Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

wouldn't chiron be more important than Pluto?

Joined
Jun 15, 2005
Messages
6
more maybe of equal value...

if what they sayy about chiron is true:
it is about 1/2 - 1/3 the size of pluto
and it orbits between saturn and uranus

chiron is closer than pluto meaning that it would be stronger than pluto
 
This is not about the proximity but about placement.

If a asteroid like 1 Ceres (astronomically a dwarf planet), 2 Pallas, 3 Juno, 4 Vesta, other asteroids, depending on who wants to incorporate which in his or her chart - http://darkstarastrology.com/asteroids/ ) or a centaur - 2060 Chiron being their leader, with the remaining ones (Nessus, Pholus, Asbolus, Chariklo) is placed in an angular house (1st, 4th, 7th and 10th), or is conjunct the axes (AC/DC, MC/IC, the Lunar Nodes) or being heavily aspected to personal planets, including Luminaries, it can have a more significant meaning. However, it is dubious that they will TOTALLY overshadow the major planets.

The matter of size did trouble astrologers for some time, thus some of them re-considered the planetary influences and significance, hence why the 4 Ladies became used in contemporary astrology.

Siguard Draconis.

Satanas Via, Vera et Vita est.
Ave Satanas! Rege Satanas!

--- In [url=mailto:[email protected]][email protected][/url], "Sagittarius Overdose" wrote:

more maybe of equal value...

if what they sayy about chiron is true:
it is about 1/2 - 1/3 the size of pluto
and it orbits between saturn and uranus

chiron is closer than pluto meaning that it would be stronger than pluto
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top