 2019) that most academic historians appear to regard the Buddha as more of a hypothesis than a person. They think someone was the originator of the foundational teachings, but they can’t say anything for certain about that person. The story of the life of the Buddha appears to have evolved over a few centuries, reaching its classic form in the epic poem Buddhacarita, composed about 100 CE. The story came to be stuffed with supernatural elements that many modern Buddhists prefer to disregard, although others still place great importance in them. At least some of the non-supernatural parts of the story are unlikely. For example, the Buddha is portrayed as the son of a king. But historians today say that his clan, the Shakya, didn’t appear to have had kings during his lifetime.

Last updated on: December 7, 2024 at 10:59 am, by Barbara O'Brien

In other words, there is no historical proof that Buddha ever existed. The same goes for Christianity; the three main tenets of Christian belief is "The Immaculate Conception", "The Resurrection", and "The Ascension". All meta-physical religious events, that have no historic proof, and are an essential requirement of FAITH.

We here at ToZ, know Zeus and our Gods exist as a daily living proof with our empowerment of the soul and direct spiritual relationship with Them on our journey to the Godhood.

 

[Takemikazuchi]

Buddha is not Zeus.
Trying to see Buddhism through the lens of the zeitgeist will take away all of Buddhism's distinctiveness.

After this buddhasasana, the buddhas and bodhisattvas (after billions of years)
will discuss his coming and how to pass on the teachings again.

I don't know if it could be Maitreya alone.
We don't know.

Gods are one thing

Buddhas are something else.

Talk about shamanism mixed with Buddhism if you want. But try not to distract from the root.

Agreed, Buddah is not Zeus, but Zeus is Satan. I don’t know who the new priests are nowadays but a few years ago Satan was Satan now Baal is Satan. I was mistaken Zeus is Baal, Satan is still Satan(Enki) regardless Buddah was/is our Gods, just In Eastern cultures.

Baal was Posiden, now he is Zeus. Then Satan was Poseidon. It’s makes no difference is Buddah is Zeus or Poseidon. His teachings are of the Kikes, only his corpse is holy.

 

[Takemikazuchi]

Was the Buddha a verifiable historical person? And was his enlightenment a historical event? The plain truth is that there is no documentation of the life of the Buddha outside Buddhist scriptures. And the earliest physical evidence that there was ever such a person dates to the reign of Ashoka, about 268 to 232 BCE. Dates of the life of the Buddha vary, but they range from about 567 to 487 BCE to as recently as 448 to 368 BCE. So there is no physical evidence that dates to his probable lifetime.

Further, the early Buddhism scriptures — our only source of information about the Buddha — for the most part were not committed to writing until the 1st century BCE. Instead, they were preserved by being memorized and chanted. This led to a number of different chanting traditions, in different dialects, and in places this resulted in wildly different versions of the same scripture. And we have no way to tell which version is closest to an “original.” Even so, the basic, foundational doctrines are presented consistently in them. See “Will Ancient Gandharan Scrolls Change Buddhist History?” for a more in-depth look at the origins of and issues with the early scriptures.

I wrote in my book The Circle of the Way: A Concise History of Zen from the Buddha to the Modern World (Shambhala, 2019) that most academic historians appear to regard the Buddha as more of a hypothesis than a person. They think someone was the originator of the foundational teachings, but they can’t say anything for certain about that person. The story of the life of the Buddha appears to have evolved over a few centuries, reaching its classic form in the epic poem Buddhacarita, composed about 100 CE. The story came to be stuffed with supernatural elements that many modern Buddhists prefer to disregard, although others still place great importance in them. At least some of the non-supernatural parts of the story are unlikely. For example, the Buddha is portrayed as the son of a king. But historians today say that his clan, the Shakya, didn’t appear to have had kings during his lifetime.

Last updated on: December 7, 2024 at 10:59 am, by Barbara O'Brien

In other words, there is no historical proof that Buddha ever existed. The same goes for Christianity; the three main tenets of Christian belief is "The Immaculate Conception", "The Resurrection", and "The Ascension". All meta-physical religious events, that have no historic proof, and are an essential requirement of FAITH.

We here at ToZ, know Zeus and our Gods exist as a daily living proof with our empowerment of the soul and direct spiritual relationship with Them on our journey to the Godhood.

Great question, let me think. Was Buddha’s enlightenment a historical event, I would say Yes, why wouldn’t it be? There’s is no document out his life outside Buddhist scriptures? Why would there need to be? Buddhism is literally the heart of Asia, everyone in the region is Buddhist. Saying there is no documentation of Buddah outside of Buddhist scriptures is like saying there are no humans is that part of the world. Who exactly would they verify Buddah to? Christians?

Here we are not overly concerned if Buddah really lived or not, we are concerned with what “his” teachings are doing to poor innocent people. If you have read the sermons on Buddhism, from Lady Maxine you will understand that Like Christianity the hero and villain are in each others body’s. But unlike Christian’s where a savior came and left. Buddhisms savior will only come when’s Buddha’s teachings which is actually bad stop “helping” the people the are influenced by Buddhism, the people imo are doing good, but not everyone is doing good. Factors like education and generational wealth come into play. I’m oriental I’ve visited Asia many times, this aren’t as bad as they use to be. But that is just because the west has realized the value of the people in that part of the world. No thanks to Buddhism.

Is the west herding Asians into Christianity? Or just looking to make a quick buck? I would say both, but it’s not like Buddhist (Asia) aren’t quick to sell the country to Xians form Power, due to Buddha’s “teachings”.

Yes. I was here before it was Toz. I will always be a Joser. I don’t quite understand what has been going on, but why can’t Buddah not be a god? He’s always worshipped like one. Much more than How Zeus or Horus is.

He is already considered not only a God but a refuge. How can we, The assembly of the Gods, Let our people seek refuge in antilife?


Hail Lucifer Morningstar!
Hail Baal!
Hail Hitler!
Hail Lady Astarte!
Hail the Powers of Orion!

 

[Ĥl·lĥæ]

Agreed, Buddah is not Zeus, but Zeus is Satan. I don’t know who the new priests are nowadays but a few years ago Satan was Satan now Baal is Satan. I was mistaken Zeus is Baal, Satan is still Satan(Enki) regardless Buddah was/is our Gods, just In Eastern cultures.

Baal was Posiden, now he is Zeus. Then Satan was Poseidon. It’s makes no difference is Buddah is Zeus or Poseidon. His teachings are of the Kikes, only his corpse is holy.

Belzevul is Satanas
The two are one: Zeus

But for some reason he separated "Satya-khonus".
It makes me happy to know that Satan is Saturn.

The Buddha does not consider himself to be a god or a deity.

Think of the ultimate nature of reality, which according to Vajrayana Buddhism is emptiness.
So the Buddha is emptiness itself, outside and beyond samsara.
The gods are in samsara.
The Buddha is not.
For example, there is one Buddha who represents the power of all the Buddhas together.
Another Buddha is the emanation of the compassion of all the Buddhas together.
Emptiness is one
The Buddha is not Sidata Gotama, the Buddha is Emptiness.