Welcome to our New Forums!

Our forums have been upgraded and expanded!

Welcome to Our New Forums

  • Our forums have been upgraded! You can read about this HERE

REPORT: 97% Of Anti-Jewish Hate Crimes In New York Were Committed By Other Minorities

https://www.msn.com/en-us/travel/news/haredi-jewish-organization-lashes-back-at-new-york-times-over-reporting-on-schools/ar-AA15YQnf?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=86d50fe47b3b4496990486bfc7b5cdef
 
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I hope this begins to show some people how messy and useless statistics can be for things like this. You can't get a perfectly accurate picture of things using just numbers. Like I said, it's good for making judgement calls in one's personal life, but not for judging an entire race when the entire race isn't responsible like how the jews are in their case. Jews are a communistic hive mind race/species with the same in built behavior and programming, but Blacks are not. When it's jews then judge all of the jews collectively, but when it's real humans who aren't jews then judge the individual.

I'm only making this comment because I realized that using the figure of 6.5% would be blaming ALL Black men in the USA, and I don't agree with that because it's not true.
 
jrvan said:
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I'm happy we can agree on this.

This is exactly what I said above.
 
jrvan said:
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I hope this begins to show some people how messy and useless statistics can be for things like this. You can't get a perfectly accurate picture of things using just numbers. Like I said, it's good for making judgement calls in one's personal life, but not for judging an entire race when the entire race isn't responsible like how the jews are in their case. Jews are a communistic hive mind race/species with the same in built behavior and programming, but Blacks are not. When it's jews then judge all of the jews collectively, but when it's real humans who aren't jews then judge the individual.

I'm only making this comment because I realized that using the figure of 6.5% would be blaming ALL Black men in the USA, and I don't agree with that because it's not true.

It is true that statistics are complicated, but not useless. It is fairly easy to use them to make predictions as to how much crime a place will have, for example, as this deals with groups rather than individuals. I try to treat all Gentile groups with respect when possible, part of this is maintaining a respectful distance. I will never shop, work, maintain a residence, or recreate in a heavily Black area if I can avoid it without excessive difficulty.

I know this isn't exactly what you're saying, just wanted to provide my two cents. I agree that with individuals, nuance is important.
 
jrvan said:
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I hope this begins to show some people how messy and useless statistics can be for things like this. You can't get a perfectly accurate picture of things using just numbers. Like I said, it's good for making judgement calls in one's personal life, but not for judging an entire race when the entire race isn't responsible like how the jews are in their case. Jews are a communistic hive mind race/species with the same in built behavior and programming, but Blacks are not. When it's jews then judge all of the jews collectively, but when it's real humans who aren't jews then judge the individual.

I'm only making this comment because I realized that using the figure of 6.5% would be blaming ALL Black men in the USA, and I don't agree with that because it's not true.

Sorry, in the post I just sent I overlooked where you said statistics are good for making judgment calls, given that I am totally on board with this post.
 
Ol argedco luciftias said:
jrvan said:
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I'm happy we can agree on this.

This is exactly what I said above.

I don't care.
 
HailVictory88 said:
jrvan said:
Not replying to anyone, but I wanted to add to something that was mentioned. When you divide the 13% in half (assuming it's a 50/50% ratio between men and women of the race), you then have to further divide the 6.5% because it's obviously not 100% of the 6.5% doing the crime. So it would be even less of a percentage of the total 13% population. 1% of the population would be slightly over 3 million people. Multiply it a little bit and you have give or take 10 million Black people committing 50% of the murders in the USA. You also have to adjust for repeat criminals and other factors.

I hope this begins to show some people how messy and useless statistics can be for things like this. You can't get a perfectly accurate picture of things using just numbers. Like I said, it's good for making judgement calls in one's personal life, but not for judging an entire race when the entire race isn't responsible like how the jews are in their case. Jews are a communistic hive mind race/species with the same in built behavior and programming, but Blacks are not. When it's jews then judge all of the jews collectively, but when it's real humans who aren't jews then judge the individual.

I'm only making this comment because I realized that using the figure of 6.5% would be blaming ALL Black men in the USA, and I don't agree with that because it's not true.

Sorry, in the post I just sent I overlooked where you said statistics are good for making judgment calls, given that I am totally on board with this post.

No problem, the elaboration is good.

Probably a lot of Black people avoid places like that too. It's obvious why some of them prefer White neighborhoods. Racial reality can't be ignored if one wants to be safe, and anyone who tries to deny it completely as if it's not there is either a self deceiver or a crook. Looking forward to better days when all of the races are completely free from jewish influence.
 
Sorry to bump this again, but I thought of an example to further illustrate my point for understanding.

Let's say hypothetically there were a number of White people living in China. A large group of these Whites were being led/influenced by jews to engage in large scale fraud and various scams. Let's say the jews lied to them and said the Chinese had intentionally disadvantaged them, that they are supposed to be equals in Chinese society, blah blah the same mirrored lies and rhetoric, and that their form of revenge should be to scam the Chinese out of all their hard earned money and wealth. So they are taught by jews to be criminals in someone else's society, same old story.

Now, the Chinese start having conversations about it, and they spin the rhetorical line of "White people only make up 10% of the population, but they are responsible for 90% of the white collar crime." ~1.5 billion divided by 10 is 150 million. 150 million White people. But let's say less than 10 million of them were committing white collar crime. Otherwise the rest of them are law abiding citizens.

How would it feel? Wouldn't you think the ones saying that line were pretty ignorant?

I'm convinced the "13/50%" rhetoric is just a controlled opposition line to make White nationalists look bad, and look stupid too.
 

Al Jilwah: Chapter IV

"It is my desire that all my followers unite in a bond of unity, lest those who are without prevail against them." - Satan

Back
Top