SouthernWhiteGentile said:
ShadowTheRaven said:
Look at America now. Now look at Poland.
Who gives a fucking shit dude I’m talking about the past not current day. Wow Poland is a majority white nation left in Europe, they are still opposed to NS and racialism. But they are sooo based bro.
Funnily enough poles hate Hitler and Germany more than anyone. I don’t think this is even a fair comparison. It’s like the giant douche vs turd sandwich false dichotomy.
Speaking in my capacity as a Pole, this is true. Not so much on the racialism these days but it is often forgotten that Poland is still heavily shackled by xianity and a cultural hatred for NS. It makes sense when you consider the history, but regardless of whether it makes sense how they got there, it needs to be corrected or Poland's majority-White, increasingly anti-Jew tendencies won't save it.
What I don't understand is why you're just tearing down an entire subgroup of the White race. Surely you can understand that's going to piss off people who don't want their own people insulted, especially when those insults are not actually based in reality. You don't like it when people insult you and your group, so I know you understand this.
I'm just throwing it out there that I reject the notion that Slavs are by and large ugly. People say this like they have some sort of statistics showing that this is an objective truth, and when you point out they don't have this, they just show you pictures of particularly ugly Eastern Europeans - not necessarily Slavs, but Balts and Romanians and Hungarians, etc. - and say "but see look at this specific example." Obviously you can have some ugly ass, Jew-looking Slavs out there, we've all seen it. But the same can be said of literally all racial subgroups, and I don't see the argument of "yeah but slavs in particular" as being anything more than a backed-into-a-corner excuse. Physical weakness doesn't hold up as a claim either, especially if your argument is you personally don't find Slavic men attractive so it stands to reason they're genetically weak (I hope there's more to it than that.). Especially when you see those strongman competitions and how a lot of them are populated with Slavs and Balts - and a healthy dose of Nordics, too. Iceland has it going on.
It's also worthy of note that you are more likely to be attracted to your subgroup, so it would make sense that non-Slavs tend to find Slavs less attractive. I tend to find Slavic features more attractive, usually. My other two main groups are also Anglo-Celtic and Germanic, and lo and behold those are also the groups I tend to be attracted to more often than not. I don't disrespect the subgroups I'm not part of, however. The issue here is that you equate your not finding them attractive as well as historical developments with meaning that they are therefore the worst subgroup, and this idea just strikes me as...anti-White, to be honest with you. I find anyone that encourages division amongst Whites, talking about which subgroup is better than the other, to be espousing anti-White rhetoric. Because it does create division, intentional or otherwise. We can have objective conversations about genetics, about the makeup of these subgroups, but dismissing a massive subgroup of White people as being just "the worst" and that they'd be blessed to have your genes and their men are by and large weak, it's just shit-talking. It's the type of shit-talking that would piss you off if someone came in saying that shit about Anglo-Celtics or White people as a whole - and people do say that shit about Anglo-Celtics and White people as a whole, using the same reasoning. And the shit-talking becomes even less steeped in reality when one tries to make a genetic basis for these arguments, when Slavs amongst themselves are so genetically varied that there's not really claims about genes one could make that applies to all Slavs, other than basic shit like they're White. Even if what you were saying were true, you're not going to actually convince anyone of that by smugly shitting on their people and, by extension, them. It genuinely does create hostility between different White subgroups, as the White Nationalist sphere on Twitter can really exemplify.
I hope at least some of this reaches you in the spirit that it's intended. It just genuinely bothers me when people insultingly tear down an entire group of White people - any White group, really, but certainly my own as well, because you are indeed talking about me by extension, as I'm part of my people, too. Even if we wanna talk about some sort of truthfulness to the genetic inferiority of Slavs to other ethnic groups, you'll have better luck with those ideas if you respectfully reach across the aisle to your other Satanists.
So you base your view on them purely on superficial reasons, ie. looks. Who would have thought. 
