SS drug

[Akitu]

Goodmorning,


I had many questions , about the SS and communism.

SS drug history , the tale of SS taking drugs to be invincible , I truely believe it is another big lie , is it not?

About communism, I had a discussion with some friends of mine where they told me proletarian dictatorship is good , and class warfare too, because Workers in communism substitute politicians and rebels against them to take power by eliminating bourgeoisie they would end the differences of salary and garantee equality. They told me precisely "workers would use to govern for the workers taking a few money and never dispose of the people like rich politicians do". I don't believe that is right, I think people can collaborate , rich , poor, without the need of warfare and classwar , without the need of removing anyone.

 

[616Taysha]

Are those 'friends' of yours humans? Or some shekelsteinbergs? Because shit will always defend their tribal program, presenting it as something beneficial to blind, stupid goyim.

Here: https://www.deathofcommunism.com/en/

https://ancient-forums.com/threads/should-communism-be-abolished.299868/#post-1135176 - considering this thread, are you trying to argue that communism HAS some merit? And that Nazism is somehow EEEEEVIL?

 

[OttoHart]

As we didn't have as much knowledge about which substances were dangerous (opioids for example required an Eastern crisis to truly be discovered to be addictive, and cocaine was considered healthy medicine for decades), I wouldn't completely rule out that some people in the SS Army were using various substances either in battle or for recovery.
I'm sure the higher standing members were not this ignorant, though. The myths about Hitler or Goebbels doing meth, or whatever, are obviously fake.

"Proletariat dictatorship" sounds good in theory, but it can never happen on a large scale nation, this kind of responsibility assigning barely works in small groups.
"The workers" can't lead, which is why we made representative leadership a thing. "This person represents all farmers, this person represents roadmaking, tourism etc." is literally how our ccurrent republic systems work. They need some minor improvements and less corruption, but the system is fine.

Class war and class consciousness is sort of based in reality, as there are "elites" that consider most people to be cattle for work and nothing else, as they sit on a throne of privileges. This is different from generational wealth giving newborns in rich families various privileges, which is fine and normal.
Communism, however, refuses to acknowledge that these elite families are mostly Jewish or acolytes of jews. Why? Because it is an exploitative ideology, usually led by jews to begin with.

 

[Akitu]

Are those 'friends' of yours humans? Or some shekelsteinbergs? Because shit will always defend their tribal program, presenting it as something beneficial to blind, stupid goyim.

Here: https://www.deathofcommunism.com/en/

https://ancient-forums.com/threads/should-communism-be-abolished.299868/#post-1135176 - considering this thread, are you trying to argue that communism HAS some merit? And that Nazism is somehow EEEEEVIL?

Absolutely I'm not arguing about this, it doesn't have merits. I agree with you

 

[Akitu]

Are those 'friends' of yours humans? Or some shekelsteinbergs? Because shit will always defend their tribal program, presenting it as something beneficial to blind, stupid goyim.

Here: https://www.deathofcommunism.com/en/

https://ancient-forums.com/threads/should-communism-be-abolished.299868/#post-1135176 - considering this thread, are you trying to argue that communism HAS some merit? And that Nazism is somehow EEEEEVIL?

I will tell you more,

One of them told me "there used to be some friends of my grandparents who claimed to starve in nazi germany. I told them disoccupation was slowly reduced, not all at once

 

[Akitu]

As we didn't have as much knowledge about which substances were dangerous (opioids for example required an Eastern crisis to truly be discovered to be addictive, and cocaine was considered healthy medicine for decades), I wouldn't completely rule out that some people in the SS Army were using various substances either in battle or for recovery.
I'm sure the higher standing members were not this ignorant, though. The myths about Hitler or Goebbels doing meth, or whatever, are obviously fake.

"Proletariat dictatorship" sounds good in theory, but it can never happen on a large scale nation, this kind of responsibility assigning barely works in small groups.
"The workers" can't lead, which is why we made representative leadership a thing. "This person represents all farmers, this person represents roadmaking, tourism etc." is literally how our ccurrent republic systems work. They need some minor improvements and less corruption, but the system is fine.

Class war and class consciousness is sort of based in reality, as there are "elites" that consider most people to be cattle for work and nothing else, as they sit on a throne of privileges. This is different from generational wealth giving newborns in rich families various privileges, which is fine and normal.
Communism, however, refuses to acknowledge that these elite families are mostly Jewish or acolytes of jews. Why? Because it is an exploitative ideology, usually led by jews to begin with.

In fact, thinking about it, how would The workers lead? If they have to work? How is it possible to do both of them? I agree more on having popular tribunal that CONTROLS politicians, nominated by people , like vikings and nazi germany

 

[Akitu]

As we didn't have as much knowledge about which substances were dangerous (opioids for example required an Eastern crisis to truly be discovered to be addictive, and cocaine was considered healthy medicine for decades), I wouldn't completely rule out that some people in the SS Army were using various substances either in battle or for recovery.
I'm sure the higher standing members were not this ignorant, though. The myths about Hitler or Goebbels doing meth, or whatever, are obviously fake.

"Proletariat dictatorship" sounds good in theory, but it can never happen on a large scale nation, this kind of responsibility assigning barely works in small groups.
"The workers" can't lead, which is why we made representative leadership a thing. "This person represents all farmers, this person represents roadmaking, tourism etc." is literally how our ccurrent republic systems work. They need some minor improvements and less corruption, but the system is fine.

Class war and class consciousness is sort of based in reality, as there are "elites" that consider most people to be cattle for work and nothing else, as they sit on a throne of privileges. This is different from generational wealth giving newborns in rich families various privileges, which is fine and normal.
Communism, however, refuses to acknowledge that these elite families are mostly Jewish or acolytes of jews. Why? Because it is an exploitative ideology, usually led by jews to begin with.

Btw, they replied telling me that it's not true that you have to give away what you and become poor , and that you can be rich, the only thing to do is remove the politicians because workers won't be corrupted like them. True question is, how can a politician avoid to be corrupted? How for example ancient politicians in greece or in nazi germany manage to be not corrupted?