Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

JoS Scholarship & The Academic Disciplines

volk_victory

New member
Joined
Oct 6, 2019
Messages
10
Without any fear of contradiction, even a newcomer such as myself could assert that the academic disciplines have only served to buttress the foundational thinking of the JoS. The San Diego State University literary studies of various Grimoires
indicate that JoS Satanic Witchcraft only proceeds in harmony with the historical record. Of interest to note is how
JoS has been vindicated concerning the teachings of the Hebrew Bible. In her book "GOD, An Anatomy" Professor Francesca Stavrakopoulou points to the true ancient origins, of ""EL" the chief deity of the Canaanite pantheon.

In contrast, there is liable to be a lively debate here with respect to the Jewish mystical tradition. It is clear that Islamic Sufism predates the Jewish Kabbalah (Zohar) by several centuries, but this fact is hardly mentioned. As a rule, though, I believe that JoS would tend to question the esoteric traditions of Rosicrucianism because so many of their teachings
can be traced back to the Yiddish lore.

The question I have is, What sources shall JoS turn to concerning the male & female aspects that predate Sufism?

It could well be that JoS will turn to multiple sources to ponder this issue. In the Babylonian creation account,
The Enuma Elish (also known as The Seven Tablets of Creation), there is a male & female theme surrounding
Apsu & Tiamat. My own personal opinion though is that JoS scholars will turn to different sources to ponder the
question of male/female harmonization. This is a topic that will be addressed again & again by JoS Scholars,
on their journey through life.
 
Seeker_of_jos_wisdom said:
Without any fear of contradiction, even a newcomer such as myself could assert that the academic disciplines have only served to buttress the foundational thinking of the JoS.

I consider myself advanced, and I'm not quite sure where you're getting that from. I can state that most of the Academia is just marxist propaganda:

  • They deny biological races even though genetic evidence shows otherwise
  • They deny biological sex to pander to the mentally insane and the pink-haired feminists
  • They deny anything "supernatural" including magick
  • They deny extraterrestrial beings
  • They promote anti-white BS like the "white privilege" myth and a twisted version of history where only Whites owned slaves (never mind the Barbary slave trade full of White slaves or the fact that jews were overrepresented as slave owners)
  • They still promote the fake "out of Africa" theory even though it has been debunked by Russian scientists decades ago.

And almost everything they say about ancient India is wrong. I'd rather trust a Hindu about the Vedas than the Western Academic, since they distort the Vedas to falsely claim that there are animal and human sacrifices in them.

In contrast to the Western Jewish/Marxist Academics, in China most biologists believe that races are a biological fact and humans evolved independently, they didn't come of a single ancestor in Africa.

Most of these theories came from jews, like race denial really was pioneered by the jews Franz Boas and Stephen Jay Gould, both Marxist jews that had an agenda.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top