Silent Godess
New member
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2009
- Messages
- 9
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@..." <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@... wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@..." <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@... wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@... <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@... wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Allison P <apocalypseofjon@... wrote:
yeah, buddhism bites. I thought I wanted to be one for a while, but
when I actually started reading about its philosophies, I said fuck
that! All that 'life is suffering' bullshit, and you must abandon
your desires...nope. Most definitely not for me! Though, Daitson's
probably right; if you apply some of their teachings to power
meditation, you might get results, but as a guide to life...no. Hail
Father Satan!
On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@... <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.
#ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;font-family:Arial;padding:0 10px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp hr {border:1px solid #d8d8d8;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxhd {color:#628c2a;font-size:85%;font-weight:700;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxads {margin-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxad {padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mkp .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxad a {color:#0000ff;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-lc {font-family:Arial;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-lc #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxhd {font-weight:700;font-size:78%;line-height:122%;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-lc .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxad {margin-bottom:10px;padding:0 0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass a {color:#1e66ae;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactions {font-family:Verdana;font-size:11px;padding:10px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactivity {background-color:#e0ecee;float:left;font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;padding:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactivity span {font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactivity span a {color:#5085b6;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactivity span span {color:#ff7900;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxactivity span .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxunderline {text-decoration:underline;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach {clear:both;display:table;font-family:Arial;font-size:12px;padding:10px 0;width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach img {border:none;padding-right:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach label {display:block;margin-bottom:5px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach label a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass blockquote {} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxbold {font-family:Arial;font-size:13px;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxbold a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass dd.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxlast p a {font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass dd.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxlast p span {margin-right:10px;font-family:Verdana;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass dd.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxlast p span.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxyshortcuts {margin-right:0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach-table div div a {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxattach-table {width:400px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxfile-title a, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxfile-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxfile-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxfile-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphoto-title a, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphoto-title a:active, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphoto-title a:hover, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass div.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphoto-title a:visited {text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass ecxdiv#ygrps-yiv-853220878ygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-msg p a span.ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxyshortcuts {font-family:Verdana;font-size:10px;font-weight:normal;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxgreen {color:#628c2a;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxMsoNormal {} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass ecxo {font-size:0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphotos div {float:left;width:72px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphotos div div {border:1px solid #666666;height:62px;overflow:hidden;width:62px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxphotos div label {color:#666666;font-size:10px;overflow:hidden;text-align:center;white-space:nowrap;width:64px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxreco-category {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxreco-desc {font-size:77%;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass .ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxreplbq {} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg {font-size:13px;font-family:Arial, helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg table {font-size:inherit;font:100%;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg select, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass input, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass textarea {font:99% Arial, Helvetica, clean, sans-serif;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg pre, #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass code {font:115% monospace;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg ecx* {line-height:1.22em;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxlogo {padding-bottom:10px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-mlmsg a {color:#1E66AE;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-msg p a {font-family:Verdana;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-msg ecxp#ygrps-yiv-853220878attach-count span {color:#1E66AE;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-reco #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxreco-head {color:#ff7900;font-weight:700;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-reco {margin-bottom:20px;padding:0px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxov li a {font-size:130%;text-decoration:none;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxov li {font-size:77%;list-style-type:square;padding:6px 0;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-sponsor #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxov ul {padding:0 0 0 8px;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-text {font-family:Georgia;} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-text p {} #ygrps-yiv-853220878 .ygrps-yiv-853220878ExternalClass #ygrps-yiv-853220878ecxygrp-text tt {font-size:120%;}--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Allison P <apocalypseofjon@... wrote:
yeah, buddhism bites. I thought I wanted to be one for a while, but
when I actually started reading about its philosophies, I said fuck
that! All that 'life is suffering' bullshit, and you must abandon
your desires...nope. Most definitely not for me! Though, Daitson's
probably right; if you apply some of their teachings to power
meditation, you might get results, but as a guide to life...no. Hail
Father Satan!
On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@... <moonshadow48@... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.
<hr> Hotmail is redefining busy with tools for the New Busy. Get more from your inbox. See how.--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, Allison P <apocalypseofjon@ ... wrote:
yeah, buddhism bites. I thought I wanted to be one for a while, but
when I actually started reading about its philosophies, I said fuck
that! All that 'life is suffering' bullshit, and you must abandon
your desires...nope. Most definitely not for me! Though, Daitson's
probably right; if you apply some of their teachings to power
meditation, you might get results, but as a guide to life...no. Hail
Father Satan!
On 6/29/10, moonshadow48@ ... <moonshadow48@ ... wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from
"suffering"- -but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing.. .I flirted with it for a
few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@... wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had.ÃÂ Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside forceÃÂ at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÃÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÂÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@... wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÂÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
I hear the same crap from the xantia--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, Don Danko <mageson6666@ ... wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.
____________ _________ _________ __
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@ ...
To: JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.
--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
____________ _________ _________ __
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÂÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, "moonshadow48@ " <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"- -but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In JoS4adults@yahoogro ups.com, "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing.. .I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Hui Lin <shatterose09@... wrote:
how can u say he never existed? there are actual records of his birth and stuff. whether u believe in his teachings or not, cause xians did corrupt alot of it. and i was a buddhist before i converted, but i still practice it every other time. real buddhism doesnt suck and if u know the actual truth, then u would know. then again the real books are in chinese, im chinese, maybe it makes a difference. ive read some books that are in english and the translation are so wrong, i dont even pick an english book up anymore. so there!
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 7:56:11 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
So, this is how you see it.
Siddhartha Gautama: born a prince, hidden from the bad things of life, sees the bad things, vows to change them, becomes a beggar on the streets and lives an ascetic life, finds enlightenment after a few decades of meditation, and becomes a spiritual teacher, then dies of old age.
Sun god mythology: I am going to go with Horus here, because his story is commonly known to have been stolen by the christians to become the story of their savior, jesus.
Horus born of the virgin goddess Isis in a cave, became a child teacher, had 12 disciples, performed miracles, has many followers, and then is crucified and comes back from the dead.
The ONLY similarity i see in these two is that they were both, in their own way, teachers. I do not see how Siddhartha's tale was christianized, as his birth was before the widespread adoption of the christian religion, and was in a different part of the world (across the Asian continent)
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP and their false icons.
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÃÂ
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong, it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher nonetheless.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be had.ÃâàAlso Buddha never existed it's the first christ character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the 17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years. Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside forceÃâàat a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÃâÃÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@ wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be "free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@ wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with it for a few hours and it's horrible.
On 7/3/10, daitsun88 <daitsun88@... wrote:
Umm no, the original buddhist books are in Pali and Sanskrit, not in
Chinese, sorry. They were translated to chinese later on somewhere in the
13th century. How do you know that the chinese translations are not wrong
either?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tripi%E1%B9%ADaka
And yes, real buddhism sucks, but they try to make it more attractive by
saying it doesn't teach the absence of desire.
I hope you're not sympathizing with it or trying to soft soap it or you may
be in the same situation as "waltermassey1"...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Hui Lin <shatterose09@... wrote:
how can u say he never existed? there are actual records of his birth and
stuff. whether u believe in his teachings or not, cause xians did corrupt
alot of it. and i was a buddhist before i converted, but i still practice
it every other time. real buddhism doesnt suck and if u know the actual
truth, then u would know. then again the real books are in chinese, im
chinese, maybe it makes a difference. ive read some books that are in
english and the translation are so wrong, i dont even pick an english book
up anymore. so there!
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@...
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 7:56:11 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
Â
So, this is how you see it.
Siddhartha Gautama: born a prince, hidden from the bad things of life,
sees the bad things, vows to change them, becomes a beggar on the streets
and lives an ascetic life, finds enlightenment after a few decades of
meditation, and becomes a spiritual teacher, then dies of old age.
Sun god mythology: I am going to go with Horus here, because his story is
commonly known to have been stolen by the christians to become the story
of their savior, jesus.
Horus born of the virgin goddess Isis in a cave, became a child teacher,
had 12 disciples, performed miracles, has many followers, and then is
crucified and comes back from the dead.
The ONLY similarity i see in these two is that they were both, in their
own way, teachers. I do not see how Siddhartha's tale was christianized,
as his birth was before the widespread adoption of the christian religion,
and was in a different part of the world (across the Asian continent)
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
He never existed his tale is a repeat of the sun god mythology but in a
christianized form. It's time to move beyond the falsehoods of the RHP
and their false icons.
________________________________
From: waltermassey1 <walter_massey@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Fri, July 2, 2010 8:16:40 AM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÂÂ
Gautama Buddha (born Siddhārtha Gautama) was never considered to be
a "god" in the buddhist religion, but a man who had a good idea that
turned into a way of living. Even calling buddhism a religion is wrong,
it is, as i have said, a way of living one's life.
He was never considered the son of a god (although in one instance he
was thought to be a spirit answering a girl's prayers, but that was due
to his appearance), nor did he perform miracles. He was, at his most
basic, a teacher. Albeit a teacher with many students, but a teacher
nonetheless.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], Don Danko <mageson6666@ wrote:
To be honest Buddhism especially Mahayana branch is simply an enemy
religion. It was designed to phase in their paradigm by covering over
and corrupting the Aryan one left by the Gods. It was the first
xanity. It also despite it's claims and inspite of ruling a 3rd of the
earth once. Has brought no enlightenment. Only removed and corrupted
enough Satanic spiritual knowledge to ensure none was to be
had. Also Buddha never existed it's the first christ
character and a corruption of the Solar mytho's. About 2500 years ago
the enemy struck a major blow to humanity in the East and later the
West. The RHP is not more then that age, where Satanism is from the
dawn of Humanity.
The Tibet issue is interesting as the Dali Lama postion is not any
older then 600 years and did not have the power famed for till the
17th century. Buddism weakened Tibet internally so bad that a people
once strong warriors who defeated their enemies for hundreds of years.
Where toppled in a few days. Where the enemy can not take by direct
force they weaken within so they will fall either by outside
force at a later time or internal subversion over time.
The xanization of the East allowed for the islamics to sweep in far as
well.
________________________________
From: davidcommer <davidcommer@
To: [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url]
Sent: Tue, June 29, 2010 12:31:55 PM
Subject: [JoS4adults] Re: Budhism SUCKS
ÂÂÂ
I love the way you sum up the value of Spiritual Satanism -- the good
parts of both Buddhism and atheism. Not to mention the complete
rejection of any right-hand path religion.
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "daitsun88" <daitsun88@ wrote:
And that's the hypocrisy here, no desires, but they do have a desire
to "liberate" themselves from suffering...
"but if you have no desires, what good is living for, you may as
well be dead."
They've predicted and made an excuse for this part as well, they
think there are higher planes of existence and desires and ego is
what binds us to this "lower plane" here and causes us to be reborn
every time we die.
Its easy to see it is an imbalanced religion, because Buddhism is
spiritual reductionism in its pure form, the complete opposite of
total materialism. It tells us that the self is an illusion and any
physical things are impermanent and only something beyond physical
existance (it is pretty nonsensical here, because Buddhists don't
believe we have a permanent soul) is real. Just the opposite of
close-minded atheists who believe that only materiality exists.
I've looked into both and I like Spiritual Satanism because it is a
balanced religion, and has the good parts of both Buddhism and
atheism (and Laveyanism), pleasure and spiritual powers and the Gods
as our guides
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "moonshadow48@" <moonshadow48@
wrote:
Buddhism tells you not to have any desires, then you will be
"free" from "suffering"--but if you have no desires, what good is
living for, you may as well be dead. I tried it too a long time
ago and it does indeed suck...
--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Silent Godess" <silentgodess@
wrote:
Has anyone ever tried it...it is so depressing...I flirted with
it for a few hours and it's horrible.
"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan