Women in Nazism, what will it be like in the future?

[satanama666]

don't worry,satanic path and lunar dance 666,women are not birth machines and i'm sure many of us think the same
of course women's worth can be measured in career performance as well,in the same way ours is

You bought the feminist propaganda. Women and men are not the same, they are different. Men are oriented towards achievement and competition because the hormone testosterone they have makes it so. Women have different interests, and most of them want a children and family. Even if they claim to want a career, when they are about 30 years old most of them realize their mistake and suddenly want children, but it is too late. In western countries women are unhappier than men for this reason. Men do not "force" women to become mothers, it's what most women want by their nature.

It is very interesting that most who react to this seem to believe that motherhood is bad and career is better. Why don't you call women who work "work machines"? Family and career are different things and one is not better than the other. To call women "birth machines" is to demean their role as mothers, which is very important. Giving birth is something only women can do. To think that giving birth is bad means you hate the female nature and you prefer that women be more like men.

If you think what feminists are it makes sense that they would think that way. Most feminists are masculine women, and hate the fact that they are women. They try to be like men and force all other women to be like men. Since most women are not like men, when they listen to the feminists they become very unhappy with their life.

i think you didn't understand what i mean.
women are NOT obligated to have kids just because.they should only do so if they desire
also,women CAN contribute to society through work if they don't want a family.a good worker is better than a bad mother,just like the other way around,don't you think?
another thing you didn't take into consideration,buying into a false dilemma:LUST.some women,just like some men,might only want sex rather than either kids or work;i,myself,am such a man.
AGAIN,i didn't say i HATE motherhood,i did NOT call women MYSELF"birth machines",i did NOT say i hate feminity;it's just not every woman wants kids,the second was implied from other users such as jack,swg and henu the great,as for the last thing,ironically,i DO actually like feminine-looking women,especially because of their anatomical differences from my own(male)body.
i am open to debate,if you still want,though i will tell you my little joke:mind the GAP(the initials of my real,romanian name)

 

[Gengar]

Most average men are not more useful than most "average women" are. Most men currently are cuckolds, and rightfully, women have to step ahead to do fundamental things in society.

True weak mean have allowed all of this to happen. We have to heal the man first if there is any hope for us. Women hate weak good for nothing men which is why you have the rise of race mixing and literal cuckholds letting their wives fuck black guys or whatever.

The question is where the side of women that deals with motherhood, femininity, and other loftier aspects of life, does manifest. This currently is constrained by jews with the intention of limiting half of feminine power in society, while abusing the rest of it [productive power = shekel power for jews to abuse].

The reason why I disagree with women going into work en masse is because my mother was this working single mother and it messed me up a lot as child. She spent all day serving the the (((company))) and came home stressed out and impatient all the time. I don’t hate her for this. She always made sure I had what I needed, but this obviously isn’t the ideal scenario.

I think if a woman wants to work full time she shouldn’t have children. Let’s say you are a married couple and both of you work. No one can stay at home with the little ones during their most critical years so essentially they will be raised by strangers at daycare and public school which I am very opposed to.

The difference between this time and now is that the NS had a focus to increase and empower motherhood and to demographically save Germany. This naturally works out with the percent of women that want to have children, which is more than half at any given time. Even today, that is still the case.

Are we in the same if not worse position right now? We also have governments today that purposefully give no incentive for couples to have children and are very happy that they will be serving a corporate/government institution their entire lives.

So what should specifically be done about this. Give tax breaks and other incentives for married couples have children, or should pro-motherhood propaganda be spread? Either way we definitely need an NS group for women in the future because if not they will likely derive their values and ideas from the Jewish media and universities tell them, this is especially true for my generation.

while I personally agree that in an ideal society women would be traditional stay at home mothers , we are not close to that. Men are damaged as well with many simply being cuckolds and also the jews have made it very difficult for one salary to have a solid living in a neighborhood that hasn't been "enriched".

if I had a daughter I would absolutely encourage her to be independent in this world rather than latch on to some random guy post high school(who is in all likelihood not going to be SS lol), and be entirely dependent on him. its easier than ever for a woman to climb the ladder and be successful with all the simps out there. ideally women would pair up and have children first while young THEN later on go to school or work if they decide to, but thats just not great advice in a practical sense for todays circumstances. just my opinion.

 

[Henu the Great]

the second was implied from other users such as jack,swg and henu the great,

I was actually saying the same if you read carefully, but it seems I was misunderstood. As Lunar Dance 666 replied basically saying "you can't know the future". It's pretty obvious what's going to happen with family values when the jew is taken out of the picture... Traditional family will be honored and incentives are made so people will reproduce more. On some Eastern EU countires it has already been done. I think it was Hungary, I don't remember excactly. On the other hand, if one chooses career over family, so be it. It's not so very complicated, just common sense.

 

[Jack]

don't worry,satanic path and lunar dance 666,women are not birth machines and i'm sure many of us think the same
of course women's worth can be measured in career performance as well,in the same way ours is

You bought the feminist propaganda. Women and men are not the same, they are different. Men are oriented towards achievement and competition because the hormone testosterone they have makes it so. Women have different interests, and most of them want a children and family. Even if they claim to want a career, when they are about 30 years old most of them realize their mistake and suddenly want children, but it is too late. In western countries women are unhappier than men for this reason. Men do not "force" women to become mothers, it's what most women want by their nature.

It is very interesting that most who react to this seem to believe that motherhood is bad and career is better. Why don't you call women who work "work machines"? Family and career are different things and one is not better than the other. To call women "birth machines" is to demean their role as mothers, which is very important. Giving birth is something only women can do. To think that giving birth is bad means you hate the female nature and you prefer that women be more like men.

If you think what feminists are it makes sense that they would think that way. Most feminists are masculine women, and hate the fact that they are women. They try to be like men and force all other women to be like men. Since most women are not like men, when they listen to the feminists they become very unhappy with their life.

i think you didn't understand what i mean.
women are NOT obligated to have kids just because.they should only do so if they desire
also,women CAN contribute to society through work if they don't want a family.a good worker is better than a bad mother,just like the other way around,don't you think?
another thing you didn't take into consideration,buying into a false dilemma:LUST.some women,just like some men,might only want sex rather than either kids or work;i,myself,am such a man.
AGAIN,i didn't say i HATE motherhood,i did NOT call women MYSELF"birth machines",i did NOT say i hate feminity;it's just not every woman wants kids,the second was implied from other users such as jack,swg and henu the great,as for the last thing,ironically,i DO actually like feminine-looking women,especially because of their anatomical differences from my own(male)body.
i am open to debate,if you still want,though i will tell you my little joke:mind the GAP(the initials of my real,romanian name)

We are talking about a 80 - 20 scenario.

Meaning if we raise a generation of people with pro family propaganda and culture, 80 percent of women would choose to be mothers and 20 percent (or less) would choose to pursue a career (and then have children). An extremely low amount of women (0.000something percentage) of women would not want to have children.

What we currently have is a reverse 98 - 2 scenario with the 98 percent of women refusing to be mothers first and pursuing their career and a huge percentage totally opting out of relationships. And then when they get married they produce at best 1 child. Its totally dystopian situation and this generation (and generations until the Nationalists take control) are totally lost.

And the major problem is that most people are obese and the mothers have children later in life (after 30) which has a statistically significant probability for causing a host of neurological disorders and other problems in the child. This is a major issue along with vaccines.

This generation (and every generation since the sexual revolution) is a death cult when people have been fundamentally brainwashed since birth into an anti family ideology through the culture and a large part of this is economic necessity.

The fundamental structure of reality is superceded by a social ideology which has dominated the minds of people till date.

The reason why all these problems are happening is because the Jews have placated the testosterone of men which has dropped so drastically that it is making the human species more androgynous. This is done through xenestrogrens and chemicals and micro plastics in everyday resources like processed food, soap, and almost all readymade products. Without masculine men there is no one to resist the Jews and the jews are able to construct and forward their dystopian reality.

Documents from before the sexual revolution written by psychologists reveal that they plotted to end the masculinity of men through hormonal disruption because they believed masculinity was the greatest impediment to a Utopian Marxist State and studies suggest that weak and frail men with shorter frames support Socialism and liberalism.

The levels of male depression, drug use and suicide is at record highs because their basic purpose of caring for a woman and a family has been stolen by the State and now a generation of low testosterone males with suicidal confused ideologies are in limbo without any purpose.

Here's what happened -

• The Jews created Feminism because according to the Cultural Marxist ideology they wanted to break the family unit apart to form a utopia under the state (they wanted to be gods over a bunch of peasants. )

• The Jewish feminist wins were wiped out when Nationalists took over their countries in Germany and Italy and curbed the Feminist revolution totally.

• The jews started a war which they thought would bring about a one world communist government but the Nationalists stopped Communism. The Jews abandoned Stalinist Communism after it collapsed and wasn't economically successful.

• The jews discovered that they could not win a war of arms because men would stop it. The jews then employed the CIA and other Psychologists and Psychiatrists to discover another way to bring about a one world government.

• The Psychologists claimed that masculinity and the family structure was a major impediment to the marxist plan and that men need to be feminized so that they don't resist centralization

.

• The jews devised a way to shape culture through media ,academia and other visual - audio methods to introduce liberalism into the minds of the children since young to inculcate them into a socially engineered reality.

• The jews increasingly gave women jobs to break apart the family unit and to drive down wages for the middle class ,accompanied with immigration reform and shipping off jobs to china.

• The Jewish culture of liberalism and anti-childern continued to tank the birthrate in western countries while the birthrate in socially conservative countries like China and India and Africa and the middle east increased.

• The Jews using a host of psychological manipulation tactics,economic warfare and hormonal control had succeeded in eliminating masculinity and strong family and a healthy birth rate in developed countries.

• The Jewish society left men without purpose and confused, depressed and suicidal. They tried to mask it with Promiscuity, porn, video games and entertainment media.

• The Jewish society left women even more unhappier than men and they continued to believe that what they believe came about naturally and not because of a Jewish psyop. The Unhappiness reached tipping point when record numbers of young people opted out of relationships and sex.

• The jews introduced transgenderism in an attempt to behead the corpse of society that was already dead.

• After reaching Critical mass but being massively exposed on the way and a major portion of humanity Redpilled about the jews, the jews launched the Coronavirus takeover when they suspected Donald Trump was going to achieve what the Nationalists in the 1930s had achieved.

• We are currently living in a post civilizational era with a brutal war of attrition beginning with vaccination ,mass inoculations, lockdowns, death camps (hospitals) ,AI surveillance, microchips, 5G radiation etc.

• We hope our years of tribulation end quickly with humanity rising up against the jews en masse and having a Nuremberg tribunal type trial against the heads of these Globalists.

• We'll need to reimagine society after that and create a new civilization. We are currently in the transition phase between Kali Yuga and the next Yuga. The current age is unsalvageable and over. Everything we think about reality and male - female relationships will be reimagined by the next generation(s) and they will recognize our mistake and hopefully correct it.

This graph says it all. The birthrate tanked after the sexual revolution. Women had all the rights that they had before it (except the right to vote).

After the jews liberalised the western nations, it all went down. And it will continue to go down until we fundamentally change the basics of societal reality that we take for granted now.

 

[Edward Lonsa]

The reason why I disagree with women going into work en masse is because my mother was this working single mother and it messed me up a lot as child. She spent all day serving the the (((company))) and came home stressed out and impatient all the time. I don’t hate her for this. She always made sure I had what I needed, but this obviously isn’t the ideal scenario.

Now imagine, your mother, Aryan, genial and greatest in her own way in the world becomes a Satan's Demoness, great alchemist, mathematican, artist or whatever, and work for the Purpose not for the (((company))). All day, many days straight, then returns happy and fulfilled to you with smile on her face sharing with you her higher knowledge she achieved. Full of dignity, no one's slave. Totally free in all ways - sexual, intellectual, professional, free to have as many children as she wants from any man she herself chooses, - totally independant, extremelly rich. You look up to her like to a star and think... some day you will be like her out there far in the sky. Among her Godly coleages also working for a Purpose.

I do not believe in such thing as mediocrity in Satanism. I was born a son of independant genial self-reliant, sexually and in all other ways free mother living in women-hating non-Western country (I mean religion not people, people are innocent) whose feminity and tender went deeper than that of any woman of any epoc I ever knew about. Her Example will forever be there for me and I will teach any daughter figure of mine and lead them to the highest of heights. I believe in humanity's greatness. I belive in the ideal. I want world consisting of Teslas and Kovalevskayas, not less.

I admit the greatest pleasure for father is to see his kid on the highest height - much more than to be there himself. I envy Peter - he saw his Katherine to be the greatest of Imperiors of Russia.

 

[NishaWillow]

If there are women who want to be mothers, wonderful. If there are women who are not ready to have children and want to help society, also wonderful. Also a mother can work in a field she likes.
We can't just stay at the mother stage forever. In the sense that our children will grow up. And then we can take care of other things. We can get involved in society, in a healthy way for ourselves, in the sense that we do not have to work 10 hours a day, under pressure and under enormous stress.

 

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

very difficult for one salary to have a solid living in a neighborhood that hasn't been "enriched".

If there were less women in the work force than wages would rise. This basic economics supply/demand.

Also living in a suburb/city should not be a goal. Go to a rural area where the cost of living is very cheap and get yourself some land that you can put a garden on, as well as a fresh water source. When the grid goes down it will not be nice in an urban area.

You can also do whatever TF you want on your own land, own farm animals, shoot guns, build whatever you want on it with no government regulation, as well as privacy.

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

very difficult for one salary to have a solid living in a neighborhood that hasn't been "enriched".

If there were less women in the work force than wages would rise. This basic economics supply/demand.

Also living in a suburb/city should not be a goal. Go to a rural area where the cost of living is very cheap and get yourself some land that you can put a garden on, as well as a fresh water source. When the grid goes down it will not be nice in an urban area.

You can also do whatever TF you want on your own land, own farm animals, shoot guns, build whatever you want on it with no government regulation, as well as privacy.

This is idolization.
If you own your own farm, you have to do chores every day. In case of a garden, weed weeds, sow seeds, water plants, chop wood, turn the soil, make compost etc.
If you have animals, you have to feed them every day at least twice a day, clean their pens etc. And you still would not have any money to buy tools with that you need.

I hope you realize what you are saying. You may think of it as the good life but it us a rough life.
See Homestead Rescue in example. Though they may be a bit over the top youll see the kind of issues youll have to deal with.

 

[SouthernWhiteGentile]

This is idolization.
If you own your own farm, you have to do chores every day. In case of a garden, weed weeds, sow seeds, water plants, chop wood, turn the soil, make compost etc.
If you have animals, you have to feed them every day at least twice a day, clean their pens etc. And you still would not have any money to buy tools with that you need.

I hope you realize what you are saying. You may think of it as the good life but it us a rough life.
See Homestead Rescue in example. Though they may be a bit over the top youll see the kind of issues youll have to deal with.

It doesn’t have to be a full on homestead. Having a decent sized garden is very manageable especially if it’s something easy like potatoes. Same for animals. You don’t have to have a giant herd. Just enough so that you can get eggs/milk/meat from if necessary.

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

don't worry,satanic path and lunar dance 666,women are not birth machines and i'm sure many of us think the same
of course women's worth can be measured in career performance as well,in the same way ours is

You bought the feminist propaganda. Women and men are not the same, they are different. Men are oriented towards achievement and competition because the hormone testosterone they have makes it so. Women have different interests, and most of them want a children and family. Even if they claim to want a career, when they are about 30 years old most of them realize their mistake and suddenly want children, but it is too late. In western countries women are unhappier than men for this reason. Men do not "force" women to become mothers, it's what most women want by their nature.

It is very interesting that most who react to this seem to believe that motherhood is bad and career is better. Why don't you call women who work "work machines"? Family and career are different things and one is not better than the other. To call women "birth machines" is to demean their role as mothers, which is very important. Giving birth is something only women can do. To think that giving birth is bad means you hate the female nature and you prefer that women be more like men.

If you think what feminists are it makes sense that they would think that way. Most feminists are masculine women, and hate the fact that they are women. They try to be like men and force all other women to be like men. Since most women are not like men, when they listen to the feminists they become very unhappy with their life.

i think you didn't understand what i mean.
women are NOT obligated to have kids just because.they should only do so if they desire
also,women CAN contribute to society through work if they don't want a family.a good worker is better than a bad mother,just like the other way around,don't you think?
another thing you didn't take into consideration,buying into a false dilemma:LUST.some women,just like some men,might only want sex rather than either kids or work;i,myself,am such a man.
AGAIN,i didn't say i HATE motherhood,i did NOT call women MYSELF"birth machines",i did NOT say i hate feminity;it's just not every woman wants kids,the second was implied from other users such as jack,swg and henu the great,as for the last thing,ironically,i DO actually like feminine-looking women,especially because of their anatomical differences from my own(male)body.
i am open to debate,if you still want,though i will tell you my little joke:mind the GAP(the initials of my real,romanian name)

Thank you for your reply Satanama666

@both
You know, there are some people say things either because they are set in a way and have tunnelvision, think they have the 'absolute truth' whilst it is a mere opinion, and there are others that just have prejudices.
Neither of those validate a standpoint. And you shouldn't limit yourself because someone says something about you and judges you on it while they do not even know you.

What does this say about a person? The one who judges in these ways is narrow-minded, probably generally not someone pleasant to be about with or to converse with or to even have as a friend.

Those with positive views on the world, and those who encourage us, are the best people we can engage with. This excludes potards and whatnot though. Harming yourself is the worst you can do.

What I am saying is, do not let yourself get down by such lowlives, but build your own path.
Make your own happiness, and enjoy all that you can be.
Let those with the small brains shout, they're too dumb anyway.

~Lunar Dance 666

 

[Henu the Great]

Thank you for your reply Satanama666

@both
You know, there are some people say things either because they are set in a way and have tunnelvision, think they have the 'absolute truth' whilst it is a mere opinion, and there are others that just have prejudices.
Neither of those validate a standpoint. And you shouldn't limit yourself because someone says something about you and judges you on it while they do not even know you.

What does this say about a person? The one who judges in these ways is narrow-minded, probably generally not someone pleasant to be about with or to converse with or to even have as a friend.

Those with positive views on the world, and those who encourage us, are the best people we can engage with. This excludes potards and whatnot though. Harming yourself is the worst you can do.

What I am saying is, do not let yourself get down by such lowlives, but build your own path.
Make your own happiness, and enjoy all that you can be.
Let those with the small brains shout, they're too dumb anyway.

~Lunar Dance 666

Did you refer to me as a lowlife dummie?

I can not mince words like these guys, but please, I'm not even disagreeing with you here...

 

[Lunar Dance 666]

Thank you for your reply Satanama666

@both
You know, there are some people say things either because they are set in a way and have tunnelvision, think they have the 'absolute truth' whilst it is a mere opinion, and there are others that just have prejudices.
Neither of those validate a standpoint. And you shouldn't limit yourself because someone says something about you and judges you on it while they do not even know you.

What does this say about a person? The one who judges in these ways is narrow-minded, probably generally not someone pleasant to be about with or to converse with or to even have as a friend.

Those with positive views on the world, and those who encourage us, are the best people we can engage with. This excludes potards and whatnot though. Harming yourself is the worst you can do.

What I am saying is, do not let yourself get down by such lowlives, but build your own path.
Make your own happiness, and enjoy all that you can be.
Let those with the small brains shout, they're too dumb anyway.

~Lunar Dance 666

Did you refer to me as a lowlife dummie?

I can not mince words like these guys, but please, I'm not even disagreeing with you here...

Henu, I did not quote you here, and from what I remember from the topic thus far, you are not picking sides.

If I were to name an example to what I said before, in line with this topic, there would be this:
In some islamic countries women are not allowed to drive a car nor able to leave the house by themselves.
Even the 'you are not allowed to drive a car because you are a woman' has played out in europe, last century.
Think about the reasons for this yourself before continueing reading.


I think that because women got a little more right, some mens felt threatened by this and decided to suppress women. Now this to me seems absolutely ridiculous and narrow-minded.
Because would you as a person, regardless of gender, agree or sit still with someone telling you you cant do something just because they say so.
Agreeing would only please them. It would not free you, but bind you in shackles.

A more modern variant could be, you want to become a singer or a dancer or a painter. Your parents may judge you because they want you to earn enough money that you do not have to live on the street half of the time.
Or they put your down because they think of you as a failure, treat you like a black sheep. Say nasty things about your first drawings when youve only just started.
But even the sucessful businessman or the famous singer or professional painter may face prejudice, born out of jealousy.
Some people understand this, stand above it and grow together to skeep trying to build something beautiful, regardless of slander.

I do have to add here that I think most of the slander would come from the J people, and some would come from gentiles as well, even to sucessful people. And they would also all tell you to look at the things that matter most to you and are dear to you. Like the applause you get for something wonderful and not to the hateful sights of the scum that just somehow seem to find pleasure in ruining someone elses day.

I hope you understand better what I meant now Henu.

 

[Edward Lonsa]

very difficult for one salary to have a solid living in a neighborhood that hasn't been "enriched".

If there were less women in the work force than wages would rise. This basic economics supply/demand.

1. "Enrichment" is a problem of local men's lack of war spirit, patriotism and organisation, not of salaries. If poor males were Men, no mud would dare to even look in their country's way.

2. This is mathematically incorrect. Working places do not increase or collapse because different worker came. Womem get employed instead of some underperformant men, not together with them.

Basically this idea of "priviledged sex" lies in the very base of feminist agenda: they also have their special "priviledged sex" to be taken in an area despite of the skill. Just for sexual organs, despite of how under-performant they are. Just in your post "priviledged under-performer" is different. As well as this idea that "parenthood should be just granted / forced" onto somebody just because they are a woman. This makes parenthood and motherhood something very cheap. As if it should not be earned as everything else does.

Civilization is based on the exelence, not on granted priviledge. Just look at islamic countries: they have sexual priviledge and they all belong to the third world with 2-3 second world exceptions which are less orthodox such as Iran. While look at South Korea and Japan: they are based on skill and exelence, not on any religious, sexual or any other granted priviledge. And while they are not even Aryan they have higher technology than most Aryan countries.

In communist block we have such thing as familian priviledge. It means despite of what sex, profession or who you are, if you are not criminal authority's son or daughter, you will get nowhere. Guess where it leads: all downs, fools and under-performers of both sexes get in top just because of priviledged background. Result: second world countries with highest corruption, criminality and death rate.

I think we should leave aside all this "granted" communist ideology such as granting jobs for a penis or granting parenthood for a vagina. All should be earned by a skill.

 

[idiocy smasher]

very difficult for one salary to have a solid living in a neighborhood that hasn't been "enriched".

If there were less women in the work force than wages would rise. This basic economics supply/demand.

1. "Enrichment" is a problem of local men's lack of war spirit, patriotism and organisation, not of salaries. If poor males were Men, no mud would dare to even look in their country's way.

2. This is mathematically incorrect. Working places do not increase or collapse because different worker came. Womem get employed instead of some underperformant men, not together with them.

Basically this idea of "priviledged sex" lies in the very base of feminist agenda: they also have their special "priviledged sex" to be taken in an area despite of the skill. Just for sexual organs, despite of how under-performant they are. Just in your post "priviledged under-performer" is different. As well as this idea that "parenthood should be just granted / forced" onto somebody just because they are a woman. This makes parenthood and motherhood something very cheap. As if it should not be earned as everything else does.

Civilization is based on the exelence, not on granted priviledge. Just look at islamic countries: they have sexual priviledge and they all belong to the third world with 2-3 second world exceptions which are less orthodox such as Iran. While look at South Korea and Japan: they are based on skill and exelence, not on any religious, sexual or any other granted priviledge. And while they are not even Aryan they have higher technology than most Aryan countries.

In communist block we have such thing as familian priviledge. It means despite of what sex, profession or who you are, if you are not criminal authority's son or daughter, you will get nowhere. Guess where it leads: all downs, fools and under-performers of both sexes get in top just because of priviledged background. Result: second world countries with highest corruption, criminality and death rate.

I think we should leave aside all this "granted" communist ideology such as granting jobs for a penis or granting parenthood for a vagina. All should be earned by a skill.

Edward I am not here to slam your points regarding gender quotas vs meritocracy
I'm here to criticize your approach towards caucasians whom you called for no apparent reason non whites
Because when you check anthropologists works you'll see caucasians are considered white
And why did you call Lukashenko's interior minister non white
R u attempting to be like varg or what
If yes then I am considering you a moron till the day you die

 

[Aquarius]

If there were less women in the work force than wages would rise. This basic economics supply/demand.

1. "Enrichment" is a problem of local men's lack of war spirit, patriotism and organisation, not of salaries. If poor males were Men, no mud would dare to even look in their country's way.

2. This is mathematically incorrect. Working places do not increase or collapse because different worker came. Womem get employed instead of some underperformant men, not together with them.

Basically this idea of "priviledged sex" lies in the very base of feminist agenda: they also have their special "priviledged sex" to be taken in an area despite of the skill. Just for sexual organs, despite of how under-performant they are. Just in your post "priviledged under-performer" is different. As well as this idea that "parenthood should be just granted / forced" onto somebody just because they are a woman. This makes parenthood and motherhood something very cheap. As if it should not be earned as everything else does.

Civilization is based on the exelence, not on granted priviledge. Just look at islamic countries: they have sexual priviledge and they all belong to the third world with 2-3 second world exceptions which are less orthodox such as Iran. While look at South Korea and Japan: they are based on skill and exelence, not on any religious, sexual or any other granted priviledge. And while they are not even Aryan they have higher technology than most Aryan countries.

In communist block we have such thing as familian priviledge. It means despite of what sex, profession or who you are, if you are not criminal authority's son or daughter, you will get nowhere. Guess where it leads: all downs, fools and under-performers of both sexes get in top just because of priviledged background. Result: second world countries with highest corruption, criminality and death rate.

I think we should leave aside all this "granted" communist ideology such as granting jobs for a penis or granting parenthood for a vagina. All should be earned by a skill.

Edward I am not here to slam your points regarding gender quotas vs meritocracy
I'm here to criticize your approach towards caucasians whom you called for no apparent reason non whites
Because when you check anthropologists works you'll see caucasians are considered white
And why did you call Lukashenko's interior minister non white
R u attempting to be like varg or what
If yes then I am considering you a moron till the day you die

Where did he ever say caucasians are not white? As for Lukashenka he might as well be a jew communist scum. You look like a troll honestly.

 

[idiocy smasher]

1. "Enrichment" is a problem of local men's lack of war spirit, patriotism and organisation, not of salaries. If poor males were Men, no mud would dare to even look in their country's way.

2. This is mathematically incorrect. Working places do not increase or collapse because different worker came. Womem get employed instead of some underperformant men, not together with them.

Basically this idea of "priviledged sex" lies in the very base of feminist agenda: they also have their special "priviledged sex" to be taken in an area despite of the skill. Just for sexual organs, despite of how under-performant they are. Just in your post "priviledged under-performer" is different. As well as this idea that "parenthood should be just granted / forced" onto somebody just because they are a woman. This makes parenthood and motherhood something very cheap. As if it should not be earned as everything else does.

Civilization is based on the exelence, not on granted priviledge. Just look at islamic countries: they have sexual priviledge and they all belong to the third world with 2-3 second world exceptions which are less orthodox such as Iran. While look at South Korea and Japan: they are based on skill and exelence, not on any religious, sexual or any other granted priviledge. And while they are not even Aryan they have higher technology than most Aryan countries.

In communist block we have such thing as familian priviledge. It means despite of what sex, profession or who you are, if you are not criminal authority's son or daughter, you will get nowhere. Guess where it leads: all downs, fools and under-performers of both sexes get in top just because of priviledged background. Result: second world countries with highest corruption, criminality and death rate.

I think we should leave aside all this "granted" communist ideology such as granting jobs for a penis or granting parenthood for a vagina. All should be earned by a skill.

Edward I am not here to slam your points regarding gender quotas vs meritocracy
I'm here to criticize your approach towards caucasians whom you called for no apparent reason non whites
Because when you check anthropologists works you'll see caucasians are considered white
And why did you call Lukashenko's interior minister non white
R u attempting to be like varg or what
If yes then I am considering you a moron till the day you die

Where did he ever say caucasians are not white? As for Lukashenka he might as well be a jew communist scum. You look like a troll honestly.

He called people from the Caucasus non white despite being Abkhazian himself ffs
I'll copy his bs claims

 

[Osiris Silvio]

Then, if I were a woman, it would be pretty sad to be valued only for the number of pregnancies you had.

Would you rather be valued by the amount of shekels you generate for your Jew boss at a corporate job? Or how about dancing on a pole? Or maybe starring in a (((Pornographic film))). Do you really believe these things are more honorable than contributing to the continuation of your people? My Gods that is the greatest thing on earth that you can possibly do!

But you are a homo that still has these Marxist-feminist ideas in your head so I don’t expect you to understand that.

I would say no more than 1/3 of women should be in the work force, and these should be jobs at a school, or a hospital, something caring that women are good at, not sitting at a computer in an office, my mother does this so I know what I am talking about

Can you open your narrow brain a bit? If a woman gas dreams outside motherhood, what is Marxist about this. Ouh, your mother works at a computer so you know what you're talking about. Lol

 

[Jack]

Then, if I were a woman, it would be pretty sad to be valued only for the number of pregnancies you had.

Would you rather be valued by the amount of shekels you generate for your Jew boss at a corporate job? Or how about dancing on a pole? Or maybe starring in a (((Pornographic film))). Do you really believe these things are more honorable than contributing to the continuation of your people? My Gods that is the greatest thing on earth that you can possibly do!

But you are a homo that still has these Marxist-feminist ideas in your head so I don’t expect you to understand that.

I would say no more than 1/3 of women should be in the work force, and these should be jobs at a school, or a hospital, something caring that women are good at, not sitting at a computer in an office, my mother does this so I know what I am talking about

Can you open your narrow brain a bit? If a woman gas dreams outside motherhood, what is Marxist about this. Ouh, your mother works at a computer so you know what you're talking about. Lol

Probably too late to have this discussion, because the jews are saying that neither men nor women are going to have a job and everyone will live in small pods without a job having UBI and robots will do all the work. And also they want to make everything infertile so you'll have to pay the jews money for them to give you gene therapy to have kids. And you'll never accumulate that kind of money in the coming society.


If this is sounding nightmarish and you want to stop all this, let's do the RTR.

 

[Osiris Silvio]

Would you rather be valued by the amount of shekels you generate for your Jew boss at a corporate job? Or how about dancing on a pole? Or maybe starring in a (((Pornographic film))). Do you really believe these things are more honorable than contributing to the continuation of your people? My Gods that is the greatest thing on earth that you can possibly do!

But you are a homo that still has these Marxist-feminist ideas in your head so I don’t expect you to understand that.

I would say no more than 1/3 of women should be in the work force, and these should be jobs at a school, or a hospital, something caring that women are good at, not sitting at a computer in an office, my mother does this so I know what I am talking about

Can you open your narrow brain a bit? If a woman gas dreams outside motherhood, what is Marxist about this. Ouh, your mother works at a computer so you know what you're talking about. Lol

Probably too late to have this discussion, because the jews are saying that neither men nor women are going to have a job and everyone will live in small pods without a job having UBI and robots will do all the work. And also they want to make everything infertile so you'll have to pay the jews money for them to give you gene therapy to have kids. And you'll never accumulate that kind of money in the coming society.


If this is sounding nightmarish and you want to stop all this, let's do the RTR.

Certainly let's do it!