Welcome to the Temple of Zeus's Official Forums!

Welcome to the official forums for the Temple of Zeus. Please consider registering an account to join our community.

Hitler's racial thinking

Maxter2010

New member
Joined
Nov 14, 2024
Messages
37
Hi,
What do you think of Hitler's racial thinking? Are Poles and Russians, for example, less valuable than Germans?
Thanks for your answers
Hail Father Zeus
HAIL SATYA
 
Your pattern of asking questions is extremely similar to that of another troll - imp lover.

So, if you've returned, be ready to be kicked out again :)
 
I want, that you are know, that i don't want to troll anybody. I'm here to ask questions about ny life and Father Zeus. If you are thinking, that I'm a troll, please believe me, that this is my only account and I never been bad to anybody.
 
No, a Russian person is not less valuable than a German person by default.

You can't claim the lives of your enemy are as valuable as your own people in a war. They were fighting a war. Not exactly the time for ☮️ ✌️🕊️ hippies.

Poles and Russians are welcome to dedicate and advance as everyone else.
 
Greetings!

Please read Third Reich's main reference book on races:

Hans F. K. Günther. The Racial Elements of European History
- it is freely available in the internet.

This is where Hitler and his Reich derived their racial stances from. As you can see all Slav nations are fully and rightfully part of White Race and are unique and beautiful in their own national traits. Günther specially notes their extreme talent in music and other fine arts.
 
Greetings!

Please read Third Reich's main reference book on races:

Hans F. K. Günther. The Racial Elements of European History
- it is freely available in the internet.

This is where Hitler and his Reich derived their racial stances from. As you can see all Slav nations are fully and rightfully part of White Race and are unique and beautiful in their own national traits. Günther specially notes their extreme talent in music and other fine arts.
Then why did Hitler call slavs natural slaves in the table talks and wanted to keep them in a lowly peasant status after the war?
From what I read, Hitler had this to say about the Slavs from his Table Talks during 1941-44

These ones you'll find on September 17 1941:

"The Slavs are a mass of born slaves, who feel the need of a master. As far as we are concerned, we may think that the Bolsheviks did us a great service. They began by distributing the land to the peasants, and we know what a frightful famine resulted. So they were obliged, of course, to reestablish a sort of feudal régime, to the benefit of the State."

"It’s not a mere chance that the inventor of anarchism was a Russian. Unless other peoples, beginning with the Vikings, had imported some rudiments of organization into Russian humanity, the Russians would still be living like rabbits. One cannot change rabbits into bees or ants. These insects have the faculty of living in a state of society—but rabbits haven’t.

If left to himself, the Slav would never have emerged from the narrowest of family communities.
The Germanic race created the notion of the State. It incarnated this notion in reality, by compelling the individual to be a part of a whole. It’s our duty continually to arouse the forces that slumber in our people’s blood.

The Slav peoples are not destined to live a cleanly life. They know it, and we would be wrong to persuade them of the contrary. It was we who, in 1918, created the Baltic countries and the Ukraine. But nowadays we have no interest in maintaining Baltic States, any more than in creating an independent Ukraine. We must likewise prevent them from returning to Christianity. That would be a grave fault, for it would be giving them a form of organization.
I am not a partisan, either, of a university at Kiev. It’s better not to teach them to read. They won’t love us for tormenting them with schools. Even to give them a locomotive to drive would be a mistake. And what stupidity it would be on our part to proceed to a distribution of land! In spite of that, we’ll see to it that the natives live better than they’ve lived hitherto. We’ll find amongst them the human material that’s indispensable for tilling the soil."

This one is from April 11 1942:

"Above all, we don’t want a horde of schoolmasters to descend suddenly on these territories and force education down the throats of subject races. To teach the Russians, the Ukrainians and the Kirghiz to read and write will eventually be to our own disadvantage; education will give the more intelligent among them an opportunity to study history, to acquire an historical sense and hence to develop political ideas which cannot but be harmful to our interests. A loudspeaker should be installed in each village, to provide them with odd items of news and, above all, to afford distraction. What possible use to them would a knowledge of politics or economics be? There is also no point in broadcasting any stories of their past history—all the villagers require is music, music and plenty of it. Cheerful music is a great incentive to hard work; give them plenty of opportunities to dance, and the villagers will be grateful to us. The soundness of these views is proved by our experience at home during the time of the Weimar Republic"


This one is from August 6, 1942:

"As for the ridiculous hundred million Slavs, we will mould the best of them to the shape that suits us, and we will isolate the rest of them in their own pigstyes; and anyone who talks about cherishing the local inhabitant and civilizing him, goes straight off into a concentration camp!"


Personally, I find what he said distasteful. He essentially viewed and wanted to treat the Slavs in a very similar manner to how the jews view and want to treat the Gentiles, unless what I listed above is completely fabricated somehow. If so, I'd be happy to be corrected on the matter. Truth on this subject is important.

Regardless of what he did or didn't say, all Whites like all other races should be united, without any hate or infighting.

I don’t endorse these views of course. They are what he said though.
 
Then why did Hitler call slavs natural slaves in the table talks and wanted to keep them in a lowly peasant status after the war?


I don’t endorse these views of course. They are what he said though.
I dont speak for anyone but "natural slave" might be a cras, or even "politically incorrect" way to express that certain groups of people within each race rather be workers than leaders of civilizations.

I have worked with many slavs growing up. They work hard af and proud of it. Many having small companies or just the right degrees for their area of expertise; construction or things related to it.

We all know of liberal men in civilized nations that want leaders to tell them what to do and give them what they need in life, we saw this is 100% part of reality during covid.

Not everyone will be a thought leader. The majority of people don't want to study the mysticism of the Gods and lead their nations thru Them.

The bigger problem is the lie the enemy told people that the average person without deserves to be treated as royalty and just live in a pod and be useless to society while receiving everything the rich buys with their hard earn money.

I can work on articulating this a bit better but I think the point is starting to be clear.

So I am not speaking about having cattle slavery back. As those times were horrendous and barbaric but the actual topic ties into more into the reality of the servants of the ancient past.

Not that they were mistreated as a whole and not given a chance to come in society but that everyone was more realistic into where they stood in the grand scheme of things. In an ideal society it's best to give the people to have the basic things of living as long as they do their part in society but individuals should understand this doesn't mean luxury but a roof over their head and healthy food and water and access to the economy.



I dont find the above as a crude way of living whatsoever. How can ants and bees be the best cohesive example on earth but humans can't figure out how to work with each other. As always we are supposed to take these primal examples and transmute it to work on a higher plane with our intelligence.

Even as Zevists, it is noble to be servants of not just the Gods but those above us like the Priests/esses. Its on a higher plane than being shoemakers, or what have you, but the duty of serving the community is still there. Physical life is about work, not pleasure. The pleasure comes WITH the hard work just like an apple tree takes years to fully grow but eventually those fruits come in. In the mean time we work hard to cultivate the tree and not get mad or impatient for the tree to fully mature.

I hope the above is close to what the meaning of those words meant as I am only following the line of logic rationality and leaving out emotional bias as best as I can.
 
I dont speak for anyone but "natural slave" might be a cras, or even "politically incorrect" way to express that certain groups of people within each race rather be workers than leaders of civilizations.

I have worked with many slavs growing up. They work hard af and proud of it. Many having small companies or just the right degrees for their area of expertise; construction or things related to it.

We all know of liberal men in civilized nations that want leaders to tell them what to do and give them what they need in life, we saw this is 100% part of reality during covid.

Not everyone will be a thought leader. The majority of people don't want to study the mysticism of the Gods and lead their nations thru Them.

The bigger problem is the lie the enemy told people that the average person without deserves to be treated as royalty and just live in a pod and be useless to society while receiving everything the rich buys with their hard earn money.

I can work on articulating this a bit better but I think the point is starting to be clear.

So I am not speaking about having cattle slavery back. As those times were horrendous and barbaric but the actual topic ties into more into the reality of the servants of the ancient past.

Not that they were mistreated as a whole and not given a chance to come in society but that everyone was more realistic into where they stood in the grand scheme of things. In an ideal society it's best to give the people to have the basic things of living as long as they do their part in society but individuals should understand this doesn't mean luxury but a roof over their head and healthy food and water and access to the economy.



I dont find the above as a crude way of living whatsoever. How can ants and bees be the best cohesive example on earth but humans can't figure out how to work with each other. As always we are supposed to take these primal examples and transmute it to work on a higher plane with our intelligence.

Even as Zevists, it is noble to be servants of not just the Gods but those above us like the Priests/esses. Its on a higher plane than being shoemakers, or what have you, but the duty of serving the community is still there. Physical life is about work, not pleasure. The pleasure comes WITH the hard work just like an apple tree takes years to fully grow but eventually those fruits come in. In the mean time we work hard to cultivate the tree and not get mad or impatient for the tree to fully mature.

I hope the above is close to what the meaning of those words meant as I am only following the line of logic rationality and leaving out emotional bias as best as I can.

These aren't my views of Slavs, I thought I made that clear. I'm just quoting what Hitler said of them and what he wanted to do with the Slavs after the war, essentially keep them in a subservient state (but not slavery), simply uneducated farms-people that would grow food for the German nation, as he didn't believe they were meant for much else. He essentially wanted to keep them as serfs and didn't want any German intellecuals to arouse a rebellious spirit in them (paraphrasing what he said, read what I quoted for more detail) through education. Part of Hitler's racial thinking was that Germans were meant to win the struggle against primarily the jews but then also the slavs, who he saw as the grunts of jewish bolshevism. He was essentially a German supremacist and looked down on other Europeans, especially Slavs, although he did admire ancient greece and rome, but not the modern italians and spanish. Another example of his looking down on other Europeans was his complete disintrest in getting rid of Christianity for the Spanish and Italians:

Table Talks 13th December 1941:

"When all is said, we have no reason to wish that the Italians and Spaniards should free themselves from the drug of Christianity. Let’s be the only people who are immunized against the disease"

Hitler's racial views were quite complex. It wasn't really a friend-enemy view but a hierarchical one, with only the jews being seen as a racial enemies to be countered, while other groups were to be kept down for Germany's benefit. He didn't appear interested at all in liberating and enlightening other Gentile groups but in creating an empire for the German people in a post-war world had he won.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Shaitan

Back
Top