Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

Facta, Non Verba

Gabriel Lamb

New member
Joined
Nov 12, 2022
Messages
56
Hp HoodedCobra shared this quote in latin from our estimed God Beelzebul.
Which brings me to the question, what about Latin? How close is it to an actual language based upon sacred numerical value and sound frequency?

You can see how in many words it is close to sanskrit like Ignis in latin being similar to Agni from sanskrit. Both meaning fire.
 
Gabriel Lamb said:
Hp HoodedCobra shared this quote in latin from our estimed God Beelzebul.
Which brings me to the question, what about Latin? How close is it to an actual language based upon sacred numerical value and sound frequency?

You can see how in many words it is close to sanskrit like Ignis in latin being similar to Agni from sanskrit. Both meaning fire.
I've heard people talk about how modern languages like english are not very spiritual, but talk about ancient latin and greek as spiritual languages, and above all, sanskrit as the lingua franca of spirituality.

But I don't understand this. If sanskrit is the divine language, the language of the gods and the one with the greatest power, why did we have latin or greek at all, or any other language, for that matter?

Why wasn't sanskrit the universal language of humanity instead of every race and ethnic group developing their own language families?

How come sanskrit isn't used today in india instead of hindi and other modern indian languages?
 
existentialcrisis said:
Gabriel Lamb said:
Hp HoodedCobra shared this quote in latin from our estimed God Beelzebul.
Which brings me to the question, what about Latin? How close is it to an actual language based upon sacred numerical value and sound frequency?

You can see how in many words it is close to sanskrit like Ignis in latin being similar to Agni from sanskrit. Both meaning fire.
I've heard people talk about how modern languages like english are not very spiritual, but talk about ancient latin and greek as spiritual languages, and above all, sanskrit as the lingua franca of spirituality.

But I don't understand this. If sanskrit is the divine language, the language of the gods and the one with the greatest power, why did we have latin or greek at all, or any other language, for that matter?

Why wasn't sanskrit the universal language of humanity instead of every race and ethnic group developing their own language families?

How come sanskrit isn't used today in india instead of hindi and other modern indian languages?

Sanskrit was not the universal language or the "Central" language.

The situation with languages is that Ancient Greek and Sanskrit are Divine. The reasons however are in how they are.

The situation of this is not because Sanskrit is the source, but because of how these languages are. The importance is underlined into what these languages have inside them, and so long a language supports certain principles, it's a Holy Language.

I do believe Ancient Greek is actually as old as Sanskrit and I have personal proof in regards to that. Both languages will lead to Divine outcome. Latin is also included here, and it's derived from the underlying concepts of Ancient Greek and Sanskrit. These were certainly what we refer to as "Demonic Language" or "Language of the Gods".

Egyptian has also been based on the same concepts, but these have been lost and largely corrupted, and that's the only reason it's not in the same category.

As long as the principles are maintained, a language is then Holy. Holy language is not always meant for everyday use. Languages form according to people's, the situation is what of these languages does possess most of the powers the Gods have bestowed on these principles.

Ancient Greek is maxed out and is a "perfect language", same as Sanskrit, equally lofty in perfection of these principles. To understand one must study these, and I have studied both. Egyptian is in the same category, but I could never really study it due to lack of connections and true teaching of the language, which seems to have lost a lot in time and especially due to modern translation. Ancient Norse also has many of the underlying principles, too.

Yes, Latin has power.

As to not move the conversation into what these are, and further make up a situation where information is exposed to the enemy, I believe that reply will suffice.
 
HP. Hoodedcobra666 said:
existentialcrisis said:
Gabriel Lamb said:
Hp HoodedCobra shared this quote in latin from our estimed God Beelzebul.
Which brings me to the question, what about Latin? How close is it to an actual language based upon sacred numerical value and sound frequency?

You can see how in many words it is close to sanskrit like Ignis in latin being similar to Agni from sanskrit. Both meaning fire.
I've heard people talk about how modern languages like english are not very spiritual, but talk about ancient latin and greek as spiritual languages, and above all, sanskrit as the lingua franca of spirituality.

But I don't understand this. If sanskrit is the divine language, the language of the gods and the one with the greatest power, why did we have latin or greek at all, or any other language, for that matter?

Why wasn't sanskrit the universal language of humanity instead of every race and ethnic group developing their own language families?

How come sanskrit isn't used today in india instead of hindi and other modern indian languages?

Sanskrit was not the universal language or the "Central" language.

The situation with languages is that Ancient Greek and Sanskrit are Divine. The reasons however are in how they are.

The situation of this is not because Sanskrit is the source, but because of how these languages are. The importance is underlined into what these languages have inside them, and so long a language supports certain principles, it's a Holy Language.

I do believe Ancient Greek is actually as old as Sanskrit and I have personal proof in regards to that. Both languages will lead to Divine outcome. Latin is also included here, and it's derived from the underlying concepts of Ancient Greek and Sanskrit. These were certainly what we refer to as "Demonic Language" or "Language of the Gods".

Egyptian has also been based on the same concepts, but these have been lost and largely corrupted, and that's the only reason it's not in the same category.

As long as the principles are maintained, a language is then Holy. Holy language is not always meant for everyday use. Languages form according to people's, the situation is what of these languages does possess most of the powers the Gods have bestowed on these principles.

Ancient Greek is maxed out and is a "perfect language", same as Sanskrit, equally lofty in perfection of these principles. To understand one must study these, and I have studied both. Egyptian is in the same category, but I could never really study it due to lack of connections and true teaching of the language, which seems to have lost a lot in time and especially due to modern translation. Ancient Norse also has many of the underlying principles, too.

Yes, Latin has power.

As to not move the conversation into what these are, and further make up a situation where information is exposed to the enemy, I believe that reply will suffice.
I see, that was very interesting and helpful. Thank you, HP.

Can I ask about arabic? It's one of very few abjad based languages, one other being hebrew, and also like hebrew, is read right to left. Its origins seem unclear and seems to have cropped up alongside islam.

Many MENA people speak local dialects, which can differ greatly from both each other and standard arabic, which isn't commonly used anyway.

Is, or was that a spiritual language? And is it a natural language, or is it a corruption by the enemy? It being one of two major languages written right to left seems very strange, especially when that other language is jewish.
 
A language is exactly as an Operating System in computers, and each language can enable you to think and acquire in a specific way. The divine languages I see them as being closest to reality and the most encompassing of reality. Enables the mind and understanding of things in a different way. A non-spiritual language will do the opposite, disable and transform the mind upon a different purpose.

Having vastness of existence, these languages will be also tied to the soul type and energies, and will be in an interdependency. It is a mirror on both ends.
 
Cobra, what do you think of the Greek magic papyri ? Although some of them have Jewish names, there are many spells that use Greek charms, these can be used as mantras ?
 
Yang said:
Cobra, what do you think of the Greek magic papyri ? Although some of them have Jewish names, there are many spells that use Greek charms, these can be used as mantras ?

I think they are heavily corrupted. But they can give you important clues. They come from an era where a little confusion has started to kick in. But in them, there are a few things that if you make your research, will be good.

The instructions on how to use them are also gone. These instructions were given by word of mouth, mostly, back in these times.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top