Do the Jews use their "victim" status as a weapon/tool?

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Good Afternoon, everyone,

Recently, a few days ago, I've surfed the web and stumbled upon a dishonest, if odd blog story about of several New York Police officers allegedly suffering from, of all things, milk-shake poisoning. Yes, milkshakes being poisoned.

LINK: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/slacktivist/2020/06/23/shake-shack-who/

Despite the blog above supporting the Jewish programs, the story in question gave me some degree of insight on how people fall for the Jews fake sob-stories.

The blogger mentions how the idea of the New York Police (Who see people "rallying around and behind victims") claiming to the public that they were the victims and not the milkshake workers, hoping to steal some sort of "moral authority" from the latter by falsely claiming victimhood." This leads me to wonder if there's some sort of paradox logic surrounding victimhood. in fact, even back at the start of 2021 (I had no idea this place had a forum at the time), I suspected and theorized about this; when people rally behind a victim, not only is the victim protected from any further attacks, but this indirectly "empowers" them in the process. The end result: by claiming victimhood, they gain, power, AND "moral authority" in one move.

"Criticism of police killings and police violence always seems to be unsettling and bewildering for police departments. They don’t quite comprehend what they’re hearing and don’t know how to respond. They seem to dimly grasp that the criticism against them has some strange power — that they people they have harmed and wronged are wielding some kind of incomprehensible moral authority against them. But they’re not quite able to understand what that moral authority means or how it works.

So they try to imitate it, to mimic the form of this thing they recognize is somehow powerful but whose power they are not able to understand. They see the public rallying around and behind their victims so they imagine that claiming such victimhood for themselves will by some mysterious alchemy allow them to wield that same confusing moral authority. So they start telling stories asserting that they are the “real” victims.

These stories are not true, or even plausible. Nor are they even remotely proportional to the lethal, life-destroying true stories of the people they are being criticized for beating, killing, framing, and unjustly ruining the lives of. This is part of what they don’t grasp — that the truth and the actual substance of those stories matters. All they seem to perceive, rather, is that there’s something inscrutably magical about the status of victimhood and they’re desperate to claim that status for themselves."

Looking at these two paragraphs quoted above and given how Jewish New York is now... this "Shake Shack" story is exactly like the way the Jews bring up the Holocaust; the Jews falsely claim victimhood (when Hitler and his Germany actually sued their asses), ignorant bleeding hearts believe the Jews, allowing the Kike bastards can justify any awful, genocidal plan they enact.

 

[Draconi666]

Yes they use it, and very much.

They use it when they are loosing, then it is needed.

Mercy lowers defences.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Yes they use it, and very much.

They use it when they are loosing, then it is needed.

Mercy lowers defences.

Thank you.

I've always suspected that kindness and compassion had some flaws, despite people speaking so highly of their perks and the success stories told of it. That kindness and compassion can backfire in some form or another. Are people so focused on fulfilling the aesops surrounding kindness compassion?

Is this part of the reason (or least a factor) white people are less than 10% of the global population right now? Whether or not it's the case, It still disturbs me nonetheless how well this sort of tactic has worked for the enemy.

 

[Draconi666]

Yes they use it, and very much.

They use it when they are loosing, then it is needed.

Mercy lowers defences.

Thank you.

I've always suspected that kindness and compassion had some flaws, despite people speaking so highly of their perks and the success stories told of it. That kindness and compassion can backfire in some form or another. Are people so focused on fulfilling the aesops surrounding kindness compassion?

Is this part of the reason (or least a factor) white people are less than 10% of the global population right now? Whether or not it's the case, It still disturbs me nonetheless how well this sort of tactic has worked for the enemy.

I think it is not that Kindness and compassion has flaws, but that these has it’s place where it should be used and where it shouldn’t and also how much needed and not to be pushed to extremes.

Sensible and rational usage of these abilities brings joyful benefits if those who use it, are sane and knows it is not to be used for the benefit of the enemy, but for our growth and advancement.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

Yes they use it, and very much.

They use it when they are loosing, then it is needed.

Mercy lowers defences.

Thank you.

I've always suspected that kindness and compassion had some flaws, despite people speaking so highly of their perks and the success stories told of it. That kindness and compassion can backfire in some form or another. Are people so focused on fulfilling the aesops surrounding kindness compassion?

Is this part of the reason (or least a factor) white people are less than 10% of the global population right now? Whether or not it's the case, It still disturbs me nonetheless how well this sort of tactic has worked for the enemy.

I think it is not that Kindness and compassion has flaws, but that these has it’s place where it should be used and where it shouldn’t and also how much needed and not to be pushed to extremes.

Sensible and rational usage of these abilities brings joyful benefits if those who use it, are sane and knows it is not to be used for the benefit of the enemy, but for our growth and advancement.

I've receives a similar answer like yours

Besides idiot Christians and just plain ignorant imbeciles, who else do you think push kindness and compassion to extremes, leading people to drop their guards, thus leading to the economic turmoil we're in now?

What am I'm missing here?

 

[sublimestatanist]

Thank you.

I've always suspected that kindness and compassion had some flaws, despite people speaking so highly of their perks and the success stories told of it. That kindness and compassion can backfire in some form or another. Are people so focused on fulfilling the aesops surrounding kindness compassion?

Is this part of the reason (or least a factor) white people are less than 10% of the global population right now? Whether or not it's the case, It still disturbs me nonetheless how well this sort of tactic has worked for the enemy.

I think it is not that Kindness and compassion has flaws, but that these has it’s place where it should be used and where it shouldn’t and also how much needed and not to be pushed to extremes.

Sensible and rational usage of these abilities brings joyful benefits if those who use it, are sane and knows it is not to be used for the benefit of the enemy, but for our growth and advancement.

I've receives a similar answer like yours

Besides idiot Christians and just plain ignorant imbeciles, who else do you think push kindness and compassion to extremes, leading people to drop their guards, thus leading to the economic turmoil we're in now?

What am I'm missing here?

I love reading these posts because they can never be overstated! I think the rhetorical question you placed here is asking who did it all start from, and I think most of us know considering that top rabbis have even admitted that the 3 Abrahamic religions were a Jewish invention. Not to mention they originally formed in the same area (cradle of civilization) where these people first appeared in history. This idea of love being the single force to stop all conflicts originates from the Old Testament and it has been used throughout popular culture and entertainment since.

I think spreading positivity is good, but it should be done in a way that supports and reinforces worthwhile people towards doing better, or as a genuine expression of gratitude and appreciation.

We should avoid placating others' feelings and ego because these are their own manifestations and their own problems to fix. It's actually a disservice to do so and as such it's better to give condolences and words of advice in these scenarios. Words of encouragement often give people a bandaid; it's up to them to face their negative side and to work on it.

From my very limited understanding, the Jews basically took over what is called Israel through infiltration and wars and that this holy land was never theirs to begin with. Correct me if I'm mistaken, but there's a point where it seems that no matter how much you research something you'll find that the enemy is behind it. It's very sobering in a way.

In a logical sense, sure, humans right down to their DNA I believe are meant to live in synergy, just like the rest of nature. However, certain 'cohnen' (reptilitan) genes I now realize are not human and have been on a mission to disrupt this as much as possible, be it conscious or unconscious, hence the over-fragmentation of groups and society. If you watch enough videos of these Jews you begin to see it. I see beady eyes with reptile-like features and muppet-like features. It's so subtle yet its burnt in my mind that these are not people. Just watch their microexpressions closely and observe their statements. I'm almost 100% sure Gates is one of them. Even the kids are messed right up and make me feel nauseous.

There are still some that are anti-zionist, sure. Around 3/4 of Israel's population is religiously Jewish, and 26% are foreign. There are always some exceptions to all groups, in this case the anti-zionist secular Jews; mind you, these are very fringe and are vehemently ousted by the larger community and the JNWO.

The reality of things on a grounds (immediate interaction) level are very telling and I do believe that we can find patterns between the microcasm and macrocasm of things. It sure is revealing how they always exploit the 'goyim' for their own benefit. The Rabbis even teach this; charge interest to Goyim but never to a Jew. It's interesting in a historical and sociological perspective and I thank you for sharing the information. Israel's supremacy, anti-mescegenation laws, and control over the world's finances and entertainment are undeniable to any person with a shred of intelligence, albeit the enemy has been beating down and degrading the human species for thousands of years. I also thought that this 75+ year assault on Palestine was common knowledge and I'm having difficulty with understanding how people believe a single thing the media tells them. It's unbelievable to me, as though yesterdays news disappears from the minds of the public only to be completely replaced by new news. There is zero common sense in these people.

At least here we have the absolute best resources for learning and growing, not to mention our work with RTRs. I can't wait to see what our future holds collectively and I look forward to us all coming together as Satanic brothers and sisters.

 

[DisillusionedCitizen]

The reality of things on a grounds (immediate interaction) level are very telling and I do believe that we can find patterns between the microcasm and macrocasm of things. It sure is revealing how they always exploit the 'goyim' for their own benefit. The Rabbis even teach this; charge interest to Goyim but never to a Jew. It's interesting in a historical and sociological perspective and I thank you for sharing the information. Israel's supremacy, anti-mescegenation laws, and control over the world's finances and entertainment are undeniable to any person with a shred of intelligence, albeit the enemy has been beating down and degrading the human species for thousands of years. I also thought that this 75+ year assault on Palestine was common knowledge and I'm having difficulty with understanding how people believe a single thing the media tells them. It's unbelievable to me, as though yesterdays news disappears from the minds of the public only to be completely replaced by new news. There is zero common sense in these people.

I've been wondering the same thing, and I've never fully gotten the answer: As for the media deception, One part is due to people wanting to be informed, but they don't know who's influencing the press backstage. The other part is that, as stoicism noted, the news is something most people can't control (though it can be influenced). Another part of the reason regardin the blind obedience I think is due in relation to the first reason: Most people only look at whatever's on the forestage, never considering if there's anything sinister backstage, where the upper brass Jews cannot be seen. They'll just believe what is presented to them.

I love reading these posts because they can never be overstated! I think the rhetorical question you placed here is asking who did it all start from, and I think most of us know considering that top rabbis have even admitted that the 3 Abrahamic religions were a Jewish invention. Not to mention they originally formed in the same area (cradle of civilization) where these people first appeared in history. This idea of love being the single force to stop all conflicts originates from the Old Testament and it has been used throughout popular culture and entertainment since.

I think spreading positivity is good, but it should be done in a way that supports and reinforces worthwhile people towards doing better, or as a genuine expression of gratitude and appreciation.

We should avoid placating others' feelings and ego because these are their own manifestations and their own problems to fix. It's actually a disservice to do so and as such it's better to give condolences and words of advice in these scenarios. Words of encouragement often give people a bandaid; it's up to them to face their negative side and to work on it.

Are Jews preaching love for the same reasons they preach mercy and compassion? To have their gentile enemies drop their guards?

Either way, I wish parents could teach what you posted to the current generation of children.

There are still some that are anti-zionist, sure. Around 3/4 of Israel's population is religiously Jewish, and 26% are foreign. There are always some exceptions to all groups, in this case the anti-zionist secular Jews; mind you, these are very fringe and are vehemently ousted by the larger community and the JNWO.

Anti-Zionist, Zionist. they're all Jews either way. Why would the Anti-Zionist Jews oppose their own kin, even though they're just as bad as their religious brethren?