Edward Lonsa1
Member
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2012
- Messages
- 172
When one opens himself to Satanism, they open themselves to the Truth. The last is not always pleasant. Here I am going relate some information about The Yarovaya Law, what blood it costs to Russian taxpayers and what disgusting effects it has:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarovaya_Law
If one hears this term first time, here it is in short:1. Internet provider gives absolutelly everything - from your intimate photo to any word you wrote to a friend, any site you visited, everything you did on your computer, any click - to the FSB.2. Internet provider gives all keys to everything - to any and all bites of information, all cryptography, even if his know-how is concerned, to FSB WITHOUT HESITATION or his business is closed and he is presecuted legally.
3. If you use any encrypt traffic (VPN, Tor etc.) your Internet provider MUST decrypt it for FSB himself. If he fails, his business is closed and he is presecuted legally.
4. YOU give every and all personal info about your loved ones, children, friends and anyone else who ever (even for a second) used or can use your connection to the internet.5. All laws criminalizing free speach are severed, prison terms are lengthened to an unbelievable extent.
6. If you want to make your religion public you must report yourself to FSB and if they like a religion they give you a licence to make it public. And all your practices must be thorowly listed and registered in FSB.7. Your internet provider MUST afford all the above THEMSELVES (which are billions). If they fail, their internet-providing busines is closed and you lose your internet.
Further goes the article of what kind of war is waged against the Internet and its principles at the state level, what countless billions are invested into it in a semi-impoverished country, where corruption and crime flourish, where corrupted officials, outright oligarch gangsters with a completely stolen fortune are totally out of control. There is not enough police, if you call it, it arrives in a few hours after a call even in the most severe cases of assault, violence, etc. There are not enough vacances, salaries for the police officers, doctors and other civil servants, pensions are about for which one can only die - especially in the province, you can see it for yourself here https://www.klerk.ru/buh/articles/481118/ just google Russian RUB to American Dollar and count in dollars. I saw even around the capital the salaries lower than these pensions.
In all these conditions, just note what enormous unbelievable wealth is being invested into VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, such as the right to access any knowledge, any non-personal information, freedom of speech, etc. At the same time, such absolute knowledge and access, even to personal information, remains and expands among the special services. Of course, like everything since 1917, this happens AGAINST the UNANIMOUS WILL of the RUSSIAN AND ANY OTHER NON-JEWISH PEOPLE.
Also note how not only Red China but even other countries even those of the "Western block" are glad and ready to help Russian government to make slaves out of their citizens.
"The first purchase of equipment cost Rostelecom 3 billion rubles," Vedomosti reports. The storage systems (SHD) were selected for the domestic production of Kupol modular systems. According to the source, the purchase volume includes 4,000 racks, and the total the storage capacity is 319.3 petabytes. ""In a month and a half, on July 1, the basic norms of the" Spring Law "come into force ...In anticipation of this event, DP had the first commercial offer for telecom operators from the large company MFI Soft, which is part of the Citadel holding (linked to Alisher Usmanov), a hardware-software complex for storing Internet traffic of users with a minimum cost of 37 million rubles.
According to the calculations of the telecommunications market participants, this complex for 37 million rubles will be enough to store traffic for about 10 thousand subscribers [only!] of a wireline operator (more in the case of a mobile operator). "
"Only according to preliminary estimates, the cost of implementing the Spring Law for telecommunications companies and telecom operators will be about 5 trillion rubles."
Etc. Further article.
Electrofiltration of the whole country
Who will earn on the law on "sovereign runet"
“This week, the Federation Council approved amendments to the laws“ On Communications ”and“ On Information ”, which stipulate the installation of equipment on the networks of operators for managing traffic routes and filtering it. According to Kommersant’s information, Russia may need help abroad - for example, French technology, which, according to the media, allegedly had already successfully tested the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, but even if the bill’s special period for disconnecting RuNet from foreign networks never sets in, the new rudovanie will not be idle. It is useful to have long lobbied telecoms operators abolition of network neutrality, which will take charge with the Internet companies for high-speed access to their servers.
Peek into every package
The amendments to the laws “On Communications” and “On Information” approved by the Federation Council on April 22, known as the “sovereign Runet” bill, essentially change the rules for blocking prohibited information in Russia:
the state has the opportunity to switch Runet to centralized management, but only if there is a threat to its stability;
telecom operators will be required to participate in the exercises;
a national domain name system is being created (it will be applied from 2021);
government agencies will have to switch to national cryptography standards.The government, the Ministry of Communications and Communications and Roskomnadzor have yet to specify these provisions and their details. They need to develop about 30 by-laws by November 1, 2019.
One of the most significant points of the future law will be the introduction by the state of the DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) system - “means of countering threats” that Roskomnadzor will provide telecom operators. The essence of DPI technology is, in particular, in the ability to analyze Internet traffic and transmitted network packets, actually examine their contents and filter according to specified criteria.
As conceived by the authors of the bill, this should make it easier for operators to restrict access to sites banned in Russia. But the idea of legislative expansion of Roskomnadzor’s powers to manage the network and implement locks did not please market participants.
Potential network interruptions will require compensation to operators from the budget in the amount of at least 134 billion rubles per year, counted back in December in the working group "Communication and IT" of the expert council under the government. However, officials have repeatedly assured that the equipment will not adversely affect data transfer speeds.
The website of Roskomnadzor has a page with conclusions on traffic filtering systems, tests of which have been carried out since 2017. Most of the 12 products tested were recommended for use to restrict access to banned sites. Among their manufacturers are VAS Experts, ADM Systems, Napa Labs and RDP.ru, 15% of which belong to the Rostelecom investment fund.
The regulator recognized the decisions of the latter as the best, says one of Kommersant's interlocutors in the industry. RDP.ru co-owner Anton Sushkevich (25.01%) could not confirm this information to Kommersant, but confirmed that the company's equipment successfully passed testing conducted in March on one of Rostelecom's networks. When choosing a supplier, the authorities will be guided by domestic players, and “it is unlikely that anyone will have enough lobbying power to fight Rostelecom in this meadow,” Kommersant’s source said.
Will abroad help us?
The companies that have successfully passed the tests indicate in the accompanying documentation various ways of installing equipment on the networks of operators, while this issue is not spelled out in detail in the bill itself. A possible scheme for installing equipment for one number of the autonomous system (the telecom operator may have several dozen) for Kommersant was made by the director general of the Diphost provider Philip Kulin (see figure).
The exact specifications and the filling of the equipment to be used are also still unknown. However, as Kommersant learned, the software component can be provided by the large French company Qosmos, owned by the Swedish Enea.
“There is an assumption in technical circles that Qosmos will provide the libraries planned for use (for software.” “Kommersant”) in the equipment planned for installation, ”one of the interlocutors familiar with the situation said. In his opinion, these libraries can be used in RDP.ru solutions. Anton Sushkevich objects that their product is “completely domestic”.
Another interlocutor of Kommersant in the communications market also heard that Qosmos in one form or another wants to participate in the supply of solutions for the implementation of the law on sovereign runet. According to him, the French developer has already registered a Russian legal entity for this, but failed to find it in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.
Qosmos itself did not respond to the request. Enea’s senior vice president of marketing and communications, Eric Larsson, insists that the company "is not participating and does not plan to participate in government tenders in Russia." At the same time, Qosmos continues to work with Russian partners. Mr. Larsson declined to name all the companies, citing commercial agreements, but noted, in particular, St. Petersburg Proteus, which uses the Qosmos ixEngine traffic classifier as a built-in library in its DPI platform. Qosmos solutions are used by at least one other Russian company - ADM Systems, whose DPI equipment has been tested by Roskomnadzor.
President of the Media and Communication Union Mikhail Demin: “We are talking about the partial abolition of network neutrality today”
Qosmos already has experience working abroad. In 2011, Bloomberg reported that the French company’s products were used by the Syrian authorities to spy on political opponents of Bashar al-Assad as part of the Asfador project. In the same year, a number of internal Qosmos documents were published on the WikiLeaks website, one of which, in particular, addressed the issue of identifying network users as part of a “lawful interception” of traffic.
In response to the publication, the company said it was only selling technology components to third-party suppliers and “shared the concern about the abuse of tracking equipment.” “Qosmos left the Syrian project Asfador - the decision was made before the development of the system was completed, and before the publication of Bloomberg,” the French developer said in a release. She also pledged not to deliver her solutions to companies that sell them to "authoritarian regimes." Later, Qosmos began to refute the information that its products or components were in principle used in Syria, and even sued France 24 and its former employee because of this.
Network hostility
The risks of deterioration in the quality of the network that telecom operators will use when placing DPI equipment can be offset by another function. The technology is capable of not only filtering information packets from forbidden sites or messengers, but also limiting the speed of access to completely legal ones. This would mean the abolition of network neutrality actually operating in Russia - the principle according to which Internet providers cannot give preference to the traffic of certain resources and slow down or block others at their discretion.
Now in Russia, network neutrality is enshrined only by the FAS “non-legally binding status” that was signed by market participants in 2016. In it, such traffic control is allowed only, for example, in emergency situations, and the provision of services “with the best quality” - with the expressed desire of the subscriber.
The approaches to the principle of network neutrality, as well as its interpretation, differ greatly in different countries, even within the European Union there are several approaches. In the United States, the principle of network neutrality was introduced in 2015 under President Barack Obama, but even then he began to be criticized for the vague wording and the possibility of circumvention. After Donald Trump came to power, the U.S. Communications Market Regulatory Commission in 2017 abolished the principle of network neutrality.
In Russia, the idea of eliminating network neutrality really began to be widely discussed in 2018 at the initiative of the Media and Communication Union, which unites the largest Internet providers and media holdings. Disagreements arose between the authorities and the industry: Deputy Prime Minister Maxim Akimov pointed out that the elimination of network neutrality was not provided for in any of the projects of the Digital Economy program, while the president of Rostelecom Mikhail Oseevsky said that it would help operators offset the costs of "Spring law."
In a March interview with Kommersant, Mr. Oseevsky again opposed network neutrality: “We are investing huge amounts of money in transferring gigantic volumes of traffic, but our own incomes are growing by interest, and many earn much more. DPI technologies are needed primarily to equalize all those who find themselves in this situation. "
With this question, the industry turned to the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, in the framework of the RIW forum in November 2018. The official doubted that "refined" network neutrality is possible in principle. “As this amount of real life and the economy comes to the Internet, the costs will certainly be different. The need to distribute profit and profitability from this activity will fuel the degree of activity of telecom operators. The only thing that seems right to me is: network neutrality is the place where you can start the agreement of players in the market, ”the official said, inviting market participants to negotiate with each other.
The adoption of the law on “sovereign runet” may become a new trigger for rejecting the basic principles of network neutrality, the source of “Kommersant” in expert circles believes. In his opinion, this can be seen, in particular, in the fact that the most probable enforcer of the law regarding the installation of “countermeasures to threats” is 15% owned by Rostelecom, which openly expresses its interest in eliminating network neutrality.
Another important point is that the law did not include amendments proposed by the government and the Russian Association of Electronic Communications that the means of countering threats are established “based on the necessity of non-deterioration of the technological capabilities of the telecom operator in terms of information transfer speed”. However, according to experts, it is likely that the item will appear in one of the by-laws.
“I have to admit that, most likely, the abolition of network neutrality in Russia is almost a fait accompli. We are one minute away from this, ”said Alexander Lyamin, Qrator Labs CEO, pessimistic. According to him, the DPI equipment, which is actually spoken of in the law, is perfect for prioritizing traffic, "and since the tools appear, it means that it is tempting to take money from content companies." The high quality of Internet in the country has so far been ensured by healthy competition in the market, but the ongoing monopolization and new regulation will lead to the fact that the cost of the Internet can significantly increase, and the quality can fall, Mr. Lyamin emphasizes. For users, in his opinion, price increases can reach tens of percent. "
-Dmitry Shestoperov, Evgeny Khvostik
newspaper Kommersant
Sources - News:
https://www.dp.ru/a/2018/05/15/Cena_zakonoproslushanija
https://4pda.ru/2019/07/30/359709/
https://businessman.ru/zakon-yarovoy-ch ... akona.html
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3955385?from=doc_vrez
[in the next part I am going to relate real life stories of courts, legal presecution and destroyed Internet providers, I hope this information will be spread and made public]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yarovaya_Law
If one hears this term first time, here it is in short:1. Internet provider gives absolutelly everything - from your intimate photo to any word you wrote to a friend, any site you visited, everything you did on your computer, any click - to the FSB.2. Internet provider gives all keys to everything - to any and all bites of information, all cryptography, even if his know-how is concerned, to FSB WITHOUT HESITATION or his business is closed and he is presecuted legally.
3. If you use any encrypt traffic (VPN, Tor etc.) your Internet provider MUST decrypt it for FSB himself. If he fails, his business is closed and he is presecuted legally.
4. YOU give every and all personal info about your loved ones, children, friends and anyone else who ever (even for a second) used or can use your connection to the internet.5. All laws criminalizing free speach are severed, prison terms are lengthened to an unbelievable extent.
6. If you want to make your religion public you must report yourself to FSB and if they like a religion they give you a licence to make it public. And all your practices must be thorowly listed and registered in FSB.7. Your internet provider MUST afford all the above THEMSELVES (which are billions). If they fail, their internet-providing busines is closed and you lose your internet.
Further goes the article of what kind of war is waged against the Internet and its principles at the state level, what countless billions are invested into it in a semi-impoverished country, where corruption and crime flourish, where corrupted officials, outright oligarch gangsters with a completely stolen fortune are totally out of control. There is not enough police, if you call it, it arrives in a few hours after a call even in the most severe cases of assault, violence, etc. There are not enough vacances, salaries for the police officers, doctors and other civil servants, pensions are about for which one can only die - especially in the province, you can see it for yourself here https://www.klerk.ru/buh/articles/481118/ just google Russian RUB to American Dollar and count in dollars. I saw even around the capital the salaries lower than these pensions.
In all these conditions, just note what enormous unbelievable wealth is being invested into VIOLATIONS OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS, such as the right to access any knowledge, any non-personal information, freedom of speech, etc. At the same time, such absolute knowledge and access, even to personal information, remains and expands among the special services. Of course, like everything since 1917, this happens AGAINST the UNANIMOUS WILL of the RUSSIAN AND ANY OTHER NON-JEWISH PEOPLE.
Also note how not only Red China but even other countries even those of the "Western block" are glad and ready to help Russian government to make slaves out of their citizens.
"The first purchase of equipment cost Rostelecom 3 billion rubles," Vedomosti reports. The storage systems (SHD) were selected for the domestic production of Kupol modular systems. According to the source, the purchase volume includes 4,000 racks, and the total the storage capacity is 319.3 petabytes. ""In a month and a half, on July 1, the basic norms of the" Spring Law "come into force ...In anticipation of this event, DP had the first commercial offer for telecom operators from the large company MFI Soft, which is part of the Citadel holding (linked to Alisher Usmanov), a hardware-software complex for storing Internet traffic of users with a minimum cost of 37 million rubles.
According to the calculations of the telecommunications market participants, this complex for 37 million rubles will be enough to store traffic for about 10 thousand subscribers [only!] of a wireline operator (more in the case of a mobile operator). "
"Only according to preliminary estimates, the cost of implementing the Spring Law for telecommunications companies and telecom operators will be about 5 trillion rubles."
Etc. Further article.
Electrofiltration of the whole country
Who will earn on the law on "sovereign runet"
“This week, the Federation Council approved amendments to the laws“ On Communications ”and“ On Information ”, which stipulate the installation of equipment on the networks of operators for managing traffic routes and filtering it. According to Kommersant’s information, Russia may need help abroad - for example, French technology, which, according to the media, allegedly had already successfully tested the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, but even if the bill’s special period for disconnecting RuNet from foreign networks never sets in, the new rudovanie will not be idle. It is useful to have long lobbied telecoms operators abolition of network neutrality, which will take charge with the Internet companies for high-speed access to their servers.
Peek into every package
The amendments to the laws “On Communications” and “On Information” approved by the Federation Council on April 22, known as the “sovereign Runet” bill, essentially change the rules for blocking prohibited information in Russia:
the state has the opportunity to switch Runet to centralized management, but only if there is a threat to its stability;
telecom operators will be required to participate in the exercises;
a national domain name system is being created (it will be applied from 2021);
government agencies will have to switch to national cryptography standards.The government, the Ministry of Communications and Communications and Roskomnadzor have yet to specify these provisions and their details. They need to develop about 30 by-laws by November 1, 2019.
One of the most significant points of the future law will be the introduction by the state of the DPI (Deep Packet Inspection) system - “means of countering threats” that Roskomnadzor will provide telecom operators. The essence of DPI technology is, in particular, in the ability to analyze Internet traffic and transmitted network packets, actually examine their contents and filter according to specified criteria.
As conceived by the authors of the bill, this should make it easier for operators to restrict access to sites banned in Russia. But the idea of legislative expansion of Roskomnadzor’s powers to manage the network and implement locks did not please market participants.
Potential network interruptions will require compensation to operators from the budget in the amount of at least 134 billion rubles per year, counted back in December in the working group "Communication and IT" of the expert council under the government. However, officials have repeatedly assured that the equipment will not adversely affect data transfer speeds.
The website of Roskomnadzor has a page with conclusions on traffic filtering systems, tests of which have been carried out since 2017. Most of the 12 products tested were recommended for use to restrict access to banned sites. Among their manufacturers are VAS Experts, ADM Systems, Napa Labs and RDP.ru, 15% of which belong to the Rostelecom investment fund.
The regulator recognized the decisions of the latter as the best, says one of Kommersant's interlocutors in the industry. RDP.ru co-owner Anton Sushkevich (25.01%) could not confirm this information to Kommersant, but confirmed that the company's equipment successfully passed testing conducted in March on one of Rostelecom's networks. When choosing a supplier, the authorities will be guided by domestic players, and “it is unlikely that anyone will have enough lobbying power to fight Rostelecom in this meadow,” Kommersant’s source said.
Will abroad help us?
The companies that have successfully passed the tests indicate in the accompanying documentation various ways of installing equipment on the networks of operators, while this issue is not spelled out in detail in the bill itself. A possible scheme for installing equipment for one number of the autonomous system (the telecom operator may have several dozen) for Kommersant was made by the director general of the Diphost provider Philip Kulin (see figure).
The exact specifications and the filling of the equipment to be used are also still unknown. However, as Kommersant learned, the software component can be provided by the large French company Qosmos, owned by the Swedish Enea.
“There is an assumption in technical circles that Qosmos will provide the libraries planned for use (for software.” “Kommersant”) in the equipment planned for installation, ”one of the interlocutors familiar with the situation said. In his opinion, these libraries can be used in RDP.ru solutions. Anton Sushkevich objects that their product is “completely domestic”.
Another interlocutor of Kommersant in the communications market also heard that Qosmos in one form or another wants to participate in the supply of solutions for the implementation of the law on sovereign runet. According to him, the French developer has already registered a Russian legal entity for this, but failed to find it in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities.
Qosmos itself did not respond to the request. Enea’s senior vice president of marketing and communications, Eric Larsson, insists that the company "is not participating and does not plan to participate in government tenders in Russia." At the same time, Qosmos continues to work with Russian partners. Mr. Larsson declined to name all the companies, citing commercial agreements, but noted, in particular, St. Petersburg Proteus, which uses the Qosmos ixEngine traffic classifier as a built-in library in its DPI platform. Qosmos solutions are used by at least one other Russian company - ADM Systems, whose DPI equipment has been tested by Roskomnadzor.
President of the Media and Communication Union Mikhail Demin: “We are talking about the partial abolition of network neutrality today”
Qosmos already has experience working abroad. In 2011, Bloomberg reported that the French company’s products were used by the Syrian authorities to spy on political opponents of Bashar al-Assad as part of the Asfador project. In the same year, a number of internal Qosmos documents were published on the WikiLeaks website, one of which, in particular, addressed the issue of identifying network users as part of a “lawful interception” of traffic.
In response to the publication, the company said it was only selling technology components to third-party suppliers and “shared the concern about the abuse of tracking equipment.” “Qosmos left the Syrian project Asfador - the decision was made before the development of the system was completed, and before the publication of Bloomberg,” the French developer said in a release. She also pledged not to deliver her solutions to companies that sell them to "authoritarian regimes." Later, Qosmos began to refute the information that its products or components were in principle used in Syria, and even sued France 24 and its former employee because of this.
Network hostility
The risks of deterioration in the quality of the network that telecom operators will use when placing DPI equipment can be offset by another function. The technology is capable of not only filtering information packets from forbidden sites or messengers, but also limiting the speed of access to completely legal ones. This would mean the abolition of network neutrality actually operating in Russia - the principle according to which Internet providers cannot give preference to the traffic of certain resources and slow down or block others at their discretion.
Now in Russia, network neutrality is enshrined only by the FAS “non-legally binding status” that was signed by market participants in 2016. In it, such traffic control is allowed only, for example, in emergency situations, and the provision of services “with the best quality” - with the expressed desire of the subscriber.
The approaches to the principle of network neutrality, as well as its interpretation, differ greatly in different countries, even within the European Union there are several approaches. In the United States, the principle of network neutrality was introduced in 2015 under President Barack Obama, but even then he began to be criticized for the vague wording and the possibility of circumvention. After Donald Trump came to power, the U.S. Communications Market Regulatory Commission in 2017 abolished the principle of network neutrality.
In Russia, the idea of eliminating network neutrality really began to be widely discussed in 2018 at the initiative of the Media and Communication Union, which unites the largest Internet providers and media holdings. Disagreements arose between the authorities and the industry: Deputy Prime Minister Maxim Akimov pointed out that the elimination of network neutrality was not provided for in any of the projects of the Digital Economy program, while the president of Rostelecom Mikhail Oseevsky said that it would help operators offset the costs of "Spring law."
In a March interview with Kommersant, Mr. Oseevsky again opposed network neutrality: “We are investing huge amounts of money in transferring gigantic volumes of traffic, but our own incomes are growing by interest, and many earn much more. DPI technologies are needed primarily to equalize all those who find themselves in this situation. "
With this question, the industry turned to the first deputy head of the presidential administration, Sergei Kiriyenko, in the framework of the RIW forum in November 2018. The official doubted that "refined" network neutrality is possible in principle. “As this amount of real life and the economy comes to the Internet, the costs will certainly be different. The need to distribute profit and profitability from this activity will fuel the degree of activity of telecom operators. The only thing that seems right to me is: network neutrality is the place where you can start the agreement of players in the market, ”the official said, inviting market participants to negotiate with each other.
The adoption of the law on “sovereign runet” may become a new trigger for rejecting the basic principles of network neutrality, the source of “Kommersant” in expert circles believes. In his opinion, this can be seen, in particular, in the fact that the most probable enforcer of the law regarding the installation of “countermeasures to threats” is 15% owned by Rostelecom, which openly expresses its interest in eliminating network neutrality.
Another important point is that the law did not include amendments proposed by the government and the Russian Association of Electronic Communications that the means of countering threats are established “based on the necessity of non-deterioration of the technological capabilities of the telecom operator in terms of information transfer speed”. However, according to experts, it is likely that the item will appear in one of the by-laws.
“I have to admit that, most likely, the abolition of network neutrality in Russia is almost a fait accompli. We are one minute away from this, ”said Alexander Lyamin, Qrator Labs CEO, pessimistic. According to him, the DPI equipment, which is actually spoken of in the law, is perfect for prioritizing traffic, "and since the tools appear, it means that it is tempting to take money from content companies." The high quality of Internet in the country has so far been ensured by healthy competition in the market, but the ongoing monopolization and new regulation will lead to the fact that the cost of the Internet can significantly increase, and the quality can fall, Mr. Lyamin emphasizes. For users, in his opinion, price increases can reach tens of percent. "
-Dmitry Shestoperov, Evgeny Khvostik
newspaper Kommersant
Sources - News:
https://www.dp.ru/a/2018/05/15/Cena_zakonoproslushanija
https://4pda.ru/2019/07/30/359709/
https://businessman.ru/zakon-yarovoy-ch ... akona.html
https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3955385?from=doc_vrez
[in the next part I am going to relate real life stories of courts, legal presecution and destroyed Internet providers, I hope this information will be spread and made public]
