Appeasement: The Loophole within Nonviolence

[DisillusionedCitizen]

a pacifist since he’s forgiven thieves, murderers, and usurers but he’s really an appeaser who only wanted to avoid any violence directed toward him. Even if this narrative wasn’t real, Jesus knew his followers would kill him and his followers and expose how much of a liar he is. Because people didn’t understand the difference between pacifism and appeasement (Both of which leads to the same dead end anyway.), Jewsus’s suicidal teachings have persisted for two millennia and has spread to the entire world, with people like Gandhi (an actual example of the above paragraph), and Muhamed. Appeasement can be deceptive and underhanded, and the mainstream media can use them interchangeably within the narrative.
Of course, if the nonviolence/pacifism doesn’t play into appeasement, it certainly leads into it.
In conclusion, I’d say Jews, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Jesus, Gandhi, and any other “pacifists” should not be celebrated in history.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Where's the rest of the post? This had more to it. I know I got a notification saying it was modified, but where's the rest of the post?

 

[Blitzkreig [TG]]

Where's the rest of the post? This had more to it. I know I got a notification saying it was modified, but where's the rest of the post?

This was all there was to it. This sentence: "In conclusion, I’d say Jews, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Jesus, Gandhi, and any other “pacifists” should not be celebrated in history." was at the end of the post; there was nothing else.

It could have been some sort of technical or other error.