Gabriell Braga Nunes Valadao
New member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2004
- Messages
- 5
This article is from a Brazilian blog, so the original is in Portuguese language. Sorry for the english, I used the Google Translator and don’t gave a time to correct it. http://verdade1945.blogspot.com.br/2008 ... eller.html Anne Frank’s Diary: A Bestselling Fraud
Who can believe in the Diary of Anne Frank - symbol of the martyrdom of the Jewish people in World War 2? Simon Wiesenthal, in his book "The killers among us," informs us on page 176, that Anne Frank died in the concentration camp of Bergen Belsen in March 1945, a victim of typhus. Incidentally, one of the few facts that can be considered true mileage across its bibliography. In the same work he states that the father of Anne Frank would have returned in 1946 to the house where he resided in Amsterdam , having found the diary in the same spot on the floor where the soldier "SS" had hurled at the time of the arrest family...
Contrary to the version of Wiesenthal, the weekly magazine headline of March 21, 1992, in a special report on the new "diary" of Anne Frank, reports that the manuscripts, intact, were in the possession of Mrs. Miep Gies from the beginning and only were delivered to Mr. Otto, Anne's father, when it became clear that the girl was no longer part of this world ... Incidentally, at this point, would be interesting to see why Mrs. Miep wanted to ensure that the manuscripts were only revealed after the certainty of death of the author. One gets the impression that he suspected that his father would publish the diaries in absentia, even against the will of his daughter ...
Wiesenthal, in his book, states that "diary" was translated into 32 languages, turned into a play and also a movie that touched the hearts of millions of people - especially teenagers - around the world. It states that even today a large number of young Germans moving to the country annually from Bergen Belsen, to pray for poor Anne.
The [/IMG]</var>n, even more strikingly, after scientific tests of ink used in his writings: it was found that some of the texts were written with a ballpoint pen, an invention of the 50s.
Only due to the discoveries and accusations of historical revisionism is coming down - one by one - the great myths of the "holocaust" of which the "diary" of Anne Frank was one of the most important supporters, mainly to address the hearts and minds of young people.
The truth about the diary of Anne Frank was first revealed by Swedish newspaper Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding payment for his work on a lawsuit against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:
"History has many examples of myths that live a longer life and richer than the truth, and can become more effective than truth."
"The Western world has known some years ago by a Jewish girl who is like her personally written story, The Diary of Anne Frank. Any informed literary inspection would have shown that the book would have been impossible to have been the work of a teenager."
"A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in which the well-known American Jewish writer Meyer Levin won a prize of $ 50,000 paid by the father of Anne Frank as honorarium for the work of Levin in Journal Anne Frank. "
The magazine headline, as quoted above, after admitting that Anne's father had been responsible for "descaracterizações" cuts, censorship, modifications, etc.., Concludes that it would have left the diary very "vulnerable", decreasing evidently the credibility of the same ...
The launch of a new "diary" - a fact which in itself shows a sham within the imposture - demonstrates clearly that the eternal story of counterfeiters try one more throw of the dice to save this unbelievable farce, at least for a while longer. As the magazine's article, we learn that the first version sold over 16 million copies. Probably hoping to repeat the dose with the brand new "daily", now "modernized" and more to the current public taste, even with spicy passages about sexuality girl ... One is left to imagine what will be the third, fourth and dozens of new versions that may ...
The final touch in handling, to end with "golden key" and demonstrate the negligence, bad faith and arrogance own these media outlets omnipotent and accustomed to assert what they please, without investing in defense and ingenuity of the great mass of readers , is up to the photo caption of this matter in the magazine headline that says "... in the photo, Anne in 1941, aged 22" ... And if the legend always said that this character would have died at 13 or 14 years ...
After counterfeiters confessedly admitted that the infamous "diary" is nothing more than a monumental deception, changed, twisted and manipulated to become one of the great "bestsellers" world, it is for our mayors, state legislators, federal and those responsible for education, start firing, doing the only reasonable thing before so much falsehood and infamy: remove the name of this imposture Infinity squares, streets, squares, theaters, schools and other institutions scattered throughout the country and the world.
For over a decade the French professor, professor at the University of Lyon, Robert Faurisson, dissected and debunked, and ruthlessly scientific imposture of the "diary" of Anne Frank. Using the coldness of investigative technique, inherent in every authentic historical researcher, Faurisson has proven, through endless evidence, handling the preparation of the famous "daily" in addition to stripping the fabulously large and profitable business that has turned this historical falsification. An example: only in copyright, the father of the unfortunate girl (who died of typhus while her - and healthy millionaire - his father was hospitalized in Auschwitz and survived) receives sums in all schools! The publication of this story is full of demands and fights between father, uncle, editors, compiler, "ghost writer", etc., all eyeing the endless seam representing ownership of their copyrights.
Faurisson has done an analysis of local interviews held, dissected the "diary", proving the impossibilities psychological, cultural, social, historical, temporal situation, likelihood, logic, space, etc.. It is worthwhile to confirm this extraordinary research: Who wrote the diary of Anne Frank? Robert Faurisson, Review Publishing, 85 pages.
The book is a lesson in research interrogative, ideal for lawyers, forensic technicians, lawyers, police officers, historians, students, etc..
Recently the international news agencies released a small note with the following words: The famous diary of Anne Frank, the Jewish teenager who died in Amsterdam in 1945 in a concentration camp, was censured by the girl's father. He withdrew from the text of notebooks where she wrote, all considered "lurid" and decided to make some changes on their own, for moral reasons or convenience. "No comments.
No doubt the girl Anne Frank is not an imagination, but the story of her diary sure is a great piece of advertising. Even for a layman, there is no problem in verifying that two handwritings were used to write the diary. One is consistent with a typical teenage girl and the other an adult.
Anne Frank was a victim of typhus epidemic that killed thousands of Germans and inmates of concentration camps during the last world war. This makes it clear why the existence of crematoriums and the pesticide Zyklon-B. Unfortunately the farce of the diary is not disclosed by mere commercial reasons. Nobody is interested in killing the goose that lays the golden eggs... Gabriell Braga Nunes Valadão
http://www.exposingchristianity.com
Who can believe in the Diary of Anne Frank - symbol of the martyrdom of the Jewish people in World War 2? Simon Wiesenthal, in his book "The killers among us," informs us on page 176, that Anne Frank died in the concentration camp of Bergen Belsen in March 1945, a victim of typhus. Incidentally, one of the few facts that can be considered true mileage across its bibliography. In the same work he states that the father of Anne Frank would have returned in 1946 to the house where he resided in Amsterdam , having found the diary in the same spot on the floor where the soldier "SS" had hurled at the time of the arrest family...
Contrary to the version of Wiesenthal, the weekly magazine headline of March 21, 1992, in a special report on the new "diary" of Anne Frank, reports that the manuscripts, intact, were in the possession of Mrs. Miep Gies from the beginning and only were delivered to Mr. Otto, Anne's father, when it became clear that the girl was no longer part of this world ... Incidentally, at this point, would be interesting to see why Mrs. Miep wanted to ensure that the manuscripts were only revealed after the certainty of death of the author. One gets the impression that he suspected that his father would publish the diaries in absentia, even against the will of his daughter ...
Wiesenthal, in his book, states that "diary" was translated into 32 languages, turned into a play and also a movie that touched the hearts of millions of people - especially teenagers - around the world. It states that even today a large number of young Germans moving to the country annually from Bergen Belsen, to pray for poor Anne.
The [/IMG]</var>n, even more strikingly, after scientific tests of ink used in his writings: it was found that some of the texts were written with a ballpoint pen, an invention of the 50s.
Only due to the discoveries and accusations of historical revisionism is coming down - one by one - the great myths of the "holocaust" of which the "diary" of Anne Frank was one of the most important supporters, mainly to address the hearts and minds of young people.
The truth about the diary of Anne Frank was first revealed by Swedish newspaper Fria Ord. It established that the Jewish novelist Meyer Levin had written the dialogue of the "diary" and was demanding payment for his work on a lawsuit against Otto Frank. A condensation of the Swedish articles appeared in the American Economic Council Letter, April 15, 1959, as follows:
"History has many examples of myths that live a longer life and richer than the truth, and can become more effective than truth."
"The Western world has known some years ago by a Jewish girl who is like her personally written story, The Diary of Anne Frank. Any informed literary inspection would have shown that the book would have been impossible to have been the work of a teenager."
"A noteworthy decision of the New York Supreme Court confirms this point of view, in which the well-known American Jewish writer Meyer Levin won a prize of $ 50,000 paid by the father of Anne Frank as honorarium for the work of Levin in Journal Anne Frank. "
The magazine headline, as quoted above, after admitting that Anne's father had been responsible for "descaracterizações" cuts, censorship, modifications, etc.., Concludes that it would have left the diary very "vulnerable", decreasing evidently the credibility of the same ...
The launch of a new "diary" - a fact which in itself shows a sham within the imposture - demonstrates clearly that the eternal story of counterfeiters try one more throw of the dice to save this unbelievable farce, at least for a while longer. As the magazine's article, we learn that the first version sold over 16 million copies. Probably hoping to repeat the dose with the brand new "daily", now "modernized" and more to the current public taste, even with spicy passages about sexuality girl ... One is left to imagine what will be the third, fourth and dozens of new versions that may ...
The final touch in handling, to end with "golden key" and demonstrate the negligence, bad faith and arrogance own these media outlets omnipotent and accustomed to assert what they please, without investing in defense and ingenuity of the great mass of readers , is up to the photo caption of this matter in the magazine headline that says "... in the photo, Anne in 1941, aged 22" ... And if the legend always said that this character would have died at 13 or 14 years ...
After counterfeiters confessedly admitted that the infamous "diary" is nothing more than a monumental deception, changed, twisted and manipulated to become one of the great "bestsellers" world, it is for our mayors, state legislators, federal and those responsible for education, start firing, doing the only reasonable thing before so much falsehood and infamy: remove the name of this imposture Infinity squares, streets, squares, theaters, schools and other institutions scattered throughout the country and the world.
For over a decade the French professor, professor at the University of Lyon, Robert Faurisson, dissected and debunked, and ruthlessly scientific imposture of the "diary" of Anne Frank. Using the coldness of investigative technique, inherent in every authentic historical researcher, Faurisson has proven, through endless evidence, handling the preparation of the famous "daily" in addition to stripping the fabulously large and profitable business that has turned this historical falsification. An example: only in copyright, the father of the unfortunate girl (who died of typhus while her - and healthy millionaire - his father was hospitalized in Auschwitz and survived) receives sums in all schools! The publication of this story is full of demands and fights between father, uncle, editors, compiler, "ghost writer", etc., all eyeing the endless seam representing ownership of their copyrights.
Faurisson has done an analysis of local interviews held, dissected the "diary", proving the impossibilities psychological, cultural, social, historical, temporal situation, likelihood, logic, space, etc.. It is worthwhile to confirm this extraordinary research: Who wrote the diary of Anne Frank? Robert Faurisson, Review Publishing, 85 pages.
The book is a lesson in research interrogative, ideal for lawyers, forensic technicians, lawyers, police officers, historians, students, etc..
Recently the international news agencies released a small note with the following words: The famous diary of Anne Frank, the Jewish teenager who died in Amsterdam in 1945 in a concentration camp, was censured by the girl's father. He withdrew from the text of notebooks where she wrote, all considered "lurid" and decided to make some changes on their own, for moral reasons or convenience. "No comments.
No doubt the girl Anne Frank is not an imagination, but the story of her diary sure is a great piece of advertising. Even for a layman, there is no problem in verifying that two handwritings were used to write the diary. One is consistent with a typical teenage girl and the other an adult.
Anne Frank was a victim of typhus epidemic that killed thousands of Germans and inmates of concentration camps during the last world war. This makes it clear why the existence of crematoriums and the pesticide Zyklon-B. Unfortunately the farce of the diary is not disclosed by mere commercial reasons. Nobody is interested in killing the goose that lays the golden eggs... Gabriell Braga Nunes Valadão
http://www.exposingchristianity.com
