Okay first off, I am replying to you here not in an effort to continue the discussion, but rather to try and clarify what I meant in my message to you. I think you are still reasonable enough to talk to, and do have good intentions.
If any of you other people are thinking of replying, be aware that you will not receive a response regardless of what provocations you may employ.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
First, I would say that I am not anymore biased than you are in any way, so what does that mean?
What I mean is that, with us two having opposite opinions on the subject, neither of us is really "qualified" to go in and try to suddenly act as the middleman. Such an act would only be reasonable to do for someone who is actually neutral in the matter.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
And what do you mean about me not having any morals?
...
I never said this. I said you tried to play the moral apostle, trying to act as the middle ground. I am well aware you have morals and never contested this.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
I'm going to try to stop that cancer of a destructive idea from spreading.
That's completely fine and is a noble desire. The point is, there is a difference between wanting to remove jewish advertising for harmful sexual practices, and going around with a list of "acceptable" things and like wanting to roast anyone who doesnt conform to it, to give an example. All I am (and always was) saying is that sexuality and sexual preferences are extremely complex, and that nobody should try to meddle with other people's sexlives directly. That's literally it. I completely agree with removing the jewish garbage that is making some people do harmful things just because they like saw it in porn or whatever.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
and I'm going to suggest them to fix themself and remove the problem. If you think this is cruel or not moral, then I think you are being absolutely ridiculous.
No, like I told you in my other reply, this in itself is okay. The point is that if the other person is not interested in your advice, then after giving it for the first time you shouldnt run after them trying to keep pestering them regardless.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
Isn't the entire point of being a Satanist to fix all of your problems and make yourself more healthy?
It is, just like Satanism is also the religion of
freedom, as well. Cobra said smth about this whole affair in a recent sermon, being that some people, if their actions really are bad and harmful, may have to burn their hands a little in order to learn the lesson. Sometimes direct experience is the best way to learn something.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
You think that me suggesting someone to fix themself and clean out their soul so they would stop trying to do actions which harm themself or someone else, you seem to think that this is the same thing as me personally putting blockages and harm onto that person's 2nd chakra.
No, I think that you trying to categorize people's fetishes into "good" and "bad" and harassing those you disagree with, is synonymous to an attack on their 2nd chakra. The sacral is creative and sensitive, and this is why
it's nobody else's business what two consenting adults do sexually. This statement is literally from Maxine herself. Metaphorically speaking, smacking drug addicts on their heads or arresting them will not solve drug problems. Telling them how bad drugs are wont, either (in most cases). Removing the widespread availability and promotion of drugs however, will fix it and prevent it from even occurring in the first place.
Ol argedco luciftias said:
If I'm directly telling them what the cause of their problem is, and telling them to fix that problem, if anything it's helping them to remove that garbage out of their soul and helping them to make their 2nd chakra cleaner. Or would you prefer for that person to retain that garbage inside of themself? I identify the cause of their problem and tell them how to fix it, and if you think I'm making them become less creative by me doing this, then you are ridiculous. I'd rather have them be a little bit less creative and stop harming themself, than for them to be very creative at thinking up even more ways to hurt themself or others. Who has better morals, the person who explains to someone their problem and tells them how to fix it, or the nihilist who ignores the problem and would prefer for them to keep all that garbage inside themself?
The point is that you yourself already view it as "garbage" from the start. I will not get into some discussion now on what exacly is and is not an "acceptable" fetish, as again, nobody should try to make a list here like some kind of written law. What I write here is not in reference to the specific fetishes you mentioned, but about fetishes in general.
TL;DR
The bottom line is, consensual relations between two people are not the business of anyone else. You can offer help if you do not agree with what they are doing, but you cannot do anything beyond this. The people who would truly be engaging in harmful practices, and dont listen to advice, will learn their lesson for themselves. There is no need to try and force anyone to do anything, past this point.