Gay marriage

[Akitu]

Greetings,


Do you think Hitler would have allowed (maybe in a future , stronger Germany after the War) Gay marriage and lesbian marriage?


Unless there already we're but I don't think so, Not because of non acceptance of gaya because that IS so Not true, but because they we're trying top create european pure germans, of pure Blood and because of thus they we're encouraging marriages between men and females (that's why I Say he would have maybe allowed It in a future , without War, where Germany already has grown, especially With Project Lebensborn)

 

[Akitu]

So many corrector Errors , gay*, they Were* trying , to* create, because of this*

 

[-Honestus-]

Probably he wouldn't mention about that. But of course he knew that homosexuality isn't against nature.

 

[Aleksios]

Gay/Lesbian rights have to be protected. I am neither, but the state should take a hand and regulate it.

 

[General Yeager]

Gay relationships did not work the same way in Ancient Greece and Rome the way they are viewed today. You have to research about it from reputable sources. There was no concept of "Gay Marriage" in the Ancient world as Marriage is between a man and a woman for creating children.

 

[Demonic Tech]

...

Why do you post all of your (many) questions in the Activism Subforum?
May I suggest posting your questions in the Main Subforum or in the Ask-Satan Subforum?

 

[Lucifigus]

Greetings,


Do you think Hitler would have allowed (maybe in a future , stronger Germany after the War) Gay marriage and lesbian marriage?


Unless there already we're but I don't think so, Not because of non acceptance of gaya because that IS so Not true, but because they we're trying top create european pure germans, of pure Blood and because of thus they we're encouraging marriages between men and females (that's why I Say he would have maybe allowed It in a future , without War, where Germany already has grown, especially With Project Lebensborn)

I dont know about Hitler, but Satan accepts Spiritual Satanists as they are.

 

[Akitu]

Why do you post all of your (many) questions in the Activism Subforum?
May I suggest posting your questions in the Main Subforum or in the Ask-Satan Subforum?

Okok I'll post there. Sorry

 

[Akitu]

Why do you post all of your (many) questions in the Activism Subforum?
May I suggest posting your questions in the Main Subforum or in the Ask-Satan Subforum?

I know I make a lot of questions, temple of zeus is an open book full of Wisdom for me, I feel I could Learn a lot , if it is a problem I'm going to post less staff

Thanks for all the precious answers

 

[Akitu]

Gay relationships did not work the same way in Ancient Greece and Rome the way they are viewed today. You have to research about it from reputable sources. There was no concept of "Gay Marriage" in the Ancient world as Marriage is between a man and a woman for creating children.

Interesting, so you think they can't or shouldn't be Considered actual marriages

 

[Demonic Tech]

I know I make a lot of questions, temple of zeus is an open book full of Wisdom for me, I feel I could Learn a lot , if it is a problem I'm going to post less staff

Thanks for all the precious answers

You can ask as many questions as you want so long they're worthy, I was only suggesting to post them in more appropriate forums, no issue with the question themselves.
Gods bless you.

 

[General Yeager]

Interesting, so you think they can't or shouldn't be Considered actual marriages

Yes ,i think that marriage particularly is an institution exclusively for a man and a woman and this is borne out of history.

 

[616Taysha]

Interesting, so you think they can't or shouldn't be Considered actual marriages

I do think this way too, , as @General Yeager neatly points out.

However, I've also checked 3 dictionaries (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/marriage), (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/marriage) and (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage) and they all seem to agree that the term 'marriage' is not limited to man-woman only.

Just an interesting tidbit.

 

[General Yeager]

I do think this way too, , as @General Yeager neatly points out.

However, I've also checked 3 dictionaries (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/marriage), (https://www.thefreedictionary.com/marriage) and (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/marriage) and they all seem to agree that the term 'marriage' is not limited to man-woman only.

Just an interesting tidbit.

Those dictionaries probably also do not refer to Transgenderism as a mental illness which it is. So they cannot be trusted.

 

[Stormblood]

Incorrect. Marriage like that has been instituted by the enemy. Marriage is also about rights you gain through the relationship. Your spouse needs to have priority to see you in the hospital if you have an accident for example, as all family members. Without marriage, the other member of a homosexual relationship would be treated as a stranger and not allowed in, which is an incorrect approach.

Marriage is a legal and spiritual institution, existing regardless of sexual orientation.

It is more likely that sex wasn't mentioned at all in the legal definition of marriage until abrahamic religions came. In fact, there weren't even labels for sexual orientation (homo-, bi-, hetero-). These are all modern inventions. You cannot box what's a spectrum. It's like post-abrahamic physicists trying hard to put light into the wave box and the particle box, when it's neither.

Let's not regurgitate "white" "nationalist" nonsense which is based on xtardanity. This isn't the place for that.

 

[fuoco blu 666]

Incorrect. Marriage like that has been instituted by the enemy. Marriage is also about rights you gain through the relationship. Your spouse needs to have priority to see you in the hospital if you have an accident for example, as all family members. Without marriage, the other member of a homosexual relationship would be treated as a stranger and not allowed in, which is an incorrect approach.

Marriage is a legal and spiritual institution, existing regardless of sexual orientation.

It is more likely that sex wasn't mentioned at all in the legal definition of marriage until abrahamic religions came. In fact, there weren't even labels for sexual orientation (homo-, bi-, hetero-). These are all modern inventions. You cannot box what's a spectrum. It's like post-abrahamic physicists trying hard to put light into the wave box and the particle box, when it's neither.

Let's not regurgitate "white" "nationalist" nonsense which is based on xtardanity. This isn't the place for that.

Hi Stormblood I'm very happy to have you back on the forum.

I agree with you about marriage.

I sent you an email