Debunking Stupid and Retarded claims about Individualism in Satanism

[Jrvan]

" post_id=357966 time=1653447507 user_id=21286]


Just from a perspective of what is most likely, I don't think this is the case. I think it is more likely that, either due to mercury retrograde or his sensitivity to the subject, he misinterpreted VoE as talking about him. I imagine that they talk with another about their forum experiences, hence why you see them on the same thread.

That is more probable than an individual who has made a sum of nearly 2,000 posts acting as two different people.

No he's been accused of this from the start. The Tabby account was made for supporting the jrvan individual in an argument. You can look at this from their posts.

Mercury Retrograde cannot explain why an individual thinks that you're talking him when you're talking to his alleged wife. Ofcourse in no circumstance can such a confusion occur.

My mind has been convinced of it. It looks like my earlier posts wasn't approved. Whatever, I was saying the same thing anyway.

Jrvan and Tabby are the same person.

• Voe was talking to Tabby ,Jrvans alleged wife.

• Jrvan wasn't mentioned or quoted once.

• Jrvan says however that VOE was talking to him.

Those three sentences can only make sense if you deduce that both the accounts are being operated by the same person.

What Mercury Retrograde has actually done is break the shell of Verbal Deceit that was being employed by this individual. This is called a Freudian Slip where you unconsciously blurt out things that you weren't supposed to do.

This has just exacerbated the situation so that the verbal mask can't hold up any longer and cracks are opened in it.

What Mercury retrograde has done is expose this individual for operating two accounts simultaneously and pretending to be two people. That is what has happened here.

No one can convince me otherwise. The evidence is their own admission so it can't be denied.

If you're going that route, then it makes more sense for Tabby to be the one pretending to be Jrvan. If you consider the issues she's opened up about before, then it completely makes sense why she would want to pretend to be a man online, especially a man with feministic tendencies like Jrvan; on the other hand, she also wants to be able to express herself genuinely, hence why two accounts would be needed. Considering the non-traditional ideals regarding "masculinity" expressed on both accounts, it doesn't seem all that far-fetched to think that Jrvan is Tabby's dream husband, literally in the sense that she dreamed him up and played a character.

However, just because something makes sense, doesn't mean it's true. In the end, the Truth is simply how it is regardless of whether people understand it or not. In this case you misunderstand it, and come across as delusional. If you find that embarrassing, perhaps you can blame it on Mercury Retrograde, or you could double down for the sake of your pride (and my amusement).

They may be polyamorous, but marriage is still meant to be a union of Souls regardless. There's nothing strange about them being so similar to each other, or getting angry on each other's behalf. Furthermore, VoE clarified that his post was directed towards both Tabby and Jrvan, implying that Jrvan succeeded in reading between the lines to notice that, whereas you failed.

Please excuse me for stepping in so suddenly. I was so amused that I couldn't help myself.

Okay, I'm a little feminine, but bro I hit the checkboxes for at least like 2 of the fragile masculinity criteria so I'm obviously a man. Sheesh.

 

[Elite]

"We want to see one Reich one day, and you must train for it. We want our people to be obedient, and you must practice obedience."

-Führer to his youth

Enough words I think. Commander of this war has appointed by Gods, just as Führer had destined to rule over Germany by them. Thanks for article. Sieg Heil!

 

[Jack]

" post_id=357966 time=1653447507 user_id=21286]


Just from a perspective of what is most likely, I don't think this is the case. I think it is more likely that, either due to mercury retrograde or his sensitivity to the subject, he misinterpreted VoE as talking about him. I imagine that they talk with another about their forum experiences, hence why you see them on the same thread.

That is more probable than an individual who has made a sum of nearly 2,000 posts acting as two different people.

(To avoid confusion, this is meant as a general reply regarding all the discussions on the topic)


I had only intended to keep the peace here, as I read Jrvan and Tabby's reply to Jack as a provocative message in order to seek a reaction from him, which is a repeating back and forth pattern that has caused arguments between them in the past, which is why I referred to their messages as "sly", since it felt like a sneaky attempt to get a reaction out of Jack to be used against him in an argument to be formed as in the past.

I had interjected with intent to prevent this, to keep the peace, since reactionary arguing of that nature has never been beneficial for the communication between people on the forum, especially so during a Mercury Retrograde, however perhaps my way of doing it has been improper.

Contents of my message aside, my reply to Tabby was directed at both Jrvan and Tabby, so really there is nothing unusual or inconsistent about Jrvan addressing my reply to Tabby like he did.


That theory of Jack really does sound completely ridiculous.

There is no inconsistency with Jrvan mentioning my reply as directed to him.


Jack should follow his own advice and avoid replying to Tabby and Jrvan if he cannot remain rational or tactful when replying to the both of them.

Some maturity and rationality would be helpful here. Personally I see no evidence to support those claims, and even considering it to be true, there are better ways to go about trying to proof it or bring it up than what Jack did.


No one should let their personal qualms with another person cause them to create strange theories and conclusions about them that cannot be substantiated and would only lead to further drama and derailment of any meaningful discussion.


Hail Satan!

I've had time to meditate on my original comments towards Jack, while there isn't actually anything wrong with the question itself (though maybe the wording of it could be better), I understand and acknowledge that because that kind of question was coming from me (and my personal history with Jack is a sour one), it would be taken as provocative, perhaps even antagonistic. I will tread with better care and awareness of this for the future.

While I will never forget a wrong, I'm also not one to hold a grudge if I see someone improving and growing, and showing that they are more than what they once were. The question wasn't intended to be negative or ill towards Jack. It was to prompt an indirect solution to the topic and issue presented by him - though my approach was not the best.

Those who come here fresh, naive, and confused, will look to existing members to determine what is ok and not ok in behavior and conduct when engaging with others on these forums. That by leading by example, this can reduce how common people will come here and disrespect the community and authority. The only ones that would by that point would be obvious trolls, and people who need some extra help.

This account of yours is now blocked as well. Don't bother quoting me or commenting on any of my threads because I only browse the forums when i login. I wish i couldn't see the replies to other people. Its unsettling to say the least.

 

[Jrvan]

(To avoid confusion, this is meant as a general reply regarding all the discussions on the topic)


I had only intended to keep the peace here, as I read Jrvan and Tabby's reply to Jack as a provocative message in order to seek a reaction from him, which is a repeating back and forth pattern that has caused arguments between them in the past, which is why I referred to their messages as "sly", since it felt like a sneaky attempt to get a reaction out of Jack to be used against him in an argument to be formed as in the past.

I had interjected with intent to prevent this, to keep the peace, since reactionary arguing of that nature has never been beneficial for the communication between people on the forum, especially so during a Mercury Retrograde, however perhaps my way of doing it has been improper.

Contents of my message aside, my reply to Tabby was directed at both Jrvan and Tabby, so really there is nothing unusual or inconsistent about Jrvan addressing my reply to Tabby like he did.


That theory of Jack really does sound completely ridiculous.

There is no inconsistency with Jrvan mentioning my reply as directed to him.


Jack should follow his own advice and avoid replying to Tabby and Jrvan if he cannot remain rational or tactful when replying to the both of them.

Some maturity and rationality would be helpful here. Personally I see no evidence to support those claims, and even considering it to be true, there are better ways to go about trying to proof it or bring it up than what Jack did.


No one should let their personal qualms with another person cause them to create strange theories and conclusions about them that cannot be substantiated and would only lead to further drama and derailment of any meaningful discussion.


Hail Satan!

I've had time to meditate on my original comments towards Jack, while there isn't actually anything wrong with the question itself (though maybe the wording of it could be better), I understand and acknowledge that because that kind of question was coming from me (and my personal history with Jack is a sour one), it would be taken as provocative, perhaps even antagonistic. I will tread with better care and awareness of this for the future.

While I will never forget a wrong, I'm also not one to hold a grudge if I see someone improving and growing, and showing that they are more than what they once were. The question wasn't intended to be negative or ill towards Jack. It was to prompt an indirect solution to the topic and issue presented by him - though my approach was not the best.

Those who come here fresh, naive, and confused, will look to existing members to determine what is ok and not ok in behavior and conduct when engaging with others on these forums. That by leading by example, this can reduce how common people will come here and disrespect the community and authority. The only ones that would by that point would be obvious trolls, and people who need some extra help.

This account of yours is now blocked as well. Don't bother quoting me or commenting on any of my threads because I only browse the forums when i login. I wish i couldn't see the replies to other people. Its unsettling to say the least.

She didn't even reply to you in the message you quoted here.

Also you claimed that you blocked both of us twice before in the past. I'm not convinced, but if I never see you commenting on my own threads again then I will be very happy indeed. Your lack of presence will be a great blessing. I'm sure that my alter ego, Tabby, feels the same :lol: