Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

National socialism and inheritance

Satanic_truth

New member
Joined
Apr 8, 2020
Messages
83
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from Hitler in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen NS defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?
 
Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.
 
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward
That's already wrong to begin with.

National Socialism is about being a cohesive group and national unit where every member works towards the beneift of their country, and the country exists for the prosperity and protection of its people. It's a concept of mutual support and unity. There is no garbage like "forced equality" in National Socialism. That would be communism.

The reason why National Socialism is so amazing, is because everyone helps their country and the country helps them back. There are no idiot politicians and jews at the top raking in the profits for the peoples' hard work. The country is nothing more than the social community formed by all the members inside of it, and is built for the sake of supporting all the members who actively seek to contribute to it. It's a neverending loop of everyone benefiting and advancing. How much you benefit from it depends solely on how much you are doing to benefit the country, so of course a big leader-person with tons of responsibilities like Hitler or Himmler would get far more than a normal worker. But even the normal worker would have a life more awesome than what 99% of people currently have in the jew-world.

As for an inheritance, nobody in a real NS regime would ever try to take that away.
 
Inheritance is a part of Nature and because National Socialism is based on Nature and its cycles it observes this inheritance. Like good genes, the NS government valued the natural progression of passing down of wealth, health and educational means among other things- to the newer generations. It only makes sense, why burn your house down that your father built FOR YOU because you 'can't inherit', that's like communism or something. It's contrary to common sense, which NS is built entirely of so much so that the jews just couldn't stand it.

The way the National Socialists saw it was, if times are shittier in the present- why waste time and lament over whoever's 'responsible' when that's a complicated thing involving most of the people in the country. Why not instead emphasise in your government that:

"Our social welfare system is so much more than just charity because we do not say to the rich people "Please, give something to the poor." Instead we say "German people, help yourself!" Everyone must help, whether you are rich or poor. Everyone must have the belief that there's always someone in a much worse situation than I am, and this person I want to help as a comrade. If one should say, "Yes, but do I have to sacrifice a lot?" That is the glory of giving! When you sacrifice for your community, then you can walk with your head held up high."


Sacrifice is meant here not in a slavish sense, but from the soul- working because one cares. "Help yourself!" As in community cohesion, breakdown of the artificial jew social barriers between the "rich" and the "poor", in the dark ages for example, the king would wander out to greet his people after dreaming in his bed, and walk out to nothing but gristle, disease and misery, so he caged himself in his castle instead, slowly being devoured by his precious dreams. You could see the "rich" of post-ww1 Germany (about to get destroyed by communists) + any other similar situation like the fall of Rome(rich got ransacked by Huns, other tribes) for instance, in the same light. The syphilitic kings of the dark ages, most of them probably had a slightly lower life quality than the lordly iPhone goys of nowadays, which is a joke if you think about it. The National Socialists wouldn't have this problem of alienation like then or today though, as most people in Germany for one, actually physically witnessed the leader when he was in power because he made the effort to be known in such a way. He encouraged this NS community in his people.

Hitler valued work very highly, there are videos and speeches of him working with German farmers to make an example to the communists who constantly were trying to break down the relationship between the upper class/state and the working classes, he worked full shifts with different groups of workers to prove a point about how everyone must help and throw in their labour. That's exactly how Germany became a world power again after spending decades with wheelbarrows full of inflated money, and all the other symptoms of jewish degeneracy- A group of people willed it all away while encouraging the entire nation to do the same. They didn't achieve it with their "G-d-given muh kingly powers, it required bringing lots of different people together who probably rubbed eachother the wrong way, and sorting the crucial issues out for good.

When everyone in a community knows eachother and works together, inheritance stops being a cause for jealousy or the joo invention of "class warfare" as a false solution. It becomes impossible, to the point where people can only see through the joo proposed get rich quick schemes and won't take them seriously ever again.
 
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from Hitler in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen NS defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of National Socialism at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what Hitler Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe Hitler tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe National Socialism viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.
 
Aquarius said:
Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.

As someone born into affluent conditions, I’ve always felt that it was pure degradation and bitterness to shit on inheritance. If we don’t provide a better life for our children, how will we ever advance as a society? I didn’t directly earn the advantages I had, but they’ve set me on a better life course than someone born into poverty. I don’t understand people that want to justify toiling all the time instead of making things better and better every generation. Miserable slavish toil and hard work and sacrifice are mutually exclusive. One keeps you on the wheel and one provides for the betterment of future generations.
 
Shael said:
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward
That's already wrong to begin with.

National Socialism is about being a cohesive group and national unit where every member works towards the beneift of their country, and the country exists for the prosperity and protection of its people. It's a concept of mutual support and unity. There is no garbage like "forced equality" in National Socialism. That would be communism.

The reason why National Socialism is so amazing, is because everyone helps their country and the country helps them back. There are no idiot politicians and jews at the top raking in the profits for the peoples' hard work. The country is nothing more than the social community formed by all the members inside of it, and is built for the sake of supporting all the members who actively seek to contribute to it. It's a neverending loop of everyone benefiting and advancing. How much you benefit from it depends solely on how much you are doing to benefit the country, so of course a big leader-person with tons of responsibilities like Hitler or Himmler would get far more than a normal worker. But even the normal worker would have a life more awesome than what 99% of people currently have in the jew-world.

As for an inheritance, nobody in a real NS regime would ever try to take that away.

Hi Shael thanks for the response. I hear what you're saying but am still a little confused. You say "how much you benefit depends solely on how much you contribute" but that is exactly my point. A person who gains enormously from inheritance has done nothing to contribute to their race or nation and yet still benefits and is at a natural advantage over others. Would there not be any taxation on inheritance, since it is a way people can benefit enormously just by right of birth?
 
slyscorpion said:
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from Hitler in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen NS defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of National Socialism at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what Hitler Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe Hitler tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe National Socialism viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Jew, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Jewish question is solved
 
Satanic_truth88 said:
Hi Shael thanks for the response. I hear what you're saying but am still a little confused. You say "how much you benefit depends solely on how much you contribute" but that is exactly my point. A person who gains enormously from inheritance has done nothing to contribute to their race or nation and yet still benefits and is at a natural advantage over others. Would there not be any taxation on inheritance, since it is a way people can benefit enormously just by right of birth?
No, because the inheritance comes from what the person's parents have contributed, and as such their child has a right to receive this. Having a natural advantage is completely fine and normal as, again, this is not communism. The country is the construct of all the individuals contributing to it, but every person also has their individuality - their own money and assets and everything, based on what they and their ancestors have worked to attain.
 
Libra said:
Aquarius said:
Inheritance is totally normal, it's the Father's work that goes to his family, nothing wrong with it.

As someone born into affluent conditions, I’ve always felt that it was pure degradation and bitterness to shit on inheritance. If we don’t provide a better life for our children, how will we ever advance as a society? I didn’t directly earn the advantages I had, but they’ve set me on a better life course than someone born into poverty. I don’t understand people that want to justify toiling all the time instead of making things better and better every generation. Miserable slavish toil and hard work and sacrifice are mutually exclusive. One keeps you on the wheel and one provides for the betterment of future generations.
Well said.
 
Satanic_truth88 said:
slyscorpion said:
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from Hitler in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen NS defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of National Socialism at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what Hitler Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe Hitler tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe National Socialism viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Jew, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Jewish question is solved

Ok sorry didn't mean to attack that much I know for a fact the point of life is not to work so much you have no time for anything else or to even enjoy it and die. I also know the point in the opposite way is not to be completly lazy and do nothing or barley anything. We need to find a balance in this just like everything else. I think Hitler knew this. Your fine and learning that's good.
 
Satanic_truth88 said:
slyscorpion said:
Satanic_truth88 said:
Since the ideology of national socialism is work + sacrifice = reward and position in the social hierarchy, where does it stand on inheritance? Surely inheriting an innate advantage over others from absolutely no work of your own would not be true to national socialist ideology? I remember a quote from Hitler in which he said something along the lines of "the money left in your bank account when you die is the amount of time wasted at work". But regardless of this I have seen NS defend inheritance rights.

Can someone break this down for me?

I dont remember that being a part of National Socialism at all. In fact I remember it being said work should be something that is done with Joy.

While yes it is and always was part of Nordic culture to work hard on things. Me included I hate wasting time. I remember something about them making wages more fair and giving people enough time away from work in the week to actually live life as well and reflect on things. This was written about in sermons before search it out.

What are you totally making stuff up.

This is what Hitler Actually said "“The amount of money that is in your bank at the time of your death is the extra work you did which wasn't necessary”

This implies something different than what your saying.

Sacrifice yes and work are a good thing. But I believe Hitler tried to elevate people to as high of a living standard as possible.

I also believe National Socialism viewing work as something that should eventually be like recreation doing something one enjoys.

It's the enemy that puts all this emphasis on always working and laboring and making sacrifices for next to no reward never having time to advance or even think. That seems to be the attitude you have.

I dont think they had any problem with any kind of inheritances.

This response was pretty much filled with ad hominems and personal attacks :lol: I meant no offence whatsoever and I am myself a national socialist, I'm just trying to grasp the ideology better. Sorry for getting the quote wrong, but my meaning is the same. He says any amount of money left over is not necessary and therefore seems to be quite anti-inheritence (at least in large amounts)

I suppose without the Jew, people would not seek to unfairly give privilege to their children by working themselves to death. Most of the issues will be resolved once the Jewish question is solved

You mentioned tax and that is what I was thinking. I remember an old man once saying how he's struggling to work out how to keep his wealth intact after his passing for his family.

He had a sense of dismay at how the State would tax his estate to pieces.

I feel it's the joos usurping people's wealth to create their egalitarian society. I believe what people earn needs to go to whoever it's left to.

But don't worry about people getting a head start by inherited money.

It's been said that inherited wealth tends to get lost because it wasn't worked for and they don't have the knowledge to keep it.

A man that thinks about business and makes himself will have a more solid base to keep his wealth than someone that inherited it but didn't learn how to keep it.

Also I believe work must pay. I'm just about to go into work now. And I'm jealous because of all these benefits people about.

It's not free those living off benefits. People like me are getting worked to death and not getting wealthy because tax just robs all the surplus earnings.

I'm going to do a working to help me ease my work load I think. I believe in justice. Not equality. I'm not lazy. It's the joos in power making all of these tax and inheritance laws that rob us.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top