Rational Satanist
New member
- Joined
- May 13, 2021
- Messages
- 504
In other words: the water is wet. We "white supremacists" knew this all along, but we were called names for stating the truth.
This is absolutely insane. Facejewk is a woke leftist company that censors anyone to the right of Bernie Sanders and anyone suggesting that their heart problems might be caused by the vaccine. It doesn't show the same zeal in regards to pedophilia and child pornography in their platform though. What motive would they have to "not detect hateful speech towards minority groups"? They simply used generic "hate speech" detection methods and showed that most of it is anti-white. The simple fact is that the Washington (Com)Post which claimed that has posted many anti-white articles itself, so it is self-refuting.
Also, if you search "white people" on Twatter you'll get many verified accounts with names ending in -Berg and -Stein tweeting things like "Dear fellow white people: we are the most evil group of people ever existed and we must commit mass suicide for the good of humanity".
In a recent report, the Washington Post found that roughly “90 percent of ‘hate speech’ subject to content takedowns were statements of contempt, inferiority and disgust directed at White people and men.” This data destroys the narrative of the mainstream media, which has relentlessly suggested there is no such thing as anti-white hate speech.
While detractors of Facebook’s internal ‘Hate Speech’ audit have claimed the algorithm simply did not ‘detect’ hateful or violent speech directed towards minority groups, while also suggesting possible ‘flaws’ within the algorithm itself, others have viewed the report as generally satisfactory, as ‘Hate Speech’ towards white people has become institutionalized, and can be widely found on television, social media, within music, etc.
This is absolutely insane. Facejewk is a woke leftist company that censors anyone to the right of Bernie Sanders and anyone suggesting that their heart problems might be caused by the vaccine. It doesn't show the same zeal in regards to pedophilia and child pornography in their platform though. What motive would they have to "not detect hateful speech towards minority groups"? They simply used generic "hate speech" detection methods and showed that most of it is anti-white. The simple fact is that the Washington (Com)Post which claimed that has posted many anti-white articles itself, so it is self-refuting.
Simply searching for the term “I hate white people” on Twitter reveals MILLIONS of examples of individuals, boldly displaying their real identities online, confessing their hatred for white people.
This sentiment, which is exacerbated by daily news stories from the mainstream media, flies in the face of social media companies whose censorship of ‘hate speech’ has eliminated hundreds of thousands of conservative voices online.
Also, if you search "white people" on Twatter you'll get many verified accounts with names ending in -Berg and -Stein tweeting things like "Dear fellow white people: we are the most evil group of people ever existed and we must commit mass suicide for the good of humanity".