Jack said:
Meteor said:
Bisexuality confuses me too. But I think what it really means is that there can be attraction to both sexes depending on the circumstances. As various circumstances change, the preference may change as well. A bisexual person can go years being exclusively attracted to a specific sex and then suddenly change... But if someone is exclusively attracted to a specific sex for years and there's no sign of them changing, then most people wouldn't really think of them as bisexual, right? But even so it can still change, for example after a breakup or even due to fluctuations in energy (for example due to meditation). If there is a "natural preference" in someone like that, I have no idea what it is.
It's very confusing to me when people say sexuality hardwired in the Soul, although maybe it is and the preference I have right now is my "natural" preference? I mean, it does feel pretty natural to me either way. Maybe it doesn't really matter, and people should just do what feels right to them?
Its the same thing i told you before ,that all sexualities are there in the Genetics of an individual and it is different expressed as we lead different lives and have different souls and astrologies. Earlier it was known in the 60s and 70s that upwards of 40% of individuals identifying as Homosexuals would change their identity to exclusively heterosexual without any kind of coercion or treatment. But that research was banned when the jews stopped approving them and they peddled the demonstratively false claim that sexual identity is something you're born with even though children aren't sexual in nature and develop their sexuality when they go through puberty. We've all seen women going through phases where they claim to be lesbians and then automatically change into heterosexuals after getting with some guy. As far as i can say, exclusively homosexual individuals would be an extreme minority in the populace but now you have 1 in 5 individuals of the populace identifying as gay. This is just statistically impossible.
I didn't really understand what point you were trying to make back then, but now I get it. That makes a lot of sense actually.
I still wonder if I'm bisexual or just straight. I'm currently not sexually interested in women at all, and the guy I'm with now is pretty amazing so I doubt I'll ever be into women again; so can I just call myself straight then despite my past? Do I fit into the "automatically changed to heterosexual" box?
What rather puzzles me is that if a certain person hadn't broken up with me, I would've been willing to settle down with a woman instead... In that alternate reality, wouldn't I be calling myself a lesbian instead? Or did she break up with me because I'm a better fit with a guy anyway, and could such a reality therefore not have existed in the first place? But if it had happened, would it have been "unnatural", or would it have been within my nature? I have no idea.
I'm probably just overthinking it. Maybe it isn't all so black and white and my sexuality is just a bit fluid. Although I feel like it currently makes the most sense for me to just call myself straight, since saying otherwise would just cause unnecessary confusion.