'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

For those who wish to establish a relationship with Satan.

Topics of discussion include: Demons, Magick, Satanic Witchcraft and much more!

http://www.joyofsatan.org/

Moderators: HP Mageson666, High Priest Jake Carlson

FancyMancy
Posts: 1641

'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby FancyMancy » Fri May 18, 2018 2:30 am

Image
A photo of a woman brandishing a weapon in her graduation picture is the latest example of gun enthusiasts using female empowerment to further their agenda

Firearms, it would seem, have become a feminist issue. Both second amendment proponents and the gun industry are using female empowerment, and even the #MeToo movement, to sell their products and fight back against gun control. Meanwhile, the last few months have seen a spate of viral social posts by women brandishing guns, apparently in the name of feminism.

On Tuesday, a 22-year-old Kent State University graduate, Kaitlin Marie, garnered headlines after posting graduation photos in which she was holding a semiautomatic rifle. Marie wrote: “As a woman, I refuse to be a victim & the second amendment ensures that I don’t have to be.”

Last month, Brenna Spencer went viral after tweeting a graduation photo of herself in a “Women for Trump” shirt with a firearm tucked into her jeans. Spencer’s tweet prompted a number of other women to share their arms-bearing photos, often with captions about guns being empowering for women. Some conservative men also weighed in approvingly. “This is what REAL feminism looks like. Strong, smart, confident, and armed,” Charlie Kirk, a rightwing media personality, tweeted in response to Spencer’s post.

Kaitlin Marie(@KaitMarieox)

I have no apologies for my graduation photos. As a woman, I refuse to be a victim & the second amendment ensures that I don't have to be.pic.twitter.com/5CKmQobrMb

May 15, 2018


Image
Brenna Spencer(@BrennaSpencer)

I don’t take normal college graduation photos... pic.twitter.com/eI1NvLFYHs

April 7, 2018


Then you have the conservative pundit Tomi Lahren, who recently posted an Instagram photo of herself wearing yoga pants with a gun tucked in the front. “Ladies, chances are your assailant is gonna be bigger, stronger and faster and that’s why you have @alexoathletica for your gun,” wrote Lahren. The post was a promotion for Alexo Athletica, which sells gun-friendly women’s sportswear. Alexo’s website explains: “While big name athletic companies shy away from promoting one’s second amendment right and certainly have never built in the ability to do so, Alexo will never back down from supporting a woman’s right to choose how she defends herself.”

Image

Much of this messaging seems to echo the NRA line that guns empower women. After the Pulse massacre in Orlando in 2016, the NRA spokeswoman Dana Loesch claimed that calls to ban the AR-15 constituted a “war on women”. Loesch argued that because the AR-15 is the most popular rifle with women, “you’re talking about disarming women”. In the aftermath of this year’s school shooting in Parkland, Florida, Loesch also defended guns by arguing that arming women would help them defend themselves against sexual assault.

Framing gun rights as a feminist issue feels disingenuous and exploitative when there is a huge amount of research that shows women are more likely to be killed by a gun than saved by one. As Jessica Valenti wrote for the Guardian: “The NRA wants us to believe that guns protect the most vulnerable among us, instead of realizing the truth – that they kill the most vulnerable.”

Nevertheless, it would be wrong to ignore the fact that an increasing number of women do find guns empowering; women are the fastest-growing gun ownership demographic. According to a study from Harvard and Northeastern universities, gun ownership among American men dropped from 42% in 1994 to 32% in 2015, while female ownership increased from 9% to 12%.

Image

Deb Ferns, who runs Babes with Bullets, an all-women traveling firearms academy, attributes the rise in women buying guns in part to the growing number of single professional women who want a gun for self-protection. “When we first started the academy in 2004, most participants were women who wanted to do sports shooting,” she recounts, “normally because their husbands were interested in it.” Around 2011, she says, there was a definite shift. Younger women started coming to the academy because they lived alone and wanted a gun to protect themselves.

According to a 2017 Pew Research Center survey, women are more likely than men to say that the only reason they own a gun is for protection. While 27% of women say protection is the sole reason they own a gun, only 8% of men say the same.

Many female gun owners who own a gun for protection also have deeply personal experiences that led them to the purchase. Dion, a 35-year-old professional in California, for example, told the Guardian she first bought a handgun when she was 27 after someone tried to mug her. “That’s when I decided I do need to empower myself,” she explained. “Owning a gun has made me feel more comfortable. I really do think it’s an equalizer.”

Shayna Lopez-Rivas, 23, who recently graduated from Florida State University, also bought a gun after being attacked. Lopez-Rivas grew up in an anti-gun household and always had a negative view of guns until she was raped on campus in 2014. “I had pepper spray, he had a knife,” she said. “I wasn’t fast enough or strong enough.” The first time she picked up a gun, Lopez-Rivas felt empowered. “As much as women are equal to men in every other way, the truth is that in a biological sense we’re not equal. They’re bigger, faster, stronger. We need to find something that is an equalizer. And for me that equalizer was a firearm.”

It’s important to listen to women like Lopez-Rivas, who have found guns to be empowering. It’s crucial we don’t dismiss their experience. Nevertheless, it’s also crucial that we don’t let gun rights activists cynically exploit women’s rights to sell more guns. While firearms may empower some women, they kill a whole lot more.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/201 ... -sell-guns
Your special, uncomfortable, sensitive topics -
ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1789

JoSM Links

Offend/upset - Emos/Emotional People/Water Signs/Cowards/Wimps/etc.
What's Harry Potter about?
Enemy respect?
jew legacy

hailourtruegod
Posts: 491

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby hailourtruegod » Tue May 22, 2018 9:54 am

Grrr how dare women find a way to empower themselves that is actually Progressive and not ((("progressive"))).


Seriously only the stupid people fall for this anti gun narrative. Look at what they say. "Women get killed by guns." Yes women that were not armed.... "guns don't protect the most vulnerable. They kill the most vulnerable." Why are they vulnerable again? Because they didn't or don't have guns to make them not like that. I get a little triggered when people say things like that and there's more than obvious answers to their claims. Lol. Before I didn't know where this stupidity was coming from but now I do so I calm myself instead of almost yelling at the person saying stupid shit. xP
"Concerning my own faith, I am fighting under the flag of Lucifer." -Otto Rahn

FancyMancy
Posts: 1641

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby FancyMancy » Wed May 23, 2018 10:14 am

I used to be for (((gun control))) until the Ohio nightclub shooting. If a-- actually, a picture paints a thousand words, so I'll just leave this lying casually around -

Image

Naturally, it doesn't have to be a pupil/student and a school.

Feminism wants eekwallytee but guns = penises but fEmInIsTs hate boys and men but wAmEnZ (feminist women) need to muh-feelz empowered but but but... takes a deep breath

Fucking freudian penis envy. That's what it boils down to, but this reason, that reason, and the other reason...because because because because of the wonderful things he does.
Your special, uncomfortable, sensitive topics -
ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1789

JoSM Links

Offend/upset - Emos/Emotional People/Water Signs/Cowards/Wimps/etc.
What's Harry Potter about?
Enemy respect?
jew legacy

FancyMancy
Posts: 1641

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby FancyMancy » Thu Sep 27, 2018 11:34 pm

Regarding muh real feminizums.

Video - Woman dumps bleach and water on male commuters' laps to punish them for manspreading

A woman in Russia has embarked on an anti-manspreading campaign by splashing a mix of water and bleach onto offenders’ crotches.

Accusing men of “gender aggression,” 20-year-old Anna Dovgalyuk claims her native Russia has been slow to counter the problem.

Men on public transportation sitting with their legs spread wide are guilty of “a disgusting act that is being fought around the world — but hushed up here,” she said.

Dovgalyuk, who studies law, took a bold stand against manspreading in the underground train system in St. Petersburg, Russia, by reportedly splashing a mix of 30 liters of water and six liters of bleach onto the laps of men she deemed to be sitting in an offensive manner.

Image
Anna Dovgalyuk has filmed herself splashing a combination of bleach and water on men’s laps to protest manspreading. (Photo: East2West/Australscope)

“This solution is 30 times more concentrated than the mixture used by housewives when doing the laundry,” she says in a video. “It eats colors in the fabric in a matter of minutes, leaving indelible stains.”

She added that people can easily spot manspreading culprits due to their “identification spots.”

“Everyone can immediately understand which body part controls the behavior of these men,” she said.

She says her “video is ‘dedicated’ to all ‘men’ for whom manspreading is the norm of conduct” and insists that she was acting “on behalf of everyone who has to endure the manifestations of you declaring your macho qualities on public transportation.”

Image
A Russian news outlet claims the men featured in her video are paid actors, but Dovgalyuk denies this. (Photo: East2West/Australscope)

Calling herself a “social activist,” Dovgalyuk has previously attracted worldwide attention by flashing her underwear to commuters to raise awareness for laws in Russia regarding upskirting, a term used to describe the act of secretly photographing up someone’s skirt without their permission.

Meanwhile, Russian news outlet Rosbalt has claimed that her video is a publicity stunt featuring paid actors — a claim Doygalyuk denies.

“My action is absolutely real,” she said.

She added that no commuters had sued her so far.

“I don’t think people are going to go to the police to file a report about jeans,” she said.

Image

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/woman-dumps-b ... 56892.html

Above, "gender expression" is a hyperlink to articles regarding sexism; the link goes to a "sexism" page (https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/tagged/sexism) rather than a "gender expression" one. The first article (at the moment) is "High school assistant principal says 'blame the girls' for dress-code violations: 'They pretty much ruin everything'". Nope, that's not very pro-islam-male at all.

All of these..."terms", I declare, should be categorised under 'Word-stupiding'. Up-skirting, man-spreading (instead of leg-spreading, deliberate anti-male sexism)... Maybe monthly moodiness of da waminz should be called blob-spotting. :roll: Go burn your red-soaked bra, love.

Do Russians also say "filing a report", as opposed to "reporting [someone] [to the police]"?

Is she crying about "gender aggression"/sexuality, while using that exactly, at the same time so that she can get away with it, like a hypocrite with "reasons and explanations"...or is it just fake?
Your special, uncomfortable, sensitive topics -
ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1789

JoSM Links

Offend/upset - Emos/Emotional People/Water Signs/Cowards/Wimps/etc.
What's Harry Potter about?
Enemy respect?
jew legacy

User avatar
Powstanie Pogańskie
Posts: 56

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby Powstanie Pogańskie » Fri Sep 28, 2018 7:21 pm

FancyMancy wrote:Is she crying about "gender aggression"/sexuality, while using that exactly, at the same time so that she can get away with it, like a hypocrite with "reasons and explanations"...or is it just fake?


I wouldn't be surprised regardless of whether it's fake or real, but the hypocrisy is there whether she's staged this to make a point or is legitimately assaulting people. She's outright creating "gender aggression", if such a thing even exists, where there previously wasn't any.

Nobody fucking thought about "manspreading" until these neurologically malformed creatures pointed it out as if it's some sort of problematic phenomenon and slapped it with its own identity. They then go and illustrate the depths of their insanity further by assigning it special, psychological meaning; it's not merely something that could be considered rude to nearby passengers whose personal space you're cutting into, it's actually the subconscious desire of men to subjugate women and show off their own masculinity manifesting itself. By spreading our legs a bit so our balls can breathe. The fact that we don't even consciously spread our legs - it's just something we naturally do without thinking, typically - isn't proof that this likely kike cunt has her head so far up her own ass she left half her brain in her colon; it's actually proof that our subconscious hatred of females is so strong that we hardly even see it in our daily actions and interactions.

This kind of logic sets itself up to be unfalsifiable. Clearly bullshit, but there's always some "but wait" aspect of their argument that they can fall back on, and even if we can be 95% certain what they're saying is incorrect, they'll cling to that little nugget of chance, that improbable explanation they've concocted for why things are what they are. Thus, no matter how clear and well-reasoned the arguments are for manspreading not being a subconscious desire for men to subjugate and oppress women, the fact we have no means of proving this 100% is all they need to keep parroting their narrative as if it's equally valid compared to actual scientific observation and data. Lamentably for them, science requires that claims and arguments be falsifiable, and the fact that they try to wiggle out of this criterion is enough to completely bar them from any genuinely scientific discussion on the topic.
Ognista Kasia i jej węże
poszły w gorę wieżę.
Wdychały światło, wydychały mądrości,
i wiedziały, że Weles jest z nimi.


Wojownicy Welesa, rozpostrzyjcie wasze skrzydła i śpiewajcie o waszych siłach! To jest nasz czas!

FancyMancy
Posts: 1641

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby FancyMancy » Mon Oct 01, 2018 2:25 pm

Powstanie Pogańskie wrote:"gender aggression"

I'd be more inclined towards this -
Image

Powstanie Pogańskie wrote:This kind of logic sets itself up to be unfalsifiable. Clearly bullshit, but there's always some "but wait" aspect of their argument that they can fall back on, and even if we can be 95% certain what they're saying is incorrect, they'll cling to that little nugget of chance, that improbable explanation they've concocted for why things are what they are. Thus, no matter how clear and well-reasoned the arguments are for manspreading not being a subconscious desire for men to subjugate and oppress women, the fact we have no means of proving this 100% is all they need to keep parroting their narrative as if it's equally valid compared to actual scientific observation and data. Lamentably for them, science requires that claims and arguments be falsifiable, and the fact that they try to wiggle out of this criterion is enough to completely bar them from any genuinely scientific discussion on the topic.

Precisely. I once came across an argument that the Bombardier Beetle is evolutionists' bane/nightmare, because without each and every single one of its Body systems and parts, it couldn't possibly have evolved as it did, with any single one omitted during evolution.

Evolution vs creation arguments go all over everywhere, and they are batted back and forth. A new thing is proof, automatically, without further, in-depth research - and this is absolute proof for jewsus. e.g., once when I was an xian idiot, someone discovered that "business workers are now working in groups of 12, because that is the best number to work in, in the boardroom/teams". One example is the Bombardier Beetle, and another is simply that about 12 workers all on its own is proof that the 12 disciples + 1 jew which = 13, not 12, is the perfect number, to do group things in twelves. That is absolute proof. Ignorant proof, ignorant "proof".

- If someone kills a man of "god" before his time, the weight of "heaven" will come down upon that person.
- Yay! That is amazunce! It proves beyond all proovez muh jeebus!

- [any in-depth discussion about Harry Potter]
- Such amazinguls! J K Rowling is soopa- doopah!

Consider 2 columns, the creation column with 10 001 arguments, the evolution column with 10 000 arguments. "god" prefers to waste much time; energy; effort; money; anger/frustrations/ad hominem attacks; etc., on finding that one single argument, instead of just beaming knowledge straight into everyone's brains, and this single thing after much waste, etc., is the proof!...for a while. :roll: "Prove 'god' doesn't exist." "You can't prove a negative." You can - give "god" a second to prove itself absolutely. Of course, though, "iT dOeSn'T wOrK lIkE tHaT". Insert nearly any argument here - "tHaT's DiFfErEnT". Everything is always different. Scientists/evolutionists have 10 000 arguments because we are re-learning things; creationists have 10 001 because the sentences in the holey scriptures are ambiguous, and things are cherry-picked, and means one thing and then another thing when it suits them.

I'm speaking regarding xianity here, but it's similar with other in-groups, and is the same kike poison. The same subjective, barely-brainable arguments, thinking, and circular reasoning/logic, are in some different secular in-groups. Further arguments to out-argue one in these in-groups (if you know the subject), they'll say that it's still wrong, or they still don't believe it, etc. They can't explain why, but still. Rather, what it is, is that it hasn't translated into/through their emotions/feelings yet, and they might (more likely than not) not understand it enough yet, and the fact that the Mind is, and has been programmed incessantly, to be stubborn.

If xians weren't such passive-aggressive pussies, they might march on like christian soldiers, as if to war. At least (hidden/non-mainstream) science - at least should be - open-minded and trying to find discoveries, rather than trying to use any means to prove a theory/hypothesis. It has other ideas than just MuH jEwSuS. - That's what it is; a jew-on-a-stick is a theory/hypothesis implanted (drummed into) their brains repeatedly, and they are guilted, plus not wanting to have wasted money to try, into proving this theory/hypothesis. "It'll be awwrite in the end." That is the same with muh feminizums; muh veganizums; muh love-is-love-izums; muh-bronyizums; etc.

They, in each in-group (or you might say sub-groups of the different kike-made in-groups, or those in the non-SS in-group), all have to prove themselves "to themselves" and to others (despite denying that), to make themselves feel comfortable in their lost lives - or "lives". Individuality or non-conformity is still not individual/non-conformist!

Any arguments, sound and truthful as they are, are met with deaf ears (or eyes if online, for example) and the arguee feels threatened/attacked and uncomfortable, despite the arguer being sincere and trying to be helpful. Perhaps the helper simply asks a question - I once asked a vegan if they breastfeed Children. Instead of answering me, the tuna-deficient vegan just got angry and asked why shouldn't they...

Maybe an imaginative example - imagine a person standing up. This is a natural position. Imagine a person bent over backwards, which it has been forced into very slowly over years. They think this is natural, due to brainwashing in many various ways. Now imagine you going to them, asking/telling them about how and why they are in such a position, and offering to help them right. They dislike this, and tell you where to go. This position, in what I might say is only slightly less-than literally, and this reaction, is how it is with many people - or sheeple. SSs, and those learning, understanding, and applying, are, or are learning and attempting to be, standing up straight. Others ar-- think they are comfortable being...quite literally...bent all out of shape.

This article might be genuine or fake, but there are some similar things like it, as what I said above, plus others...and some which might be unexplainable -

https://youtube.com/watch?v=zgXCR3uvulI



(We SSs, and those intelligent non-SSs, must seriously seem boring and unstimulating, unlike those people with their heads in the clouds. We're more down-to-Earth, and those non-SSs who realise things, and either do or do not come here, tend to be depressed, from what I've seen. They notice, realise, and understand more, and try to remain strong, but stupidity undermines them and belittles them, eroding them away.

All the stimulation, hype, airheadedness/over-sensitivity to criticism, either in the blind/idiots' Soul, or them behaving unlike themselves so they can "fit in" (i.e. blue pill/red pill), keeps their heads in the clouds. Those intelligent and depressed non-SSs I just mentioned, being Earthy and realistic, are depressed and "under" airheads - numerous members have said that things look different in life sooner or later after coming to Satan. They realise how grey the world is, but the ignorant and blind ones think the shades of grey are vibrant. Talking intelligently, or "geekily", and using simple or more complicated terms causes you/them/us to be ridiculed. Intelligence is boring. Untelligence is entertaining. Airheadedness with hype and the jew having to keep up appearances, keeping juggling so many things, to entertain us and keep us with little brains...is so much more important. :roll:

The difference between us seemingly-boring-and-unstimulating ones and the ignorant airheads is that they have a limited pot of crap which stirs and stirs, seeming like a goldfish - "Ooh. Nice castle... Ooh. Nice castle... Ooh. Nice castle..." - whereas we (SSs do, and those intelligent non-SSs could) have unlimitedness to do whatever we want, and have an entirely new dimension/realm of things and abilities - including entertainment and enjoyment and interest.

Then those who notice, realise, and understand things might get worse. e.g. if anyone lets it, things such as technology not working - and after "updating" or "upgrading", especially, can piss them off more (and more each time it is used)...or they can be a good Goy sheep and accept the shitness of an expensive piece of shit-made shit which they don't want nor need. As such, I saw the headline of an article which said a new phone costs about 3 or 4 hundred to make, but you are charged about 1100 to waste money on it, despite you not wanting nor needing it.

Speaking about stimulation and happiness and joy, etc. - antidepressants (jew "solution" to jew-created problem) contain SSRIs - selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor, i.e. blocking signals in your brain because you've been too over-stimulated, so basically, what it sounds like, is chemical lobotomy and zombifying you.

I'll repeat all that in one sentence - we all (but us SSs especially) must work hard to improve and advance Ourselves and our World; those Without i.e. non-SSs, enjoy too much stimulation and coolnesses and entertainment (distractions); one may argue that all work and no play makes Jack the SS a boring; uninteresting; unstimulating; dull Boy.)
Your special, uncomfortable, sensitive topics -
ancient-forums.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1789

JoSM Links

Offend/upset - Emos/Emotional People/Water Signs/Cowards/Wimps/etc.
What's Harry Potter about?
Enemy respect?
jew legacy

User avatar
shinninglight
Posts: 262

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby shinninglight » Mon Oct 01, 2018 4:48 pm

when ever I see all this feminism crap I can't help but feel this bold up in my guts like I wouldn't take that nonsense,they say don't hit women well let's see about that,I just feel like if any women should try any assault on me for feminism she's going to get it,plain and simple.anyway it depends on who they mess with,some men are just pussies by the way.
thank father satan for knowlegde

HP Mageson666
Posts: 2059

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby HP Mageson666 » Mon Oct 01, 2018 5:01 pm

This is all just Jewish Communism. The Jews in the Communist Manifesto want to destroy and abolish the family unit of Gentile society as the basic structure of it. Then the Jewish Communist State takes control totally. So Marxist feminism is away for Jews to achieve this. The Jews were telling women to leave their husbands and children as they were oppressing them in the name of Feminism. When the Jews took over Russia they leveled Gentile society down with this stuff as well by enforced policy. Oh Goy a women's place is not at home with her children its working in our factories as Cattle Goyim.

Marxism is the New Testament in secular persona. Rabbi Jesus the thought form of the Jews to control the Goyim states the family unit is to be destroyed. You have to hate your father and mother and entire family and leave them to make rabbi jeboo happy. Every Xian family is fucking insanely dysfunctional for a reason.
Image

Follow the Slothz search engine to:
www.joyofsatan.com
www.exposingchristianity.com

User avatar
shinninglight
Posts: 262

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby shinninglight » Mon Oct 01, 2018 7:20 pm

yeah I know it is the Jews but I can't help it how women will fall for this kind of degradation,they go psychopath on it like they are trying to achieve something,one can not see the bigger picture and know that they are just wounding themselves.Jews are one thing but when I see stupid people its another.people should grow up
thank father satan for knowlegde

User avatar
shinninglight
Posts: 262

Re: 'This is what REAL feminism looks like' - how women's rights are being used to sell guns

Postby shinninglight » Tue Oct 02, 2018 1:04 am

i once watched a woman attack a man because he coughed on the road,she was like you coughed,she tought it was an attack and confronted him,i just thought this isn't really funny,this girls are going psycho because they have brainwashed them.sad
thank father satan for knowlegde


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jihiji12, Ravenignis666 and 10 guests